You can’t use argument from ignorance or greatness to justify God…
“We don’t know stuff which can be known, therefor, someone knows it, because it can be known, duh”
That’s not an argument of merit.
The argument from greatness, is “you are a meaningless speck of shit unable to fathom greatness compared to the vastness of the cosmos … But some beings are not, therefor God exists”
Now let’s get real here.
God is defined as supreme creator of everything…
Every dictionary in the world defines God this way.
So God created God??
Then the theists backpedal, from every dictionary in the world and declare that God made everything except God and that God was uncreated, unmade.
Then they use the watchmaker argument to prove God. Contradiction.
We all have this issue called suffering, which is inhabiting a state of being that we don’t want to.
So God makes us be in ways we don’t want to be (creator of all this)
It’s a contradiction of free will that anyone would be in a state of being that they don’t want to be in.
So, we can conclude from the creator hypothesis, that the creator did not endow us with free will .
This conclusion then settles us upon the God hypothesis as automotons, incapable of proving anything about reality, because we only “prove” what we were programmed to prove.
This means a God cannot be proven by us by the logic that we are only programmed to believe whatever we believe.
Logically, God cannot even prove God to us.
Therefor, the point is moot.