Morality - the topic concerning how you ought to act.
moral fact - a fact about how you ought to act
Is this complicated or something?
If you’re “morally obliged” to do someting it means at least that it would be a serious moral error not to go to Batman. And no matter how much liking Batman gives a subjective moral reason to go see Batman—I’m not sure why you think it’s an obligation.
I won’t repeat myself again, after this. In english, there are differences of degree in some of our words that don’t mean essentially different things—this helps with clarity, meaning, etc. The difference between child and adult is a difference of degree, for example—degress of maturity, you could say. There’s no essential difference there, just one of degrees. And for communication, when we speak, we use the term best fitting what we mean. The difference between morality and prudence is also a difference of degree. And likewise, we use the word that best fits what we mean. That’s why calling Batman a moral whatever you said sounds odd. But you can’t keep saying, “I don’t know what morality is, but aha, that isn’t it!” …Especially when you’ve no reason to think it’s not, it’s how the term is used in the history of philosophy, and it fits with ordinary attitudes about oughtness.
Who do you continue to supposedly speak for? When people say, “You ought to do something”, and they mean something that matters, they absolutely do mean something moral. When they say, “You ought to do something”, and it’s a technical thing, like turning a screw one way rather than another, that’s just less in degree of significance, then they mean something prudent. This is a difference of degree, and the moment you admit of degrees of objectivity in ‘prudent’ matters, they’ll blend over to ‘moral’ ones.
This is the third time I have responded to this same point of yours. It’s probably best for you to come back to this post and read it over a few times.
There’s an entire preference-satisfaction brand of Utilitarianism… I mean, one central moral theory is just the theory that you should maximize the preference-satisfaction of as many people as possible. That’s a central moral theory. Whatever you think “common usage” is… stop inserting your bullshit view that a moral fact has to be on a postcard from god, or with a metaphysical sticker on it, stop inserting that into “common usage”, in order to say ridiculous things like, “nobody actually thinks you should minimize pain!”.