Spherical computers would be better...?

Spherical computers would be better…?

just a thought; if we built an orb or empty sphere of processor multi-cores, then added a clomp of cores in the centre, the computer would then have roughly equivalent connectivity throughout the system. Each module could act like an individual computer, and the main core could compare the results ~ much like how our brain works. That is in the simplest of terms. Computers already work like this, but would the spherical configuration yield anything different?

In rudimentary terms if the device has software which denotes the idea/algorithm, and takes the fastest results [like how it already works], then the arrangement relative to the speed/length of connectivity, would yield the optimum results. No? In other words, each processing module would make e.g. a set of mathematical calculations such to arrive at a given number, then the module which reaches its conclusion first gets ‘listened to’ by the central processor first, thus manifesting the fastest route to a solution. When we do maths in our heads we pretty much do the same thing, running different number patterns [add this, take away that] through the minds eye, and comparing with fits with what.

Can subjectivity be arrived at via the physical arrangement [like in the brain], or is that not required?

_

Cyay Computing, once having the fastest computer in the world used a circle configuration so as to allow for maximum speed between the peripheral components and the main core. Adding the third dimension would allow for even more of that enhancement, but things might get a little inconvenient to construct and maintain.

China currently has the fastest computer in the world clocking at nearly twice as fast as the West’s current fastest. I’m sure that it utilizes the same idea.

Interesting!

Perhaps make the sphere modules into independent geometric objects, kinda like shells/cells? Then you can just add/remove/repair easily, piece by piece, or remove say half of them such to access the central core.

I would also make all them do the processing collectively, so they would all be doing the graphics card function etc. I would equally and contrastingly have them assigned and designed for specific duties too [also like how the brain works]. Graphics would be better if there were separate modules for foreground and background aspects of an image, and computers could then physically denote objects cast against a world/background. This contrasting which occurs in our minds all the time, is something computers xurrently struggle with [identity] [I know they are quite good at recognition, but not anything like as good as humans or probably mice].

_

You would still have the problem of having to disable a large portion of the system to merely get to and replace one tiny piece near the core.

Parallel processing is not merely common practice today, but essential even in microprocessors.

Instead of binary it could be exponentialism. Like the core is 1, then sphere around it has 61/res different options (up down left right z+ and z-) then sphere around it would have previousoptions6*1/res options and so forth.
Kind of like an abacus, where you rotate each shell freely to give more options.

Printing the chips would be no problem, just project the light rays onto a half sphere using a light expander (like globulete of magnifying water or something) then combine both half spheres. Only tricky part is rotating without gimbal lock, but we could just have a total of 4 dimensions instead of 6 and it would still be good.

Your better off with spiral, counter spiral layers, on a horizontal plane of vertical circles.

Allows maximum lattice fractals in every direction, (multiplane) allows heat to drain off vertically, and very easy to pull out and quick repair, sheet by sheet… and minor loss of individual spirals won’t completely destroy the information stored on other spirals… just one glitch.

Take a piece of paper, and make it spiral, it’s rolled up. Add another around it, another, another, another.

Now imagine the paper unfolded. Put a single dot in a corner… it’s allowed to move on the next page in one of 9 different points, retaining it’s symbol.

Now imagine 88,888 symbols on a page, doing this, leap frogging from one page to the next in the series, in base 8.

Very easy to repair, maintain, and expand upon. Spirals work, look at DNA. It combines the concept of planes, 3-D spheres, with spirals, easy msintency, and the creation of neural-numeric sequencing based on Cartesian sense impression, allowing the hardware to incorporate AI in it’s hardware without touching it’s OS, operating symbiotically yet disconnected, save through the need to relate to the preservation and use of information.

Like our brain and the base of a spine, the spine can act instinctively to certain stimuli without the brain. Stegasaurus had two brains.

M-Kay?

The spiral sounds good, and the leapfrogging has to happen whatever positions the processors are in, no? I suppose that instead of a sphere, the best thing would be to map it all out into subsections like a brain is. Perhaps multiple sphere’s with interconnecting fractal arms, or organic shapes may manifest according to requirements.