Saully, that made no sense.
Thought’s not thought, it’s thought!
Lol, just ask someone who’s actually had their brain operated on if they imagined what was being done. Unless, of course, they’re believing without knowing too. After all, they’ve only been there, and you can’t accept experience since it’s all imagined anyway, right?
Oh, so I’m not experiencing, interacting, and speaking to people who are there? I don’t exist? It’s dogma?
This is all thought. You exist be it you’re being imagined or not. You exist. You experience. You interact. You speak. You can’t tell me that you don’t exist, Saully. I won’t believe you because I experience you.
And look closer. Here we have an opportunity to examine discourse at a deeper level. The moral tone is decisive in her specific use of words. Notice how she didn’t call him “Saully” this time.
There is a very real pattern to this behavior, that is indeed a dynamic quality to human discourse. We suspect that by calling him his proper screen name, she is offering a subtle apology in case he has stopped cooresponding with her because she has consistently called him “Saully.”
However, the formal motive of her intentions are two-fold; she is, by spelling his name correctly, also apologizing for being rude in general, and this is done by the secret notice of the use of words, that is, until we just examined it did we notice its intentional structures. That she is apologizing for several things by apologizing for one apparantly, for it would be suspicious to assume that such an offering would have been provided had Saully not ended the correspondence.
Context! Two languages are being spoken here. What is not said creates a context.
I’m late in the game, but I figured I’d play anyway. Chugathu! I don’t know what it is, but since I said it it must exist? Can’t we say a word like “nothing” which stands in for the concept of “absolute nothing” without “absolute nothing” being a something? If we can’t, is my “chugathu” a “something”?
I think nothing is a concept that is BOTH the absence and the presence of. It is paradoxical.