More Galaxy Model (Universal Fractal)

Electrons are either +1/2 or -1/2.
They don’t switch.
Their spin represents the first choice
for matter at this level: direction of
spin around an axis.
The second choice is when the spinning
disc of axes chooses to precess left or right:
this is the difference between matter and
anti matter.

There are two jets coming from one
galactic Center: look down as you
ride one away, and you’re spinning left;
look down as you ride the other away,
and you’re spinning right. Jets make
matter happen: one makes matter stars,
and the other makes antimatter stars.
These stars’ matter has opposite
cyclonic rotation: therefore they will repel
each other and stay in their own
galactic arm. The numbers of each kind
of arm (antimatter and matter)
will be equal whenever possible
SINCE THERE ARE TWO
OPPOSITELY-SPINNING JETS from each
galactic Centre.

Matter repels antimatter and vice versa.

Ummm… “spin” for electrons has nothing to do with physical spinning. It is a quantum mechanics term originally intended to represent physical spin until they discovered that their model doesn’t work that way. Now “spin” merely refers to some left over energy and compatibility that they had to account for.

If you merely turn a physically spinning object upside down (constantly occurring in the natural world) its spin direction would be reversed. But then how do you know when it is upside down?

Spin me. Around my long axis would
be nice, with my head up, but any
axis will do. You will always be able
to differentiate between one spin or
the other.
Now take the head up axis, rotate it
about its feet at 1, creating a disc that is
also precessing at 2, and you have a
+1/2 electron.
Take the head down electron, rotate it
about its feet at 1, creating a disc that
at the same time precesses at 2, and
you have a -1/2 electron.

Hate to break the news, but electrons have no head or feet.

Everything has parts.
Whoever told you differently
was wrong.

Everything has substance and portions. Not everything has parts.
:sunglasses:

A photon is just a photon. It has no parts. An electron is just an electron. It has no parts. There are other examples too.

James, science is for wannebe geniuses, autists and savants who are skilled at mathematics who use their math to play make believe. Let’s not interrupt their party with common sense and logic. The kids are better at math than me, so let them have their fun, let them dance around town fantasizing they are smarter than mommy or daddy. Who am I to spoil their parade? If they want to roleplay as Jim Carrey from the Number 23 and scribble their numbers all of the proverbial billboards in fit of fury, who am I to spoil it and pop their pride?

It’s a disease. Best to bonsai its ass (aka “nip it in the bud”).

Anyway
What’s cool is that in this scheme of things,
an ‘up’ electron in matter turns out to
be identical to a ‘down’ electron in antimatter!!

So EVERYTHING is half matter and half antimatter!
The antimatter half of matter is simply
UPSIDE DOWN, as is the matter half of
antimatter!

How cool is that idea?

It’s a cool idea. Now go play with your new lego set mommy bought you.

I agree.

With a disc turning once every time
it precesses twice, eg:
http ://users.accesscomm.ca/john/NeonAnimation.GIF
EVERY TWO opposite points travel exactly
the same path

users.accesscomm.ca/john/NeonAnimation.GIF
The Universe is a Fractal
based on atom/galaxy

No. Not mommy but either daddy (if before 1970) or the taxpayers (if since 1970).

Note: Since about 1970 there have been existing almost no children of the middle-class anymore but almost exclusively children of the under-class which are financially supported by the taxpyers, thus the middle-class.

So you are saying mommies don’t buy their kids boy toys, but only give them girl toys? So prior to 1970, women had no jobs and after 1970, the middle class were celibate virgins and all poor people had no jobs but pure welfare only, getting laid more than the middle class?

You used a sterotype in your reply to Helper’s last post, then I used a stereotype in my reply to your reply to Helper’s last post. :wink:

It wasn’t a stereotype, I could have easily replaced it with daddy…
the core it was about the bricks…him creating made-up constructs…