Page 10 of 10

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 2:42 pm
by Jakob

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 2:49 pm
by Jakob
Eureka though cause this explains the diversity of species. They don't evolve primarily based on functionality, but on having attained a recognizable style.

When it changes from "what the fuck is this guy doing" to "holy fuck, look at this guy".

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:07 pm
by Pedro I Rengel
Where will to power arrives, there God is. But will to power never arrives. Does a photon have style?

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:44 pm
by Jakob
No a photon like everything else that can impact anything I think is in style.

This may also be how we need to look at dark matter. It is potential mass that isn't in style at the moment.

It could hypothetically flip into style.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:45 pm
by Jakob
Maybe thats how levitation works.

It would have to be like directly transmuting antimatter into magnetism.

But then it would have to be a nuclear reaction of the antimatter, acquiring EM properties simply by disintegrating.

But forget all this. Its only style if it happens.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:17 pm
by Jakob
Capable wrote:As for c^2, I surmised it’s because c being equal to the value of energy as such, since a photon is simply unmassed energy, you square it to push that value into another dimension, like building a square out of a straight line. 2^2=4, 3^2=9, c^2= matter. More specifically, matter = c^2 - c^2/m, since existing m (matter) derived from loss of c as pure energy and that subtracts from the pure energy value squared into dimensional existence.

If anyone has style, it’s god.

http://beforethelight.forumotion.com/t1 ... -the-world

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:21 pm
by ExtraCoronas
Style is the instantaneous translation of oneself as “aspects” into pure information as Image, so style exists on all levels and is recognized by others with similar style, which doesn’t need to mean possessing it. Culture for example, biology for another, are things born of style and thus produce beings able to recognize that, even if those beings lack the style themselves insofar as lacking coherent self integrity to adequately organize their various aspects into the Image.

Image is an idea that orders from top down but generates from bottom up, as consequence; separation is in time and space causality looped so that like matter and energy a balance is struck.

Leftism being entropy, it represents free energy unable to organize as matter any coherent idea and this dissolves ideas, which is also why leftists have no Image and no style, except in countries with heavy “people presence” to cultural bottom up valuing integrity, eg Cuba or Venezuela.

When culture is corporatized and democratized like in America and places in Europe, and thus no longer ontically integrated at and as person to person levels, style vanishes and becomes pure simulation. Eg Obama. Real style is never a veil or mask for power, it is a signifier of power, the crystallization of power as such into culture. Style is indifferent to power because it already is power.

“Yo”.

(Tilts sunglasses)

Style is what happens when power adopts responsibility.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:13 pm
by Exuberant Teleportation
The interesting thing about this theory is that it was forged by connecting preexisting components of knowledge rather than in a laboratory. To THINK, to IMAGINE, that's the real power.

Imagination opens doors to the inconceivable, to the utterly extreme, to visualize edges of the game board that totally revolutionize the playing field. Such outlandish ideas shatter the old projections, and give us a new powerhouse to upgrade all the way to the highest bastion.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:35 pm
by Ecmandu
Jakob wrote:
Capable wrote:As for c^2, I surmised it’s because c being equal to the value of energy as such, since a photon is simply unmassed energy, you square it to push that value into another dimension, like building a square out of a straight line. 2^2=4, 3^2=9, c^2= matter. More specifically, matter = c^2 - c^2/m, since existing m (matter) derived from loss of c as pure energy and that subtracts from the pure energy value squared into dimensional existence.

If anyone has style, it’s god.

http://beforethelight.forumotion.com/t1 ... -the-world


How do you get a speed greater than the cosmological constant by adding dimensions?

That just means that it's not the cosmological constant.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:33 pm
by Jakob
Indeed and that is a meaningless term anyway, isn't it? Sublime arrogance to posit something like this. It is merely a measure and a very reliable one.

But the speed is not quadratic qua its velocity, but qua its reach. It now works in three dimensions rather than two (all in a great 4d curvature) and thus has to do a lot more work to be. It can't afford to go anywhere now, it must constantly be going into itself to even exist. Like us, humans and anything that requires its own activity to keep existing, anything in which energy is trapped.

A photon does the same in its waveform, going into its own mean, as Abstract remarked.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:42 pm
by Jakob
ExtraCoronas wrote: Style is what happens when power adopts responsibility.

Or it might be said, considering that style is indifferent to power beyond what it represents, which is a realm of power, that style is what happens when power and responsibility meet. It is the zone in which hey are allowed to meet. Actuality-at-large.

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 2:01 pm
by Jakob
Style is indeed nonmaterial, it can not be defined in terms of the elements used to attain it, it is in the relationship of these elements, the same way it is with cosmos.

Style and Cosmos are akin.
They are a meta-order, within which discernible concrete orders occur.

If it isn't for the grand identifier of Style, it isn possible to discern whether something is orderly or chaotic.

One mans chaos is another mans order. It depends on the persons life-style.
The speed of light and its bearing on gravity thus pertains to the style of this universe, and Einsteins creation relies foremost on his very great sense of Style. And this goes for all great logic and mathematics; elegance is the first prerequisite for such cold truth.

Why efficient synthetic mathematical arguments are invariably beautiful.


So how did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

The answer is ready to be grasped now.