Excuse me if i just use plain language.
I understand science to be a tool. A tool of language and a general consensus on agreed reality. Science is the classification of everything. I know that there is alot more to it than this but.
Essentially, practically it is US trying to order and classify everything that exists, is potential,and is past. It is our attempt to define everything.
This might not be satisfactory as a definition of science but it will have to do, for my point.
Science, Definition, Generalisation and statistics are all FLAWED!
I am not an advocate of any bullshit regressive religious brainwashing culture BUT, it is very important to realise science is not the “be all and end all” of everything.
I am sick to death of people assuming that just because i have spiritual beliefs that i doubt evolution and other scientific facts. It has actually made me very angry, because i cannot understand why people feel that they/I have to be either spiritual or scientific.
Here is an interesting analogy:
When the tsunami hit, tons of villages were destroyed, houses and buildings were swept away, pretty much the only ones left were mosques.
Now, there are two obviouse views here, as is often the case with most things.
-
It was an act of god.
-
It was because mosques are built to last.
Now, if i advocate the first point and agree that it was an act of god, why do these all-or-nothing, ultra-rationalist, sad-sacks assume (and heres my point) that i cant see the rational explanation, or they assume that i am ignoring the rational explanation, or they assume that you dont believe the rational explanation.
Is it not possible to fully believe both?
I believe, myself, that miracles work through a framework. This framework is partially and in a massivly flawed yet diverse and detailed way described by science.
Please try and understand what i am saying. thankyou