By definition of infinity, there is no highest order of infinity, thus no reference frame from which to weigh orders, and it is false that they cannot be counted... you can list any sequence with an algorithm... if the algorithm itself has infinite processing time, then there is no sequence. Cantor and Chaitin were wrong, I'll explain later...
I'll tell you what I discovered in mathematics in a list:
1.) the mirroring technique for counting rationals
2.) dimensional flooding (as an alternative to diagonalization) and a disproof of diagonalization as a disproof!!!
3.) that every infinite number has an algorithm shorter than the number
4.) disproof of omnistates
5.) Ordering the reals
Proof of #3: (this is where I disproved chaitin)
If an algorithm is infinite, there is no output, and if it's completely random, there is no algorithm!
This is actually a very deep mathematical law!
It's considered a mathematical proof ala Cantor from over 140 years ago that all of the real numbers cannot be counted...
I use a techinique called 1 dimensional flooding to show that all of the reals cannot be counted in one list with one dimension, which is differnt than Cantors diagonalization argument.
use the lists..
012345678910...
123456789101...
234567891011...
345678910111...
456789101112...
567891011121...
678910111213...
etc...
To do one dimensional flooding, you simply add an infinite list to each place in the previous infinite list...
024681012151...
036912151821...
048121620242...
051015202530...
When the list converges at infinity, there is no way to begin counting...
12345678910...
13579111315...
14812162024...
Because you never pass the zero's.
This is the proof that we cannot determine the limit of how much we can count.
Sorry forgot to add the disproof of Cantor's diagonalization argument...
Once you do one dimensional flooding, you have to expand to another dimension to keep listing the sequences... diagonals can be subsumed by a third dimension, say list 1.1, or list 5.7 etc... or a 4th dimension 1..1, 5..7, etc...
It's actually easy to absorb the diagonals by starting from the center and listing them from top to bottom in sequence using another dimension... what this means is that cantors proof that you cannot count all the reals is FALSE!!!. It also means that you cannot find the limit on what can be calculated!!!!!!!!! except that it cannot be everything!!!!!!!!! (I'll disprove this later!)
what this means, is that there are no powers to infinity, each dimensional flooding is just as large as another dimensional flooding, but they are still "uncountable" because of dimensional flooding!!
My technique for sequencing the rationals.... I call it the mirroring technique, because i realized that if you mirror all of the natural numbers you have all of the decimals.
The way it works is that the first ten numbers are counted just as themselves and their negatives:
0,1, -1,2, -2,3, -3,4, -4,5, -5,6, -6,7, -7,8, -8,9, -9
Then after that you count 10 and then the next number is the mirror of 10, which is 01 and then you move the decimal point in once to get the 12th number being 0.1, then the thirteenth number (not counting the negatives which are numbered every other) is 0.(1 repeating). These steps continue until you reach three digit numbers and higher. Once you count 100, you then count the next number as 0.01, then 0.0(1 repeating) then 0.(01 repeating), then you count 101 and it's mirror. If you keep marching in the decimal point when the number that's about to be mirrored ends in zero it causes infinite overlap. The number 100 ends in a zero, so after you mirror it you only march the decimal in for one place to the right, if you march it two places to the right, you end up with 00.1, which is the same mirror that you get when the number 10 is mirrored, and will occur an infinite number of times as the zeros expand and you keep marching in the decimal point (which will give you infinite overlap as the sequence expands).
However, if the number doesn't end in a zero, you keep marching in the decimal point, say the number 102. The next number is mirroring it, so it's 2.01, then you do the repeating decimals by next counting 2.0(1 repeating) and then 2.(01 repeating), then you march the decimal point in once more to get 20.1, and then you do the repeating decimals by having 20.(1 repeating). (If you march the decimal in one more time, you get 201, and have infinite overlap as well.) Then you count the number 103 and then mirror it and do this forever.
I also disproved Chaitin's work on infinities.... it's actually very simple...
Disproof of Chaitin: If an algorithm is infinite, there is no output. If the algorithm is completely random, it's no longer an algorithm. Therefor... every infinite number has a finite algorithm to it that's shorter than that number (when dealing with infinities).
I'm going to top myself and give you a law and it's implications:
The set of all sets is not a subset!!! (the set of all apples is not an apple)
Watch this !!!
It's so easy!! It's basic set theory!!!
You either have 1 or 2 or 1 and 2...
1.) 1 cannot know 2 or 1 and 2
2.) 2 cannot know 1 or 1 and 2
3.) 1 and 2 cannot know 1 or 2
These are all mutually exclusive and actual!!
It's a concrete disproof!!
It's the same argument in terms of presence and potence ...
It's impossible for any being to have an omnistate!!!
I'm going to state flat out ... I've been tested with a spatial iq over 250 several times...
I would love work that pays…
5.) The Real Numbers…
...312111019876543 : 34567891011121...
