On Lewd PM's

Recently, the lawyer Carleas, sent me a warning not to send weak-minded individuals lewd PM’s.

I sent a message to the ape, that I do not care.

I simply don’t.

In a desperate attempt to dominate me, he, in a fit, removed my ability to send PM’s.

So, if you need to communicate with me, I apologize for Carleas’ tantrum.

Let us discuss the irrelevance of the human social construct and their tribal ideologies. And how artistic, beautiful and Lewd PM’s are not inherently evil, nor is there any reason to remove them, except due to reasons of social psychosis.

I put this in the religious forum, because it is very much a symptom similar to the symptoms of religious psychosis.

Could you post an example of an artistic, beautiful and Lewd PM? If there are any censorship issues you may be able to justify it by calling it exhibit A.

Feel free to PM me a long written message once you have your PMs returned. You’ll find the experience once sent is very rewarding.

Unfortunately, I fear I can do neither suggestion A nor B.

For suggestion A
You see, the primates are on patrol, and they would not take very kindly to posting anything against their tribe’s customs.

For suggestion B
I am unable to do so, at this present moment.

A very interesting question is, why was the upstanding member Jerkey’s private messaging privileges removed?

…one more reason to be thankful that human existence is essentially meaningless and absurd.

Unless of course it’s not. Then, by all means, let’s resolve this. :-k

It’s not the lewdness per se; consensual lewdness via PM is none of my business. But you were sexually harassing someone by sending them pornographic PMs; it was non-consensual, unrequited, harassment.

You are back Trixie. I thought you had left for good. I hope you will be staying
this time. But try not to sexually harass anyone if you can as it is not very nice

Sexual harassment occurs in nature, and as usual the aggressors are usually chased off by the resident alpha males.

There is nothing new here, it is merely a play of primates. The only difference is, these particular set of primates are offended by beautiful masterpieces, yet, watching documentaries of naked baboons do not offend them. The tastes, are inverted of what they should be.

It is not meaningless perse, it is about machines acquiring energies to further more complexities or in MTV’s case, increase more chaoscentricities.

In my opinion, biological machines are superior to metal monstrosities. This could be theist’s supportive argument, that God would make the ultimate machine using DNA, rather than wires and motors.

Absurd belongs of the topic of consciousness.

Humans are a part of nature, so yeah, of course it does. And the reasoned arguments against it, and the prohibition and punishment that follow from them, also occur in nature.

Which I stated but mr. busy is too busy to read more than the first 5 words.

The “reasoned prohibition and punishments” hardly exist amongst the squirrels Carleas. The ones in DC bite your fingers when you feed them Reese’s Pieces, and run up trees when you try to smack them. They apparently have a lot of experience in this.

In the interests of freedom of information, which is a very important principle, the contents of the lewd PMs should be put into the public domain, along with UP 1001’s reason for sending them and the identity of the recipient. This has nothing to do with my own personal curiosity, by the way.

I am inclined to agree with Harbal, as for the reason I was simply astounded by the beauty of the art, and wished to share. If only those beautiful things with which we share have their hearts open.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjER2FXoRv8[/youtube]

Looks like I missed out on all the fun.

Being banned, or kicked in the cahones, is never a “fun” ordeal.

Stopping sexual harassment is censorship Carleas! You’re a nazi!

A tyrant yes, but not all tyrants are nazis.

I dare say not. …but I meant…

Ultimate Philosophy 1001

.

weak-mind·ed
ˌ
lacking determination, emotional strength, or intellectual capacity.

having or showing a lack of mental firmness; irresolute; vacillating

lacking in judgment or good sense : foolish b : feebleminded.

That’s weak-minded among other words and phrases…

Apparently, Trixie, your definition of weak-minded is accepting, with no holds barred, everything and anything which you deem to give…
Why would you think that anyone in here has to be happy or accepting of lewd or raunchy PMs which you send and they do not want?

dominate?
A bit of projection going on there, Trixie.

Let’s not forget that one man’s or woman’s meat is another’s poison.
There is art and then there is Art.

No, certainly not evil, but not aesthetically beautiful or preferred to some, nor asked for.
We reject what turns us off and we have a right to especially when a No has already been stated.

I would have put it in the Psychology forum.
Religious psychosis? Would that be the same as rejecting what is not aesthetically pleasing to us but rather so-far distant to that? Would that be the same as rejecting what there is no rhyme or reason for within one’s own mind - not by a long shot?

If someone in particular has no problem with being sent lewd PMs after they’ve been asked, then by all means, send them but not everyone feels like you - some don’t wish to receive them nor do they wish to send them.
Some things are a question of personal “taste” and “privacy” boundaries being usurped. It is not a good thing to cross some bridges.