How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

For discussing anything related to physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, and their practical applications.

Moderator: Flannel Jesus

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby James S Saint » Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:59 am

Void_X_Zero wrote:The logic of self-valuing is also basic. What could exist which does not hold itself in existence by using that which it is as a standard of selection for its interactions?

Well, it has become obvious that FC can no longer rationalize his pet project, perhaps you can put together a valid ontology for him. If you believe that you can, please have at it. I would rather him succeed through the intelligence of others than fail via the demonics of his environment.

I had asked FC a few very relevant questions (which he was too brain-dead to answer):
James S Saint wrote:What is between one self-valuing and another? Nothingness? How much? How big? How dense? How does it move?

Can you perhaps help him out, because without those answers, he doesn't actually have an ontology at all.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby Fixed Cross » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:10 pm

Unbelievably silly.

Obviously there is nothing "between" self valuings.
The whole point to an ontology is to figure out how phenomena relate to each other, how they are grounded in each other.

"AO" is just a cheap extremely silly trick of words "oh, uhhhh.... well, it touches, so existence it called touchiness". RM is "Touchiness ontology".

Obviously one self valuing relates to another through..... wait for it.... valuing.

Euhr.

James, your stupidity is even more demonic than your dishonesty.
Your ontology will be forgotten as soon as you leave this green Earth.
Mine is already ruling the heads of quite a bunch of intelligent people, who are even so still struggling to really grasp the core that VO points to - as it points to the very depths of their own truthfulness, which most of them have not yet discovered the courage to access. VO draws out courage and sends those who lack it into convulsions, an careers them, brings out great hostility and insanity - like Trump, who is a good example of the logic.

Your "relevant" questions are too stupid to fathom. If an ontology holds a specific principle as the fundamental unit, what kind of idiot would ask what is between these units?

AO does not pertain to any real world object. It is a failed, completely infantile, debilitated form of hyper-simplification.
VO pertains to any observable object, and allows us to take that object as a fixed value and define and decipher the workings of everything around it.

VO allows us to take any entry point in reality and induce the character of its environment. AO allows us to do precisely nothing - except as James demonstrates, behave like a retard with Tourettes disease.

All these questions you asked are answered by physics. Unlike AO, VO works with physics, and with all exact sciences. VO in fact integrates all physics. It is the logic of both Relativity and QM, as Ive explained hundreds of times by now.

Apparently it is too powerful to be shared freely. It just doesn't compute with people that they would be granted such a powerful tool without having earned it. And logically, VO itself is among the strictest of all self-valuings - it does not compute with falsehood, weakness, and certainly not with stupidity. But all these are the same things - the absence of integrity.

All comments from haters following this post predictable do not include any logical arguments, and a lot of personal insults. That is what you get for actually creating something. But its only right that bad people should not be capable of appreciating something truly, fundamentally and irreversibly good.

This is the last post these trolls will get the opportunity to warm themselves on - you see how quickly James got here. People in the future will be surprised that I remained here so long, in the least appreciative environment possible - the reasons will remain in the dark, except to those who have grasped Nietzsche.
Last edited by Fixed Cross on Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Thunderbolt steers all things.

Image

I've been guided somewhat by William Blake's quote: "I must create a system or be enslaved by another mans; I will not reason and compare: my business is to create". Just change 'system' for 'style'. - Bill

The strong do what they can, the weak accept what they must.
- Thucydides
User avatar
Fixed Cross
Doric Usurper
 
Posts: 6866
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:53 am
Location: Thrudheim

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby James S Saint » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:30 pm

Your jealousy makes you into such a deep hearted and egocentric liar.

The simple truth is that you don't actually have an ontology at all. "The universe is made of self-valuing" does NOT comprise an ontology. It was only a beginning for you many years ago, from which you have made no actual progress.

You merely lust to be worshiped as a god. Earning any such worship never even crossed your mind.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby Mithus » Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:09 pm

James, why do you still bother with this megalomaniac nutcase?

(And FC, I'm not one of your "haters". You aren't worth such a deep emotion)
..... panta rhei .............................................
User avatar
Mithus
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:05 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby James S Saint » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:35 am

Fixed Cross wrote:Mine is already ruling the heads of quite a bunch of intelligent people

Sorry, but totally selfishness was driving "quite a bunch of intelligent people", long, long before you were born. You haven't added anything but the erroneous word "ontology".
Mithus wrote:James, why do you still bother with this megalomaniac nutcase?

The "good guys" avoid condemnation at every reasonable opportunity, often long after the simple minded have long since chosen to hate. Some people actually grow up from being slapped. But then, some do not. It's a calculated risk. :-?
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby surreptitious75 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:03 am

James wrote:
Energy is not Mass. Energy is the ability to accomplish or affect. Mass is the ability to possess inertia

Energy is the ability to perform work but it is not only moving objects that have this ability but static
ones as well. Therefore the fact they are static makes zero difference. In that respect energy is mass
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN
surreptitious75
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 5:48 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby James S Saint » Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:11 am

surreptitious75 wrote:
James wrote:
Energy is not Mass. Energy is the ability to accomplish or affect. Mass is the ability to possess inertia

Energy is the ability to perform work but it is not only moving objects that have this ability but static
ones as well. Therefore the fact they are static makes zero difference. In that respect energy is mass

What does being "static" have to do with anything we were talking about? A static potential has no mass.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby surreptitious75 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:58 pm

James wrote:
A static potential has no mass

I have no idea what a static potential is but static objects have both mass and energy and energy equals mass
Energy may only be used when an object is in motion but still exists within the object when it is not in motion
Because an object without energy would not be able to move at all
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN
surreptitious75
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 5:48 pm

Re: How did Einstein arrive at E=mc^2?

Postby James S Saint » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:38 pm

surreptitious75 wrote:
James wrote:
A static potential has no mass

I have no idea what a static potential is but static objects have both mass and energy and energy equals mass
Energy may only be used when an object is in motion but still exists within the object when it is not in motion
Because an object without energy would not be able to move at all

Well, you have the words, but...

A stationary mass can be broken up such as to release EMR energy. As a stationary mass, it can do no work and thus has no energy. Mass and energy are NOT the same thing. Mass is a property of inertia and/or point of gravitational migration. That is not the same as "ability to do work".

There is "potential energy" such as a voltage or a gravitational displacement which has the ability to do work only when released to do so. Thus a mass is a type of "potential energy" storage incapable of doing work until the inner EMR is released. The amount of work stored within a mass can be calculated by E=mc^2.

In all cases, the EMR is doing the "work". Even gravitational migration is due to ultra-minuscule EMR. But EMR has no mass, no inertia (by concurrent definition of inertia). Energy doesn't equal mass and mass doesn't equal energy. Mass is a storage mechanism of energy that possesses inertia. Work is accomplished through EMR, void of mass/storage.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Previous

Return to Science, Technology, and Math



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users