Simms
June 6, 2014, 4:09pm
55
I’m a real-worldist. That means that I probably seem as inconsistent to you as the real world does. Or something like that. Everyone has a position. Best way to defend it is to force the other person to have to extrapolate it from a random set of behaviors and things one might say. Once you figure it out, then you can challenge it, then you can maybe defeat or alter it in some way. But the fact remains that no one’s given any argument here to show that what I’ve said about the poor is false. And I’ve presented evidence that it’s their fault. So as it stands, in this debate at least it’s the poor people’s fault that they’re poor.
Also…“my president in chief”? You’re reaching with that one. I’m not all that into politics. I voted for the guy because the healthcare act would bring in subsidies that substantially reduce my student loan burden over time. It’s just economics man. Same reason that’s good for me, is the same reason that it’s good for a homeless person to whore themselves, panhandle, stop spending money on hotels and all until they have enough capital to get into the game. Shit man, you could probably pass a bad check for a few grand and by the time they run you down plead it out and pay the money back and court costs, and if you were wise enough with the windfall then you’d still be able to turn a profit or at least stay ahead.
You can’t expect hard working people to just give you a life instead of saving for their children’s college so that you can waste time discovering yourself or thinking about philosophy or whatever you please. Those people gave up their time so that they could have more, and for you to want to take it instead of earning your own way is to steal thier time, their lives, and their work from them.
mmm…
I’m a real-worldist. That means that I probably seem as inconsistent to you as the real world does. Or something like that. Everyone has a position. Best way to defend it is to force the other person to have to extrapolate it from a random set of behaviors and things one might say. Once you figure it out, then you can challenge it, then you can maybe defeat or alter it in some way. But the fact remains that no one’s given any argument here to show that what I’ve said about the poor is false. And I’ve presented evidence that it’s their fault. So as it stands, in this debate at least it’s the poor people’s fault that they’re poor.
Also…“my president in chief”? You’re reaching with that one. I’m not all that into politics. I voted for the guy because the healthcare act would bring in subsidies that substantially reduce my student loan burden over time. It’s just economics man. Same reason that’s good for me, is the same reason that it’s good for a homeless person to whore themselves, panhandle, stop spending money on hotels and all until they have enough capital to get into the game. Shit man, you could probably pass a bad check for a few grand and by the time they run you down plead it out and pay the money back and court costs, and if you were wise enough with the windfall then you’d still be able to turn a profit or at least stay ahead.
You can’t expect hard working people to just give you a life instead of saving for their children’s college so that you can waste time discovering yourself or thinking about philosophy or whatever you please. Those people gave up their time so that they could have more, and for you to want to take it instead of earning your own way is to steal thier time, their lives, and their work from them.
Ah, I see. I know your personality type very well. The absolute opportunist that has no loyalties to anyone or anything. Probably sell your own grandmother if you were offered enough money to do it.
I very much disagree with you concerning the poor. We can debate it if you like in another thread.
The wealthy do none of their own stealing?
The wealthy stealing doesn’t prevent the poor from stealing too does it?
Create the debate thread. Make your points.
I like how you said, “my personality type” instead of attacking my points.
Dude you know I’m being the devil’s advocate here. And to be quite frank, you guys aren’t doing too well in the name of justice.
I like how you said, “my personality type” instead of attacking my points.
Dude you know I’m being the devil’s advocate here. And to be quite frank, you guys aren’t doing too well in the name of justice.
I don’t believe in the concept of justice. I do believe in freedom and independence however.
Me too. I believe that I should have the freedom and independence to gather as much money as I want, which is why I’m glad I live in America. I think it’s terrible though, that some people in this country want to take that freedom away from me, and reduce my independence by forcing me to pay out cash to people who refuse to earn it. I mean, if a homeless guy wants to wipe my ass and rub my feet then I wouldn’t mind giving him a little something, but most of them are too egotistical to recognize their place in society and do what they should to come up. They all just want something free from someone who earned it, which is the same thing as stealing.
I believe in the freedom and independence to rob or steal from the so called powerful.
I believe in the freedom and independence to burn their dwellings into the ground.
That whole knowing your place never sat well with me.
Nah man, sound like you know your place is on top. So start burning, or start whoring and you’ll get there soon enough.
The difference between you and me is that I have a sense of humility.
So which is it? Are you destined to burn your way to the top? Or are you humbly waiting your turn?
Oh, I will certainly burn my way to the top but I’ll never forget where I came from either.
I sympathize with the unfortunate. It’s the people that have everything of whom I despise that I have no problem with slaughtering.
I’m old school of a more Robinhood type perception.
Didn’t robin hood bleed out?
No. He lived the rest of his days as an outlaw fucking Maid Marian.
I think that’s the new version. It used to be that he bled out. I think they changed it to trick the masses.
Proof? I’m quite the fan of the literary Robinhood. The alleged historical one also.
At any rate, let’s create a thread of debate that you so desperately want to initiate. It could be fun.
I already said that I’m so in favor of deregulation that I can’t even submit to the rules of debate.
Who said there had to be any rules?
We’re both a bunch of vulgar and decadent social deviants. Like either one of us would follow rules to begin with anyways.
