Luno is rather elliptical in conveying points of view. As near as I can decipher why revolves around the manner in which Victor Munoz invokes an alter ego to suggest there is no direct way in which to encompass these things.
If you’d like to experience the inventor himself he conducts discussions of philosophy at the Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club web site. [Sorry I don’t know how to do the linkage bit]. Go to “Discussions” at the top and click on “message board”.
Here he is “himself”—Victor Munoz. In fact, check out his, “a peculiar kind of moral relativism” thread. You can even join the club and participate. I did but I don’t. And I don’t because these folks are top notch philosophers and I am always in way over my head “up there”.
Anyway, I think the second sentence is meant to convey the fact that many men no doubt fantacize about raping particular women they come into contact with. The women are raped…but only in their heads.
Sex is so hard wired into the human brain – males, it seems, in particular – that countless lives have been upended [even completely wrecked] as a result of one’s inability to rein it in. We know the famous folks: Spitzer, Edwards, Foley, Clinton etc. But millions of next door neighbor types also find their own lives becoming hopelessly entangled in these powerful “urges”.
What is the gap then between what some only think about in their heads and what others actually do instead? I wouldn’t even begin to try to “encompass it directly”.
Besides, in here our own alter egos are always…“moderated”.