There is no such thing as love or romance.

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:32 pm

Image
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:42 pm

I'll be at college sometimes eavesdropping on conversations by women attending to become doctors and nurses listening to them how they're mentally dumb as a box of rocks where the only reason they're attending is because their rich daddies are putting them through college more likely free of charge.

I think to myself that given the option of medical treatment by them I would probably just rather die on a gurney bed untreated because I wouldn't let them touch me with a ten foot pole.

These bitches would be better off staying at home making a man a sandwich. 8)
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby promethean75 » Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:25 pm

i think that's the wrong attitude to have about those babes, dude. first of all everybody born after 95 talks like that: 'so then i was like and he was like and omg i know!' the high speech of king edward the fourth no longer serves a legitimate function in modern society because things aren't as deep, philosophical or passionate as they used to be. well i mean things were never really 'deep', just made to be thought of that way by very intelligent people with a lot of spare time. fortunately our dear post-structuralists have demolished that era of sesquipedalian nonsense-by-lamplight and today anybody who still talks that way is given mock poetic pardon and not much more. besides, htf (how the fuck) do you expect those babes to talk? 'omg erasmus was a total precursor to the baconian iconoclasm to come of the enlightenment and the military mobilization effects of capitalism described by chomsky were nominally inferential!' you leave that kind of talk to meno and let those girls do their thing, man. the fact that they talk like actresses from some lame TV series is no indication that they lack the necessary intelligence to become doctors and nurses.

and of course they're all a bit immodest, but that's not their fault. this comes with the western territory. they were taught to act that way by subliminal consumerist herd-organizational and administrative forces... even as far back as elementary school when they learned that the cool kids always wore brand name clothing and had wireless earbuds for their mp3 players. none of this is their fault. you put those same girls over in north korea and they'd be playing totalitarian tangos on classical guitars at that age instead of staring at themselves in their bedroom mirror (with christmas lights strung around the frame) for sixteen straight minutes while submerging themselves into an emotionally charged fantasy constructed by the lyrics of a taylor swift song. THIS IS UHMERICA, bro, and this is how it works.

if you want to blame anybody for such disingenuous behavior, blame plato.
promethean75
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:37 pm

promethean75 wrote:i think that's the wrong attitude to have about those babes, dude. first of all everybody born after 95 talks like that: 'so then i was like and he was like and omg i know!' the high speech of king edward the fourth no longer serves a legitimate function in modern society because things aren't as deep, philosophical or passionate as they used to be. well i mean things were never really 'deep', just made to be thought of that way by very intelligent people with a lot of spare time. fortunately our dear post-structuralists have demolished that era of sesquipedalian nonsense-by-lamplight and today anybody who still talks that way is given mock poetic pardon and not much more. besides, htf (how the fuck) do you expect those babes to talk? 'omg erasmus was a total precursor to the baconian iconoclasm to come of the enlightenment and the military mobilization effects of capitalism described by chomsky were nominally inferential!' you leave that kind of talk to meno and let those girls do their thing, man. the fact that they talk like actresses from some lame TV series is no indication that they lack the necessary intelligence to become doctors and nurses.

and of course they're all a bit immodest, but that's not their fault. this comes with the western territory. they were taught to act that way by subliminal consumerist herd-organizational and administrative forces... even as far back as elementary school when they learned that the cool kids always wore brand name clothing and had wireless earbuds for their mp3 players. none of this is their fault. you put those same girls over in north korea and they'd be playing totalitarian tangos on classical guitars at that age instead of staring at themselves in their bedroom mirror (with christmas lights strung around the frame) for sixteen straight minutes while submerging themselves into an emotionally charged fantasy constructed by the lyrics of a taylor swift song. THIS IS UHMERICA, bro, and this is how it works.

if you want to blame anybody for such disingenuous behavior, blame plato.


I like Plato God damn it! :)


A majority of women and females are fucking mentally retarded or stupid but I won't tell them that to their faces directly because at the end of the day I want the chance in their pants to fuck them. :evilfun:

I'll tell an idiotic gibbering moronic beautiful looking woman she's a genius if it means I can bend her over and get some snatch.

But truthfully when there isn't a single woman around in an environment of men only a majority of females are imbeciles and that's it. :wink:
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby promethean75 » Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:46 pm

I like Plato God damn it!


good, good. this is the first step in PA (platonists anonymous). we ask that you admit your problem first. only then can we begin working on your recovery.
promethean75
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:47 pm

promethean75 wrote:
I like Plato God damn it!


good, good. this is the first step in PA (platonists anonymous). we ask that you admit your problem first. only then can we begin working on your recovery.


