Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:James S. Saint wrote:Okay, now given that you have 10 cups with the random possibility of each cup having as many as 10 coins in it, what is the possibility that you have the same number of coins in all 10 cups?

Mathematically that would be (1/10)^10 or 0.0000000001.

Actually it would be (1/10)^9, I believe.

If you begin with

2 cups, you have (1/10)^

2With

3 cups, you have (1/10)^

3And with

10 cups, you have (1/10)^

10Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote: Well, let's define the term as the specific infinite series,

infA ≡ [1+1+1+...]

Just a single infinite line would give us infA^2 points on that line

Where did you get that equation from?

It is an ontological definition ("≡"), not an equation.

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:All of your maths are incorrect sir.

Well, I have been known to make mistakes, but you'll have to show me exactly where.

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:An infinite line, is infA.

An infinite plane, is infA^2

Yes, and an infinite cube is infA^3

..unless you are using the

real-number system so as to include decimals, then it is infA^

6.

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:An infinite line has no need for a step value, because it is infinite.

That statement doesn't appear to make any sense. If by "step-value" you mean one infinitesimal, such is a matter of choice and ontological definition/declaration. Any amount can be used as long as it is consistent throughout.

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:A. The equation is infinite line/stepvalue. Stepvalue=smallest possible particle in the universe*amount of possible particles/total particle count. (This is greyed, because it is an iterative function. The whole process from step A to B is repeated*amount of possible particles. The first iteration the value is 1/1. After subsequent iterations, the value is the amount of possible particles/index. Index starts at 1, and increases by 1 each iteration. The graphs will indicate which particle count ratios are indicative of which probabilities. From there, we can cross reference them to mass estimations and then cross reference them to localised observations.)

It has nothing to do with particles. And even if it did, what happens when you divide the smallest thing (an infinitesimal) into an infinite thing? You get

infA^2.

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:Secondly, the universe is finite. We add a value, finiteline, equalling the diameter of the universe.

Time is a dimension, so we have that to add in the equation's flux. For now, the time is finite.

The equation is now (finiteline/stepvalue)*(timeline/timestep)

I'm afraid with that, you got into a little too much nonsense for me. And the universe is

NOT finite. What makes you think that it is?

Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony ElseFrom THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.It is not merely "

do what works", but "

to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".

As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.

Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "

The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".

.