Science versus Philosophy

I think this pretty much sums it up. Science needs to be philosophy’s handmaiden, or knight, but not its ruler. It is blind to us, it values only that which it can incorporate entirely, which does not include human nature.

Science also fails to solve the problem of induction, ethics, conceptual tautology, consciousness and most of metaphysics.

I would have to disagree with philosophy as knowledge, direction and power. Philosophy does not accomplish much other than provide new fundamental for new insights, curiosity, arguments or questions for other fields such as the life/natural sciences, mathematics, earth or space sciences, psychology, politics, law and economy.

What is meant by ‘human nature’ ?

You said it my man.

What?