Moderator: MagsJ
turtle wrote:jesus was just a guy....the important thing about the jesus story was the message...is there any value to any of the so-called message?????
Typist wrote:turtle wrote:jesus was just a guy....the important thing about the jesus story was the message...is there any value to any of the so-called message?????
"The message" implies a single message. Jesus talked about a lot of stuff. Some of it may have value for us, and some not. Anything in particular interest you?
turtle wrote:i would like to discard the virgin birth and the rising from the dead things...
James S Saint wrote:The fundamental message was that the way to manage Mankind is through networked love and hope (thus the forgiveness issue).
Hope gathers
Fear scatters
The purpose of any religion is to maintain the gathering because single homosapians haven't a chance against nature and certainly not against other mischievous homosapians.
But a critical element in that message is "networking" without which no ethics will save anyone.
"Where ever two or more gather in my name, I am there."
turtle wrote:Typist wrote:turtle wrote:jesus was just a guy....the important thing about the jesus story was the message...is there any value to any of the so-called message?????
"The message" implies a single message. Jesus talked about a lot of stuff. Some of it may have value for us, and some not. Anything in particular interest you?
thanks typist----my point here is to make the story more human and not supernatural.
i would like to discard the virgin birth and the rising from the dead things...
Arcturus Descending wrote:How about the phrase interdependent relationships?
James S Saint wrote:The fundamental message was that the way to manage Mankind is through networked love and hope (thus the forgiveness issue).
Typist wrote:James S Saint wrote:The fundamental message was that the way to manage Mankind is through networked love and hope (thus the forgiveness issue).
I would argue that this doesn't explain the personal nature of the relationship with Jesus that characterizes the religion.
Imho, the bottom line is that the individual doesn't really care about the best way to manage mankind.
Typist wrote:"What's in it for me?" is always the bottom line question.
James S Saint wrote:..and you make it sound so intellectual.Good thing we aren't their proselytizers, huh.
"After reviewing a logical analysis of competing systems for most beneficially managing the interaction of individuals within the social infrastructure, and taking in to account the requirements of social cooperation in regards to the adaptive processes of mutual survival in competition with both nature and other social systems, the Corporate Executive Officer and myself have concluded that high levels of symbiotic cooperation amongst the parties to the contract would lead most efficiently to the stated goals of said project. Amen."
James S Saint wrote:"If you want your kingdom to be eternal, do it this way..."
If you guys want your words to be as eternal as mine, you'd better dump the silly fancy talk.
Typist wrote:turtle wrote:i would like to discard the virgin birth and the rising from the dead things...
Ok, gotcha. Once that's done, anything left that interests you?
The ancient world was full of magicians who performed miracles. Virgin births and births resulting from intercourse between women and gods was common.Good question Typist. How many denominations are there each with their own take on Jesus' message, to say nothing of the readings of theologians, historians, academics, and the rest of us? According to some, if you discard the miraculous, there is nothing special about the "guy." While I am not among those, I do think that the miraculous claims have helped keep Jesus in the limelight through the centuries.
phyllo wrote:The ancient world was full of magicians who performed miracles. Virgin births and births resulting from intercourse between women and gods was common. We don't worship most of these people and don't have religions based on them. Probably, there was something special about Jesus and the combination of his life and his message.
phyllo wrote:The ancient world was full of magicians who performed miracles. Virgin births and births resulting from intercourse between women and gods was common.Good question Typist. How many denominations are there each with their own take on Jesus' message, to say nothing of the readings of theologians, historians, academics, and the rest of us? According to some, if you discard the miraculous, there is nothing special about the "guy." While I am not among those, I do think that the miraculous claims have helped keep Jesus in the limelight through the centuries.
We don't worship most of these people and don't have religions based on them. Probably, there was something special about Jesus and the combination of his life and his message.
Typist wrote:James S Saint wrote:..and you make it sound so intellectual.Good thing we aren't their proselytizers, huh.
And so Jesus cameth down from upon the mountain, and said unto the multitude..."After reviewing a logical analysis of competing systems for most beneficially managing the interaction of individuals within the social infrastructure, and taking in to account the requirements of social cooperation in regards to the adaptive processes of mutual survival in competition with both nature and other social systems, the Corporate Executive Officer and myself have concluded that high levels of symbiotic cooperation amongst the parties to the contract would lead most efficiently to the stated goals of said project. Amen."
turtle wrote:jesus was just a guy....the important thing about the jesus story was the message...is there any value to any of the so-called message?????
felix dakat wrote:phyllo wrote:The ancient world was full of magicians who performed miracles. Virgin births and births resulting from intercourse between women and gods was common.Good question Typist. How many denominations are there each with their own take on Jesus' message, to say nothing of the readings of theologians, historians, academics, and the rest of us? According to some, if you discard the miraculous, there is nothing special about the "guy." While I am not among those, I do think that the miraculous claims have helped keep Jesus in the limelight through the centuries.
We don't worship most of these people and don't have religions based on them. Probably, there was something special about Jesus and the combination of his life and his message.
OK right. Did any of them resurrect from the dead? Perhaps it is the quality and salvific function of Jesus' miracles that sets him apart.
James S Saint wrote:"Where ever two or more gather in my name, I am there."
V-OutOfTheWilderness wrote:James S Saint wrote:"Where ever two or more gather in my name, I am there."
Does it count if we gather on the internet, or do we have to share a common geography?
James S Saint wrote:V-OutOfTheWilderness wrote:James S Saint wrote:"Where ever two or more gather in my name, I am there."
Does it count if we gather on the internet, or do we have to share a common geography?
I think the point is that they are gathered in spirit (having the same spirit, "in my name") and that they are affecting each other. The degree of mutual affect would determined the degree that he was there.
phyllo wrote:The ancient world was full of magicians who performed miracles. Virgin births and births resulting from intercourse between women and gods was common.Good question Typist. How many denominations are there each with their own take on Jesus' message, to say nothing of the readings of theologians, historians, academics, and the rest of us? According to some, if you discard the miraculous, there is nothing special about the "guy." While I am not among those, I do think that the miraculous claims have helped keep Jesus in the limelight through the centuries.
We don't worship most of these people and don't have religions based on them. Probably, there was something special about Jesus and the combination of his life and his message.
Users browsing this forum: iambiguous