Moderator: Dan~
Exuberant Teleportation wrote:Exuberant Teleportation wrote:Pokemon Trading Card Game Neo Genesis 'Eclipse' (2000) Commercial
Pokemon TCG Neo Destiny Commercial 2002 VHS Vault rip
Complete Neo Genesis Set
Exuberant Teleportation wrote:Neo Genesis Pokemon Cards stack lovely aviator pilot town hero fable legend myth icon greatness enduring eternal dragonfire laser stone potion shine mist stranger Gray Fox.
Exuberant Teleportation wrote:Bandit Keith vs Pegasus Intercontinental championship
Yugioh.com: Yu-Gi-Oh! DM Yugi vs Kaiba
Prismatic567 wrote:Exuberant Teleportation,
Just a note,
I noted you write a lot.
Some of the points do make a lot of sense while the other parts are not justifiable to be real empirically and philosophically.
Have you taken 'hypergraphia' [in varying degrees] into consideration with what you are doing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraphia
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/arti ... iver-words
Even if it is due to 'hypergraphia' [of whatever the degrees] it is essential that one write about things that are justifiable to possible to be real empirically and philosophically since this is a Philosophy forum.
For example, if one write,
Dogs exist - that is justifiable to be real,
but if one extended that to;
"Dogs can fly to space unaided" - that is too much of a stretch.
In this thread you wrote about Spinoza's Ethics which make sense and is opened for philosophical discussion,
but then you bring in all sorts and so much fanciful stuffs, e.g. pokemonic things, etc, then it is impossible for others to follow philosophically. Such stuffs are good for fiction stories but not for philosophical discussion.
However, if you want to write and post the above for your own personal purpose, that is fine, but in general they cannot qualify for philosophical discussions.
Exuberant Teleportation wrote:Prismatic567 wrote:Exuberant Teleportation,
Just a note,
I noted you write a lot.
Some of the points do make a lot of sense while the other parts are not justifiable to be real empirically and philosophically.
Have you taken 'hypergraphia' [in varying degrees] into consideration with what you are doing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraphia
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/arti ... iver-words
Even if it is due to 'hypergraphia' [of whatever the degrees] it is essential that one write about things that are justifiable to possible to be real empirically and philosophically since this is a Philosophy forum.
For example, if one write,
Dogs exist - that is justifiable to be real,
but if one extended that to;
"Dogs can fly to space unaided" - that is too much of a stretch.
In this thread you wrote about Spinoza's Ethics which make sense and is opened for philosophical discussion,
but then you bring in all sorts and so much fanciful stuffs, e.g. pokemonic things, etc, then it is impossible for others to follow philosophically. Such stuffs are good for fiction stories but not for philosophical discussion.
However, if you want to write and post the above for your own personal purpose, that is fine, but in general they cannot qualify for philosophical discussions.
Writing frenzy is always part of my arsenal, but this month, it's been revamped to a whole other caliber, because I was freaking/stressing out about physical (and perhaps mental) evaluations I've been undergoing by the medicine givers, which appeared to be a problem for me, since I used a Pokemon number synchronicity system that I tried to popularize on facebook, which just made people in my community angry and put me on services.
The writing is therapy, to cure the aches and pains in my soul.
I also like the idea of creativity, imagination, and achievement. And I do actually belong on a philosophy forum, because if I tried posting it somewhere else, like on facebook, someone may send the police to my house again.
Return to Religion and Spirituality
Users browsing this forum: Prismatic567