I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like this

A forum about the forums

Moderator: Carleas

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby AutSider » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:40 pm

I got banned for having three warnings? I don't get it. I'm asking why I got banned the 2 times around september 20th.
User avatar
AutSider
BANNED
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby Carleas » Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:05 pm

The first time you were banned for 24 hours after receiving your second warning, and the second time you were banned for 4 days for receiving your third warning (those occurred prior to the update).

Your first warning was for a series of posts (since removed) in this thread, beginning with the following:
AutSider wrote:Turks are sand-niggers and should be exterminated along with all other types of niggers


Your second warning was for a series of posts (since removed) in this thread, beginning with the following:
AutSider wrote:A better question is what they'll do with you, you filthy Jew. Mmmmm, I smell something cooking in the oven. What could it be? Or is it a who?


Your third warning was for this post, in this very thread.
User Control Panel > Board preference > Edit display options > Display signatures: No.
Carleas
Magister Ludi
 
Posts: 5440
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Washington DC, USA

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby AutSider » Sun Oct 08, 2017 5:44 pm

Oh, so you started censoring certain political opinions. Good to know.
User avatar
AutSider
BANNED
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby Mr Reasonable » Sun Oct 08, 2017 6:21 pm

AutSider wrote:Oh, so you started censoring certain political opinions. Good to know.



Trying to legitimize a statement about throwing Jews in ovens as a a "political opinion" is ridiculous. You are also an idiot.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 24708
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby AutSider » Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:37 pm

Mr Reasonable wrote:
AutSider wrote:Oh, so you started censoring certain political opinions. Good to know.



Trying to legitimize a statement about throwing Jews in ovens as a a "political opinion" is ridiculous. You are also an idiot.


But it is. War is but a manifestation of politics. Politics necessarily rely on violence, whether you're a liberal or a libertarian or a conservative or a fascist or a communist.

The idea that a certain group should get killed is indeed a political opinion.

And besides, the political principles which lead to the extinction of white people through low birthrates are being promoted and advocated for here.
User avatar
AutSider
BANNED
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby AutSider » Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:38 pm

Obviously, this isn't my forum and I can't make the rules, and I'm aware of that.

But what I will do is keep pointing out how the rules are bullshit and set up in a biased way. That is all.
User avatar
AutSider
BANNED
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby A Shieldmaiden » Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:07 am

HA!

images-9.jpeg
images-9.jpeg (7.25 KiB) Viewed 376 times
The man that walks his own road, walks alone

Old Norse Proverb
User avatar
A Shieldmaiden
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:13 am

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby Carleas » Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:32 am

AutSider has been banned permanently, per the Forum Philosophy, based on the pattern of conduct as detailed above as well as in several more recent posts.
User Control Panel > Board preference > Edit display options > Display signatures: No.
Carleas
Magister Ludi
 
Posts: 5440
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Washington DC, USA

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby AutSider » Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:11 pm

I'm not banned, retards. I'm untouchable. You can't permaban me :evilfun:
User avatar
AutSider
BANNED
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby Jakob » Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:22 pm

The gay porn in this guys sig... dude, get a bathroom.
Image
For behold, all acts of love and pleasure are my rituals
User avatar
Jakob
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5715
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:23 pm
Location: look at my suit

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby iambiguous » Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:24 pm

AutSider wrote:I'm not banned, retards. I'm untouchable. You can't permaban me :evilfun:


He comes in here huffing and puffing, spewing out one or another extremist rendition of "the human condition".

But, unlike others, that really doesn't interest me much at all. Hell, there have been dozens and dozens of others just like him here. Right? They all insist that they and they alone have all the answers. And, even though these answers are often hopelessly contradictory, to a man [and they are almost always men] they insist that unless you share their Gods, their religious convictions, their political ideologies, their philosophical assumptions, their moral narratives, their deontological contraptions and/or their dogmas, then this [necessarily as it were] makes you a "retard". For some "by definition".

No, instead, I come back time and again to this:

My own reaction to this sort of thing revolves less around whether his arguments are correct and more around how we might explain the reason that he opted for choosing them. Why these particular opinions and not others?

Clearly, there was a point in time when he first began to think about race [or gender or sexual preference] in what "intellectuals" construe to be a "political" or "philosophical" frame of mind. In other words, that point in time when all of the experiences he had had -- experiences that had predisposed him to one set of political prejudices rather than another -- were more or less set aside and he commenced to do some serious research on the subject. That way after "studying the matter" he could convince himself that, with respect to race, there was indeed an optimal frame of mind to be had here and that if you delved deep enough into these matters you could discover it.

[Or maybe even invent it. Your very own explanation for why most folks do what they do historically, culturally. Instead of what they ought to do naturally]

What he discovered is that, as with folks like Satyr, only when you acknowledged that 1] human interactions revolved first and foremost around biological imperatives and that 2] it was possible to grasp the necessary assumptions to understand them were you then able to both prescribe or proscribe human behaviors -- all of them apparently -- as either in sync with or not in sync with nature itself.

THE nature.

Which is why I would be curious to know how he did come to make that distinction between memes and genes here. What actual experiences did he have in his life that predisposed him to embrace his current rather dogmatic political agenda?

Finally, can he really say with any degree of certainty that new experiences, new relationships, new sources of information and knowledge etc., will not upend his current assessment and take him in a whole other direction?

Or, instead, is my own frame of mind -- that folks embrace one of another religious or secular dogma in order to embody the "psychology of objectivism" -- a more reasonable manner in which to grasp his political agenda here.

That's the direction he refuses to explore. Instead, he merely asserts that his own set of assumptions here are in sync with "natural behavior"; and that if you don't share his own frame of mind, you are wrong.


A "retard" in other words.
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=176529
Then here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=185296
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 22663
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: baltimore maryland

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby Carleas » Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:03 am

Sorry, user error. Now he's permabanned.
User Control Panel > Board preference > Edit display options > Display signatures: No.
Carleas
Magister Ludi
 
Posts: 5440
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Washington DC, USA

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby Meno_ » Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:27 am

Ramifications too complex for any simple analysis

This is not an excuse but a state, of degrees of anomal ie which connects strands of responsibility. It is not a.candy wrapped ideology, nor an absolutely effective sense of perception. This is probably why it is difficult to lay down rules of standards.

If this is understood in its bare logical consistency, then some of it could be ascribed to incapacity
It is a lack of capacity to bring it to a point where animosity, based on little understood motives, that hostility can break out.Looking for larger relevance within the embracing understanding will even de-demonize the worst case stereotype from morally apprehended mistakes, by invoking clarity of thought.

Such was the case with the decision above,
Meno_
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2610
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am

Re: I don't know, man. If you give this site to people like

Postby MagsJ » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:24 am

phyllo wrote:
MagsJ replies:
I thought unbiased moderation was a good thing? :confusion-shrug:

So what are you here for?
He's here to gather material to present at Know Thyself which shows how "bad" ILP is?

He's here to play the "badass"?

He doesn't really know why he is here?

Take your pick. :evilfun:

Well he's gone now, so i guess it doesn't matter anymore.
Image
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 16961
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Previous

Return to Meta



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users