:lol:
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Nov 13, 2019 8:42 pm

"like totally, like oh my god! like wuuuuuuut??"

I'm pretty sure Plato would point-out the idiosyncratic derivations of to what "like" refers to, and expound upon the use of referring directly to the original occurrence of the subject of contention. Furthermore, Plato would be concerned with imitations and pretense of "love and romance" versus the "real-thing", to which Prom alluded to already, that "real-love" is something rather special and rare, and probably, only capable of unique souls (probably Men), who give the seduction process an 'Artistic' twist which inspires others, rich and poor alike. In other words, when a male and female (or just the male), is strongly and evidently "passionate", then this is the "original-copy" of love, not a derivation, not a copy, not an imitation, but "the real-thing", and the same reference to which people commonly mistake, "I want a real man" or "I want a real woman", of substance.

Identifying what that 'substance' is, is the question.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2146
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:51 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:"like totally, like oh my god! like wuuuuuuut??"

I'm pretty sure Plato would point-out the idiosyncratic derivations of to what "like" refers to, and expound upon the use of referring directly to the original occurrence of the subject of contention. Furthermore, Plato would be concerned with imitations and pretense of "love and romance" versus the "real-thing", to which Prom alluded to already, that "real-love" is something rather special and rare, and probably, only capable of unique souls (probably Men), who give the seduction process an 'Artistic' twist which inspires others, rich and poor alike. In other words, when a male and female (or just the male), is strongly and evidently "passionate", then this is the "original-copy" of love, not a derivation, not a copy, not an imitation, but "the real-thing", and the same reference to which people commonly mistake, "I want a real man" or "I want a real woman", of substance.

Identifying what that 'substance' is, is the question.



It's basically what happens when whole generations of young women are brought up on television, mindless consumerism, and overall idiotic popular culture. A majority of women live very pampered lives protected, privileged, insulated, and separate away from all forms of brutal suffering which has made them entitled spoiled brats.

That's ok, a majority of these women will become desperate willing to do anything once the really dark times ahead come. Being that a majority are imbeciles it will mean that they will be easily trainable and those that refuse to will be forced nonetheless as they'll have no other options.
Last edited by Zero_Sum on Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:02 pm

promethean75 wrote:^^^ boooooring.

not much in this universe is more lame than 'romance' between ordinary law abiding citizens. i told you man, only nihilists are capable of genuine romantic love, which is less about the dry and clinical convention of reproduction and family and more about the art of the novatorean crusade against all rule and custom. a man and a woman cannot know 'love' until they hunt together, until they ride the lightening together. like this...




Yeah, I've searched for such women in the past. They don't exist man, it's just a fictional literary construct.

If they do exist they would be those extremely rare exceptions locked up in a prison somewhere.

A majority of women are timid, weak, and possess the intelligence equivalence of a sixteen year old girl throughout their entire adulthood.
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Thu Nov 14, 2019 1:01 am

Any great love or romance, comes from rare Men, not from women.

Love is a creation of Man, not of Woman.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2146
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby MagsJ » Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:28 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote:Any great love or romance, comes from rare Men, not from women.

Love is a creation of Man, not of Woman.

I think that ‘Love and romance most definitely exist, as long as neither party's involved most definitely don’t resist’.

That ^^^ was something I thought of earlier, but it seems to pertain to here, now.. are you insinuating a domino/trickle down effect, on what triggers love in the other? I agree, but who can be certain on the beginnings of the source, that is that love?
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18858
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:07 am

MagsJ wrote:I think that ‘Love and romance most definitely exist, as long as neither party's involved most definitely don’t resist’.

That ^^^ was something I thought of earlier, but it seems to pertain to here, now.. are you insinuating a domino/trickle down effect, on what triggers love in the other? I agree, but who can be certain on the beginnings of the source, that is that love?

Yeah, I'm talking about the trigger. Men act, Women react, then the display, the "real-thing" is a product of two halves.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2146
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:53 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote:Any great love or romance, comes from rare Men, not from women.

Love is a creation of Man, not of Woman.


Love is an emotion felt by men so much so that they'll kill others or themselves for it, women only respond to financial incentives by comparison. :wink:
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:08 am

MagsJ wrote:
Urwrongx1000 wrote:Any great love or romance, comes from rare Men, not from women.

Love is a creation of Man, not of Woman.

I think that ‘Love and romance most definitely exist, as long as neither party's involved most definitely don’t resist’.

That ^^^ was something I thought of earlier, but it seems to pertain to here, now.. are you insinuating a domino/trickle down effect, on what triggers love in the other? I agree, but who can be certain on the beginnings of the source, that is that love?


