Science explained.

Nature explains itself. There is already it’s teachings in it’s natural form. Just look at a ball. It’s gravity. It falls. Boom. Nature.

Words confuse things. There is a trap of double meanings. When you read words you must create the right picture in your mind.

Imagination = Reality, Imagination = Nature, but not Physics Reality or Physics Nature

When you imagine things they dont need to obey physics. So why do we use words to explain physical things? When you use words, you rely on brain to correctly picture things. But words are confusing. Sometimes you do not picture things as the author intended or think of the wrong meaning. So your mind is not rendering Physics Reality or Physics Nature, but Imaginary Space.

So when you learn science steps it is best not to focus on the words themselves, because words, they have double meaning. You should try to focus on the authors mindset when he wrote those words. What did he mean with those words? Often times we have a picture in our head but it is tough to write it in words. So scientist authors have a tough time putting pictures into words. So try your best to understand what he meant by those words and his frame of mind, not the words themselves.

Nature=nature. You learn most from nature.
You can only learn from words, if they put the right picture in your head, that matches nature.
Words are more complex than nature, therefore they have a physics of their own, outside of physics nature. Words can create paradox and fantasy land.
Words are like a code derived from physics nature, but are not physics nature, except in the sense that fantasy and imagination land are physics nature.

So what is the point of mathematics? Mathematics is a way to increase efficient, like a computer program simulation. It takes less time to do equations than go out and buy the products to test the equipment. But again, nothing beats the real thing. Mathematics are a simulation, an approximation of physics nature.

The real thing is Nature. If you want to learn Nature, go out and learn Nature. Everything is already there.

Our brains are a miniuniverse where the laws of physics don’t apply. Because we have an outside energy source (the physical universe) our consciousness and Time can exist like a perpetual motion machine without draining our own energy. In fact, it causes itself to exist for no reason other than it cannot (outside of special conditions) not exist.

In fact, the metaphysical realm is so unemperical, that it cannot be measured empirically. Our brains look like a bunch of random nuerons…we cannot actually see what a brain experiences, yet oddly enough we experience our own brains directly, without percieving them as a bunch of random neurons.

So where is the perception? If there is a perceptor, then who is percieving the perceptor? Perhaps it is like a cascade of infinite mirrors. But instead of mirrors, the cascade is powered by backwards timetravel, an entity going back into time percieving itself, but not in the sense of recurrence, it goes only back microseconds, until the horizon itself is pushed slowly forward, the perpetual free energy of Time.

So, in essence, the purpose of words is to awkwardly and inefficiently describe scientific concepts.

Words are best use as labels, ie. pointers which help to assist you to refer to truths…They should not be used in place of truths, which are Nature based.
Ie…words describe metaphysical things…they tell you what an atom is, but you can only know what an atom is until you see a picture of it in your mind, and you can only know that an atom is true if you actually see footage of it in a microscope.

(The only other function of words in understanding physics nature is like a microscope, for instance describing the behavoir of particles we can’t see, but this is only useful in order to explain unpredictable behavoirs of macroobjects. So if we can predict and see the behavoirs, why use words? We can see it and hear it. If we cant see it hear it, or feel it’'s physics nature, then it is metaphysical.)

Quantum physics is kind of a metaphysical concept, as it’s premise is the effect than it cannot be measured accurately. However, we still rely on the machine data to measure quantum interactions, so it is less reliance on words, and more reliance on Nature.

However, words are the easiest bridge to discussing metaphysical things, until such technology comes out to project consciousness realtime.

I find that the truth of metaphysical things is often measured by how flamboyant it is.

For instance, if I have a curious thought about the meaning of life, and how we got here, it is only a passing thought, I don’t know if it is true or not. So I think about it for a little while and move on to other theories.

But, instead, I could take this passing thought, turn on some epic Hans Zimmer music in the background, and play some HD footage from some movies, and “boom” upon watching the movie, it’s as if I discovered the meaning of life. Brilliant.