Is God possible or impossible? And why?
I am specifically interested in possibility not probability nor certainty. The probability of God is an entirely different question. The certainty of God is yet another question.
I know very little about this, but it seems to me that one could answer one of two ways.
- Impossible because… (I would be very interested to read the support for this viewpoint about the certainty of no God)
- Possible because… (I would expect that this would be the majority view, although many who would stop short of saying God was impossible might nevertheless quite likely profess absolutely zero faith in God)
I don’t know, but I suppose that the most interesting character of all would be the one who says that God lacks any degree of certainty, that God is impossible and also improbable, but who nevertheless claims great faith in God. An uncertain God who is impossible and improbable would indeed require great faith, would He not?
I don’t know, but it seems to me that those who profess the absolute certainty of God, require very little faith. If something is certain and there can be no doubt whatsoever about it, if there is no possiblity whatsoever that something could be false, then what faith is required?
I anticipate a few arguements that might sound something like this
- I have observed all that exists
- I have not observed God
- Therefore, God is not possible
Of course, no man has observed all that exists or even a small fraction of it, so the fallacy of such an arguement is obvious. God might be living on a planet in the next Solar System for all we know. A better arguement might be:
- Men have observed all that men are capable of observing of existence throughout history
- No man has ever observed God
- Therefore, God is not possible
Of course, many men have claimed to have observed God, at least “in the form of…” a burning bush, a messanger he sent, a voice, a pillar of fire, a dream, a flower, a spiders web, etc., etc. I do not recall having read about any claim to actually have seen God, except for Jesus Christ himself, who claimed to be the Son of God and therefore surely must have seen his Father. But otherwise, if anyone has claimed to have seen God directly I missed the claim. And as I recall there was something about Moses or Abraham being told that he would die if he saw God, so, of course that may have something to do with it as well.
It is entirely possible that God is particularly choosey about revealing himself to men. That he just does it extremely rarely and only in very unusual circumstances. And that those men just are reluctant to publish their experience for fear of being labled something rather derogatory.
And also, the mere fact that noone has observed something does not mean that it will not be the very next thing observed. Consider the sequence 1,2,3,… What is next? Most would say “4”. But that does not follow with certainty. 4 would be probable but it is entirely possible that it could be something else completely. For example, “5” the next prime.
The classic arguement
- The sun has risen every day in recorded history
- Tomorrow is a day
- Therefore, the sun will rise tomorrow
However, recorded history is a tiny fraction of the totality of all days that have existed in the past and ever will exist in the future. Will there ever be a day when the sun does not rise? Quite possible. Could it be tomorrow? Entirely possible. Is it probable that the sun will rise tomorrow? Yes, but it is not certain.
A better example, would be the coin toss. If a coin is tossed 9 times and comes up heads each time, then what is the probability that the coin will come up heads on the next toss? 50/50. Just like it is on every single toss. What is the probability that a coin will come up heads 10 times in a row? Highly improbable. A suckers bet. But having already come up heads 9 times in a row, the probability of heads on the next toss is 50/50. Men tend to think that the coin is somehow affected by the previous tosses, but it is not. Anymore than God would be affected by his lack of appearances over the last few thousand years.
So my point is that I don’t know if failure to observe God means that God is impossible. I think it may take a better arguement than that one.
I am also hoping to avoid the “X and not X” arguement. God is both possible and impossible. That self defeating attack on the foundation of logic would be better not presented here, please.
Anyway, I am interested to hear what you think about the possibility of God.