## I can prove that 1 = 2

For discussing anything related to physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, and their practical applications.

Moderator: Flannel Jesus

### Re: I can prove that 1 = 2

Silhouette wrote:I don't know why this wasn't an open/shut thread. A nice little trick to figure out, for sure, but it doesn't warrant in depth discussion unless you don't understand it. It certainly doesn't throw numbers into doubt.

Exactly.

Silhouette wrote:
gib wrote:I'm interested in this:

1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + .... = -1/12

This one might warrant discussion though.

It happens when you mess around with infinite series, notably "s = 1-2+3-4+5-6+7-..." and what happens when you add it to itself in a certain way (i.e. add the 1st term to the 2nd, the 2nd to the 3rd and so on) and noting that it results in "t = 1-1+1-1+1-1+1-...", which you have to accept equals a 1/2, because it's an average of whether you "stop" at the last even number in the series or the last odd number in the series.

So adding s to itself... what would this look like?

(1-2+3-4+5-6+7...) + (1-2+3-4+5-6+7...) = 1 + (1-2) + (3-2) + (3-4) ... = 1 - 1 + 1 -1 ... = 1/2

^ Ah, look at that! ^

Silhouette wrote:Accepting these, you can say that 2s = t = 1/2, therefore s = 1/4. I see.
Then you can subtract "s" from the infinite series in question of "u = 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+...", the first term from the first term, the second from the second and so on - nothing special here. You get "u-s = 0+4+0+8+12+0+16+...", so you can factor out the 4 and get "u-s = 4(1+2+3+4+5+6+7+...)", which is "u-s=4u".
This simplifies to "-s = 3u", we know s = 1/4 so "-1/4 = 3u", making our infinite series "u = -1/12".

I see how you get there.

Silhouette wrote:Obviously it rides on the problem of "t". I don't see why you can't add "s" to itself in the way I described above... infinite series extend infinitely so it doesn't matter what order you add each number together. The rest is just standard rearrangement and substitution.

I follow.

I don't think the infinite series "t" has a valid answer, which makes possible such things as "1+2+3+4+5+6+7+..." = -1/12. I'm pretty sure you can make it equal other different values too.

I'm inclined to agree. Saying that 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1... = 1/2 seems to make good folk sense, but I don't think it follows from any arithmetic rule. The series 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1... can be rewritten as (1 + 1 + 1 ...) + (-1 - 1 - 1 - 1 ...), which means infinity plus negative infinity which would give you zero (and maybe you can't even say that). I think we have to assume that in order for the rules of arithmetic to hold, your expressions have to at least be complete. Saying 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, for example, says that when you have 4 of something, and you also have 2 of that something, and one more of that something, you have 7 of that something all together. But how are you supposed to say how much of something you have if you just never stop listing of how many in each group of somethings you have (well, you'd have infinity, but what happens when you include negatives)?
My thoughts | My art | My music | My poetry

In fact, the idea that there's more differences between groups than there is between individuals is actually the fundamental racist idea.
- Jordan Peterson

Here's a good rule of thumb for politics--attribute everything to stupidity unless you can prove malice.
- Ben Shapiro

right outta high school i tried to get a job as a proctologist but i couldn't find an opening.
- promethean75

Ahh... gib, zombie universes are so last year! I’m doing hyper dimensional mirror realities now.
- Ecmandu

gib
resident exorcist

Posts: 9010
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 10:25 pm

### Re: I can prove that 1 = 2

0 is an Arabic trick. Pure magic.

For behold, all acts of love and pleasure are my rituals

Jakob
ILP Legend

Posts: 7193
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:23 pm
Location: look at my suit

### Re: I can prove that 1 = 2

Jakob wrote:0 is an Arabic trick. Pure magic.

0 is the father of infinity, the ultimate mathematical pariah when it comes to application in physics.

For good reason though: as soon as you are dividing by 0, for example, your formula loses its predictive power. Magic indeed.

Funny though, that 0 is such a relief in basic addition and subtraction, although 1 is a God-send when it comes to higher level functions. A better magic trick.

Silhouette
Philosopher

Posts: 4260
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 1:27 am
Location: Existence

### Re: I can prove that 1 = 2

Silhouette wrote: A better magic trick.

Not even a trick, just pure magic.

For behold, all acts of love and pleasure are my rituals

Jakob
ILP Legend

Posts: 7193
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:23 pm
Location: look at my suit

### Re: I can prove that 1 = 2

I used to trick people in high school with these. There are 1=2, 1=0, and -1=1 variations all involving the division by zero.
Serendipper
Philosopher

Posts: 2180
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:30 pm

Previous