WendyDarling wrote:iambiguous wrote:Fascism? Cue the thugs...
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... cists.html
I think perhaps we might even have a few of them here.
Where are your articles about the AntiFa violent thugs? Who existed first...AntiFa or The Proud Boys?
Yeah, sure, wherever you find objectivists in power there's the potential for thuggery. I'm sure there were thugs on the left when the antifascists and the Nazis waged war in the streets of Germany.
Some no doubt were motivated ideologically by "the cause". And, once you arrive at that point "in your head", there are very few means that can't be rationalized in order to attain and then sustain the noble end.
On the other hand, there is also a nihilistic element embedded in the motivation of some. Being thugs is the whole point for them.
The bottom line here and now though [re this thread] is that it is not the radical objectivists on the left who are in control of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. Government. That's why they don't generate the sort of headlines that Trump's thugs do.
Lucky for you?
You are still basically a right wing objectivist, aren't you?
Let me invite you to bring your moral values and political agenda here: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=194382
Test them as it were.