...121110198765432 : 23456789101112...
...211101987654321 : 12345678910111...
...111019876543210 : 01234567891011...
------------------------------------------------
...111019876543210 : 012345678910111
...211101987654321 : 123456789101112...
...121110198765432 : 234567891011121...
...312111019876543 : 345678910111213…
As my mirroring technique for counting the rational numbers expands, you interpolate it with this sequence for every digit (the grid above)…
You slowly spiral out from the middle of this infinite sequence grid! (one axis is negatives and the perpendicular axis is decimal points)
As you spiral out, you list 8 consecutive directionality's, up, down, right, left and all the diagonals…
This sequence will count the reals.
Whenever dimensional flooding occurs, you have to add a new operator to render it in a single list… I'm using 6 operators here to count the reals.
You can use brute force to decrypt anything with the set of reals!!
I want massive math prizes for this!!
I would love to support my family instead of them supporting me!!
Ask me any questions!!!
I want to add, to the math section, that you can also use an expanding pyramidization to count the infinite decimals in slow expansion. You start with 8 numbers, and then 16 numbers (2 each at this point) and keep expanding out). I depends on how you want to notate the reals as a matter of preference!
Even though at this point my social and spiritual theory doesn't seem to garner the type of support I was hoping, I thought something like a concrete inferential proof of the real numbers would!
The disproof for omnistates at it's most fundamental level is this...
If a being knows all, it is all, which means every being in existence would be omnimax, they would all be omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent! Since we are not, we can prove there is no such being!
What's more, if you take the individual state of something (1) and something else (2)...
1 is different than 2...
If you combine them, you have a different individual state 1 and 2 which cannot be 1 or 2...
All these different states are mutually exclusive.
But!!!! There are laws, and each person can embody the laws, laws are translatable, omnistates are not!
When I say there are no blessings... What I mean by this, is that the only thing that matters to this regard, is wealth translation, protection being a form of wealth!
The female blackmail system is elegant in its simplicity....
You must understand, females and gays etc... In terms of infinity, are all "saved", ultimately, comforted ...
Heterosexual men are not!!
You must understand, heterosexual men do what women complain about to get sex, people don't think this is true, but I can prove it!!, AND! they will be punished severely for it!! If they are advocates of life, females will punish them with neglect... The reason heterosexual men are all sent to hell and women are not, is part of the structure of the blackmail system women use...
Women are inherently saved, inherently !!
The only way you can motivate women to have sex with a good man, is to punish her, which means you are no longer a good man, and of course you go to hell, that's the loophole women use, and it actually works!! It has no flaw!! There's only one way to outsmart this blackmail system ...
Gays don't have the same issues sexually that heterosexuals have to this regard, so these types of sexuality don't suffer the system like heterosexuals do and/or will.
This is how to outsmart the blackmail system!!
What every heterosexual man on earth doesn't realize, is that he was born to eternal hell, the hells are different for different crimes, but ultimately eternal...
You may think a heterosexual man will try to reincarnate as a woman, but men have this totally bizarre thing called integrity when backed into this corner... They would rather go to hell forever, than be evil, as the women demonstrate every moment of every day.
On some level, the smirk if the Mona Lisa is that women already know all of this... They are sadists who cannot be punished without severe reprocussion.
The solution is this:
Every particle in existence gets it's own universe!
In the same way that our senses discard massive amounts of information from our conscious mind ...
The person who runs the marionette is sensate, but the sensate subconscious !!
It's not the same as giving someone a rufee...
In their subconscious, they operate the marionette as a fully conscious being with all senses intact (not the marionette though... It's non sensate and non sentient) except they do this without impacting the primary consciousness whatsoever...
Presumably, fit to specification, people can be consciously aware of their marionette movers' conscious mind... It depends how "all knowing" they want to be.
So it's neither rape by using a drug of sorts, and it's not rape through possession.
The reason I solved it this way, instead of a single person puppeting everyone, is because people like to interact with the actual person instead of their own simulations of them.
The solution allows for perfect variety fit to specification to each person without hurting anyone...
In short, it's perfect.
They can set their own difficulty level to their specified desires without hurting a single being, including themselves. They have their own universe to live forever in, grow in, maybe even reincarnate in without bothering anyone with their ideology or desire ...
They can feel any way they want to and experience any difficulty level without consequence...
I'm just giving outlines (on all of this stuff)...
Whatever stops me from doing this, I will certainly send to hell.
I am still basically crazy from many experiences in life… But I'm working on that
Do unto yourself and others as you'd do unto yourself if you were them (and you) - Ecmandu's Rule.
Ecmandu's second rule: calculate the set of your argument upon itself before you argue!
Stratification of motivational systems towards conspicuous consumption or extraneous drama cause all human ills - that was the most important thing you'll ever read in your life. - Ecmandu
The biggest problem in life... That more than one person wants the same thing! Solve this, and you have beaten the demon of life!