Big Bang and Black Hole.
==…
1.
The big bang theory describes the creation of everything
in the universe. … In just a few seconds, the expansion
caused the singularity to stretch out all across … why-sci.com/big-bang/
2.
The Black Hole That Birthed the Big Bang
/ By Niayesh Afshordi, Robert B. Mann, Razieh Pourhasan on July 15, 2014 / scientificamerican.com/artic … -big-bang/
=======.
1 big bang created the universe
2 black hole ate all masses of big bang’s universe
3 after X-time black hole through far away all BB mass as a singular point
4 new mass – energy cycle began
=====…
“ So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd.”
Book. QED : The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
Page 10, by Richard Feynman. Published: 1985.
================…
That can not be answered, because “singularity” means conditions under which physical “laws” are not defined. It is not possible to get any information out of a “singularity”.
Big bang is scientific fantasy . . . .
===…
According to ‘big bang’ the Universe exists 14 billion years.
Woman gives birth to a reasonable child during 280 days.
A body made up of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
A single human cell contains as much information as a library
with a thousand volumes.
Book: “ The unity of Nature”
“ The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.”
/ page 40, by Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker / de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Frie … %C3%A4cker
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a reasonable child ( by the chance )
during 9 months if according to the Probability theory it is impossible?
By the chance woman must be pregnant more than 14 billion years
before to give life to her reasonable child.
So, before a ‘ big bang’ was an intelligent woman.
She was pregnant and gave life to a child . . . and . . … . .
. . . . after 13.7 billion years and after many generations new children
invented the ‘ big bang’ theory.
=================…
Israel Socratus
There is no actual science concerning any singularity. The Big Bang was pure speculation based upon one skimpy notion (red shift) and since it was introduced it has been merely a religious promotion. There is no actual science to support the idea of the Big Bang and certainly none for the existence of a singularity.
I know much about the biography and the works of the physicist Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker and that he and, for example, Otto Hahn and Werner Heisenberg were members of the "Uranprojekt“ ("Uran Project“) before and during the Second World War.
Sorry, English is not my fisrt language. I meant “physicist” - of course. It is the second time already that I confused the word “physicist” with the word “physician”.
They used to mean the same thing, but split when physics became vogue. Now in English “physician” refers to a medical person (often not an MD, such as Obama-care physicians) and thus separate from science and physical philosophy (PhD).