Another clear case of moderator abuse (magsj)

She keeps modifying my posts, and lacks a valid excuse, tried calling a non-slur by me as a slur.

I’m posting this in case she tries to delete my reply. By claiming I made a slur when I made no slur definitely falls under the liable territory. I’ve made no slur:

I can point to plenty of spots where I’ve been called far worst, never tried to call out people on sliding me for my choices, such as being christian, or homeless, or straight, or a veteran. It is well within ethics to retort on voluntary choices. This is a philosophy site, not a Stalinist reeducation camp.

The homophobe took down my picture of two women kissing each other saying it was pornographic.

What does she have against girl on girl action?

Why do you hate lesbians Magsj?

I’m going to have to make a full thread about this, stuff is getting wildly out of hand on the parts of moderators, you only stop the rhetorical statements in ethics that are identifying something that isn’t choice, anything else is up to discussion and dissaproval by default.

You don’t bash a feminist for being a woman… that is involuntary, a accident of birth, but being a feminist is a choice. Same for someone attack me for being a christian… it has been a aspect of my ancestory for 1500+ years, but it isn’t my birth, my body, my genetics… I can’t change my position politically or within ethics in response to a attack on what I was upon being born, but all my actions are well within philosophical rebuttal.

That is our universal default. If the behavior can be changed, it isn’t a slur. Slurs can be included, Issy can yell about obnoxious black people for example (he hasn’t yet, just a example) being black isn’t changeable, but obnoxious is. It furthermore hits on identity… Issy, dismissing the two pair, is neither… It is as much a denouncement of the subject as a promotion of others unspecified.

It may not match your politics, but politics are in constant flux. Philosophy should never, ever be retarded to the current thinking of the mods and administrators. It would be the surest way to turn us lopsided and perverted in our thinking, and civilization would surely collapse as a response.

If you don’t like how someone is responding to you, respond. Sauwekios kept attacking christianity, I tore him a new asshole over a protracted period of time. How this shit works, how it always has and always will. Not up to Magsj to tweek everything to her clever yet random biases.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=191045

There, that’s the most comprehensive post I’ve made to date on Ethics and Rhetoric, aimed at moderators. I’m asking for the moderators to cease trolling the site and just focus on the spsmbots. When you try to do more, sets a very bad, perverted example, and the consequences build in time.

Damn, I thought this was going to be a thread on abusing moderators.

It’s “libel”.