Until now, I have never found any excuse to believe in the Big Bang theory other than the notion of extremely large black-holes colliding. But due to another thread getting my little mind on astrophysics, a thought occurred to me concerning what would appear to us as the Big Bang.
In RM:Affectance Ontology, every infinitesimal point in space has and entire sub-cardinality of values associated with it (wherein 1/infinityA = infinityB^2). And what that means is;
So, assuming the logic works out, there would be a “super-universe” above our entire universe. And within that super-universe would have to be “super-sub-atomic” particles forming. And those particles would form for the same reason that ours do, a maximum affectance density is inadvertently reached causing a delay in surrounding affects, “mass” forms.
But also in RM:AO, there is not such thing as an absolute infinity. So even though one point in space had challenged the maximum rate of changing potential (changing EMR) and thus formed a point of maximum affectance density (maximum mass density), within that tiny infinitesimal spec is an entire universe made of that same affectance merely on an infinitesimally smaller scale. That entire universe would experience a sudden infinite amount of energy “out of nowhere”, “from nothing within that entire universe”. Their universe would “magically” have an infinite amount of energy that appeared from nowhere into a single infinitesimal point.
A point within a sub-universe, if at the center of a particle, would have a very momentary appearance of an infinite amount of energy that would immediately disperse, filling the rest of that universe with lesser bundles of energy and mass, just as theorized by the Big Bang theory. Before that moment, the amount of energy within that entire sub-universe would merely be a much lesser amount determined by the prior amount of changing affectance of its super-universe, ours.
So what I am saying is that there actually does appear to be logically valid reason to believe that the proposed Big Bang really did pop out of relative nothingness into our universe, filling it perhaps just as preached (although the real laws of physics don’t ever change. That part has always been mere fantasy). And where ever there is a sub-atomic particle within our entire universe, a sub-Big Bang is occurring to a sub-universe.
…awesome thought.
… I never thought that I would be justifying a belief in the Big Bang.