every counter has another counter. For every attack, there is a counterattack, every counterattack, another counterattack and thus a counterattack until it becomes blurred movement of counter-counter-counter-counter-counter-counter, repetitively.
every bankruptcy of Trumps was a legitimate counter to to attempts to ruin and diminish his business.
I would wager that those three bankruptcies of his that he filed were before the laws were changed; before the changing of those laws, you could file for bankruptcy and not be out anything, preserve your fortunes. There are many illegitimate business tactics in the world and just because Trump made use of one to preserve his business empire; in fact used it three times; might only be a successful counter against tactics that were far more illegitimate and the fact further persists that since the loophole was accepted as legitimate before the law was changed by the fact that bankruptcy law was changed, it was thus considered a very legitimate move.
If by 'conflicting statement emissions fluctuating tweet by tweet,' you mean that Trump has given conflicting statements through social media that has made it hard for so many 'followers' to get a bead on his business plans or how he conducts himself, I would call that another legitimate tactic that again preserves his business and protects it from those that would tear it to pieces.
'Sleeping with presumptive bad fellows'. 'Presumptive' being the operative term. Is it not also common knowledge and practice to keep your friends close and your enemies closer?
If his true constituency is not ill-informed, but the ill-informed has greater power to give and yet are barbaric, twisted, performing bad business practice after bad business practice, is it bad business practice to leave them ill-informed, to draw their power from them and not just preserve his own business empire, but those of other legitimate businesses world-wide? That, too, is the mark of leadership.
Trump, for all his vagina grabbing and seizing of ass-ets, has still made it into the white house. I had marveled over peoples ability to focus more on the Monica Lewinski scandal of Bill Clinton's Presidency rather than his reducing the national debt close to getting it back in the green instead of the red, but I've since realized that that in itself, while a form of good money management, would have ruined America's ability to continued business with the rest of the world that hates our arrogant asses and loves the loaded gun to their heads at times because they love us all the same. Having an 'office pop' like Monica Lewinski has been considered politically sound since the days of Jack the Ripper back in the 1880's. In fact, it is one of my ongoing and yet to be disproven theories that Jack the Ripper himself was a political-killer-for-hire to cover up the affairs of politicians by killing their 'whores'. His disappearance from the London theme in 1888 coincided greatly with the emergence of American Politics in the world, a world he would not have been safe in even then as those who hired him in London would have wanted a tying up of loose ends. Which, greatly also coincided with the emergence of western culture in America and my belief that the cultured intellectual behind the namesake of Jack the Ripper departed as far west into America as he could; a feat that was followed up on nearly 2 centuries later by german immigrants fleeing with jewish sympathizers into the western culture of America with the bloodline of Hitler, which I have theorized to have been synonymous with the bloodline of Jesus Christ. However, the point that I'm making, is that too much has been the focus on sexual harassment that people have not been able to flirt at all without fear of legal reprisal; that our modern culture is starting to drain for romance being, now, almost synonymous with stalking and creeper-status and our 'American Family Values' of a man and woman and two children, a boy and a girl, is not as realistic as a vision as we'd like and has been needing an upgrade since before the nuclear wars began.
Trump and Hilary both knew they could say and do whatever the hell they wanted to in the running for presidency and that it wouldn't matter; which was great because they weren't in control of all of the shit that came out of their mouths, which coincides with emerging concepts of mass-consciousness and synchronicity and mass-media and it's viewing audiences and the energies that are circulating.
Both Hilary and Trump were caught in old arguments they didn't believe in again, a constantly shifting flux of energy and other thought processes and this, if you paid attention much at all to their presidential runs and their media representations, caused a very inconsistent theme in both platforms that can only be deemed as 'insane' by any sane viewer. And yet, both are still completely sane and sound of mental health.
Trump is far more than an emergency fill. I could give credible evidence to support this, citing his show 'The Apprentice', citing his parents, who have come from money and left him with money; citing Doonesbury comics that while comic and not to be taken fully seriously, do show trump to have been rubbing elbows with politics since the days of George Bush Sr., at the very least and probably before then as well.
I can guarantee that in any conversation or debate on the subject, I can prove Trump to be far more knowledgeable, far more of a better fit for the position and that it is, by all means, a step down in term of power and wealth around the world for him to be filling the presidential role he now fills for America.
"Everybody says ["I don't want to die alone"]. But in my experience, push comes to shove... it isn't the "alone" part people want to avoid. It's the dying."
--Cletus Kasady (Earth-616)