russel bartand paradox

If there existed a possibility/capability of creating everything.
then should there be possibility of creating nothing.

If there is no possiblity /capability of creating nothing,
then how come one can claim to ahve cpapability of creating everything.

If he created nothing , then the possibility of creating everything becomes incomplete.
If tried to cread nothing as some part of everything , then both cant accomodate each other meaning.

the following example is literally applicable or entirely existence wise tell me :

good example for bad example is bad example for bad example .

bad example for bad example is good example for bad example

both good example and bad example becomes applicabe for BAD EXAMPLE.