Some time ago I had a series of very deeply resonating experiences, based on the revelation of certain items from new developments in astrophysics and astronomy. People from all ages past have been fascinated by the developing insight into the vastness of the universe, and that lead to increasing perks into the almost dreamy depths of the skies.
Even the thought of temporal relative senses of how insignificant our.planet earth is becoming, sends shudders down my spine.
The existence of a black hole in the center of a galaxy , very far away, has come to be assessed as a super massive black hole, its size equal to 20 billions of our suns. Further, this is only a measure of the latest discovery of that part of the universe containing that galaxy, which has evolved through the merging of multiple black holes, creating quasars.
In that particular super massive black hole, an infrared reproduction captured this monstrosity rating it , millions the size of our sun. This black hole in this particular galaxy, consists of 50% of the galaxy.
Now the sudden explosiveness of this fact . is so stunning that in my mind at least, it created quantum moment. The whole question of matter\energy can be thought in terms of limits, containing near absolutes, and the near absolute’s resistance to the realization of an absolute Absolute.
The only conclusion I was able to fathom is, that the conventional absolute reduces ever higher ratios of containment, of one absolute in another, as a measure of space-time.
The ultimate reduction through this regressiveness leaves, again hypothetically, a very minimum constructive conceptual realization , approaching a minimal particle which can be conceived.That it is what they call the God Partical nowadays, and it shows the amount of interest and expenditure Cern has cost humanity in search of IT.
My contention is, that its impossible on that level to find it, and its not because as is often supposed, that there really is no absolute minimum( because of the thousands of years of Greek paradoxical construction of supposing no end to halving toward,( any minimum quantity, )but that existential considerations configured reversely. IT,Could not have been sustained [bracketed], were it not for the conception of an absolute Absolute.(Being).
Getting back to the progressive fusing of multiple black holes, today’s technology has as much limit as the measure of feasibility would allow, further, say if we survive as a human species in the future here and now, its possible that more and more, ever larger black holes will become perceivable, maybe in an age of super optically linked intelligence.
Even then, the idea of an absolute Absolute, consisting of a single Entity, neither energy nor matter(the way its now described) must be a conceptual necessity.
Why? Because, otherwise the difference would not have any basis.
The real nothingness of Heidegger and Sartre and Cantor would be precluded. I wish we still had ST James here to elucidate, but Leibnitz’ two spheres comes to mind as he struggled with this. The only REASON he(Leibnitz) came up with this idea is, that difference being necessary to create not merely the idea, but the reality of that cosmological idea.
If there is no difference, in all the formal elements of that description, Being and Existence would be a mute process, where the process is included within the idea.
The idea is so unique in the cosmos, that its potential energy approaches an absolute, which eats up the diverse IT’SELF, similarly as a black hole does.
The Idea of a limitless black hole rating up all , matter energy, is inconceivable because here we are, here I/you exist, as a possible singularity, a testament to Being.
That is so profound, that if its conclusions, even if, proposed over the course if human history by intuitive philosophers, mystics, saints and gods themselves, must preserve the difference between the extremely small and large.
And that is what the essence of an idea preserves, and calls it Faith. Without faith, evolution would have been inconceivable, so much power does the downward power of negation appear to nihilize the acquisition of human intelligence, as surging toward the super intelligent being.(The downward pessimistic pressure of limits by empirical means, would overcome the mobilization((the Nothingness of Being)) ) But it can’t.
That power has to be an absolute, because it was still a divisible perepherouslunch involved-or participaterial entity, it would dissipate its power at the point where Descartes doubted his own sanity, with the concept of an Evil Genius.
This is how Descartes was misindetstood, and that is why God’s reason for creation still holds water.
Is God an Insane proposition to ward off personal insanity, as others have testified to?(Holderlin, Cantor, Nietzsche-& others )giving dangerous testimony or plainly killed for this reason-then this becomes such an apt analogy to the Cosmic Absolute, that the merging of the two becoming a neccesity so sublime , as to be able to be apprehended only by those Masters , who have perhaps reached a point in their evolution, that has become beyond comparison.