WendyDarling wrote:His indictments are baseless regarding Trump and Russia, fishing expedition blanks with absolutely no ties to the election and least of all to Trump who is his primary target. Why can't you accept that he's doing a crap job that's costed the US taxpayers millions of dollars with no caps on his budget and still no evidence of Trump collusion after a year and umpteen indictments into it? In another three years, he'll average another fifty indictments into it and still nothing related to Trump being a Russian operative. Fifteen years from now and two billions dollars spent on his investigation later and no Trump charges, sure everyone else who knows Trump and has ever been Russian or spoken with a Russian will have indictments pending against them for money laundering, fraud, lying under oath to corrupt federal agents, urinating on prostitutes in public, blah, blah, blah, but Trump will still be innocent of collusion.

Note to others:
How is this not the frame of mind embedded in and embodied by the political objectivist? She just
KNOWS.
Wendy,
My question to you is still this: what if you're wrong? What if it turns out that Trump did collude with Putin in order to throw the election his way?
Would that even matter? Again, I suspect that in regard to particular issues near and dear to you, Trump is your man. And towards those ends, any means that he employs either to attain power or to sustain it, is justified.
In other words, there is no sense in really even trying to argue with you about Trump because those particular policies of his are in sync with your own -- and Joker's? -- political prejudices.
And [I suspect further] never in a million years would you consider that perhaps these prejudices are just existential contraptions rooted in dasein. To go down that path is to risk pulling the rug out from under the psychological comfort and consolation of just
KNOWING that the liberal scum are all that separates us from the way the world ought to be run.
Then it's just a question of insisting that you and your kind are the only ones who really, really, really
KNOW what that is.
What you believe, I suspect, pales next to the fact that you
do believe it. It's the rock-solid certainty of your dogmatic narrative that propels your contributions here.
Let's start there, okay? Pick a particular Trump policy that you wholeheartedly embrace and explain to us why any and all who are not "one of us" in regard to it are necessarily wrong about it.