Yup, plenty of women lining up to fall in love with men working at low wage Mcjobs everyday, has nothing to do with money or economic success at all. Nothing at all....... 8) :lol:

It's all sunshine, lollipops, unicorns, cut up shaped hearts, roses, and rainbows as far as the eye can see. 8) :lol:
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:27 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
MagsJ wrote:I think that ‘Love and romance most definitely exist, as long as neither party's involved most definitely don’t resist’.

That ^^^ was something I thought of earlier, but it seems to pertain to here, now.. are you insinuating a domino/trickle down effect, on what triggers love in the other? I agree, but who can be certain on the beginnings of the source, that is that love?

Yeah, I'm talking about the trigger. Men act, Women react, then the display, the "real-thing" is a product of two halves.


Women only react to deep pockets and then they get on all fours naked like a dog waiting for you to slide that credit card down their vaginal lining. "Would you like a receipt for today's deposited financial transaction sir?" :lol:

"Let's not look at it as a financial transaction honey, let's call it love or romance instead because it sounds more childishly innocent and because it makes me sound like much less of a whore." " My love of myself that I give to you sweet cheeks I give to you freely without any strings or prices attached. *wink'wink* *fingers-crossed* "

:lol: 8)
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:23 am

It's interesting to note that sexual egalitarianism the hallmark of feminism was rooted in early Marxism at the turn of the nineteenth century, it was suppose to be a new era of sexual equality between men and women with women's rights or general sexual emancipation. The evil patriarchy is dead, long live sexual equality became the motto. So women for all their rights, privileges, and entitlements passed onto their gender where the sexual traditional role of woman had effectively become abolished over a period of time along with all its social responsibilities it once had in history.

You know who's traditional sexual imposed responsibilities or roles was never abolished? That of men.

Now just think about this for moment here, women are emancipated from all traditional sexual roles of responsibilities but when it concerns men we have to shoulder everything by ourselves, seems fair right?

If you look at some of the hardcore feminist socialists or even Marxists they would say that male patriarchy is the equivalence of the horrible social oppression of capitalism. Isn't that interesting? You see, sexual equality or the egalitarianism that was promised was never delivered where instead overtime it just became a female apparatus of social retribution against men we still see play out today. What's interesting about modern feminists of all political persuasions is that they still have that mindset of sexual capital, erotic capital, sexual market, or hypergamy where let's face it is a kinda of social sexual capitalism on the part of women. Even more audacious it stems from the same established patriarchal culture that they publicly resent, ridicule, or hate. So on the one hand you have feminists complaining about the evils of capitalism or male patriarchy and on the other hand judging men on a criteria of a sexual market in a very hypergamic manner that has always been very capitalistic and patriarchally rooted historically. It seems even the most radical and rigid of feminists deep down inside like the male patriarchy otherwise, why would they judge men sexually in terms of finding a sexual partner, mate, or somebody to reproduce with under the same exact judging system? This is what I like to call females wanting their cake and eating it too. It's of course blatant hypocrisy but of course goes unchallenged.

I always like pointing this out to even the most radical of feminists and of course I can never get a rational response or reply to this matter other than the very hatred of me bringing it up to begin with. :lol:

You see, the emancipation of women never ever had to do anything with sexual equality or even egalitarianism, those were just false fronts, the real aim of feminism was to emancipate themselves from the lower classes and lower economic ranks of men to expand upon female hypergamy that was always prevalent since the beginning of time. By emancipating themselves from the lower ranks of men, social responsibilities, and traditional sexual roles of being females they now have all the time in the world to pursue the minority top percentage of men to their hearts content fulfilling the hypergamic female strategy of sexual selection unregulated. That was the real motivation behind feminism and still is to this day.

Although overtime women are finding this new existence of free unregulated hypergamy to be lonely as the minority top percentage of men are very few in number and shrinking with every year as they sexually compete amongst themselves in reproductive access to them. There's a minority of those men within an endless sea [larger population] of women chasing after them within constant sexual competition against each other amongst other females.

The top wealthy men know this of course and then tell themselves there is no reason for them to get married or settle down because essentially a majority of women are offering themselves for free where they can have a different woman everyday of the week especially with threatening problems of divorce. If the wealthy men know they can get whatever woman they want, why just settle for one an entire lifetime? So they simply just don't.

So there stands our modern emancipated women free of sexual roles or responsibilities, free to indulge their unregulated hypergamy at will, free to reject the lower ranks of men, free to condemn male patriarchy while enjoying the hypergamic capitalistic sexual market fruits of it, and at the end of the day remains perfectly single, childless, unmarried, and having the Bukake face of their bachelor wealthy male peers like a semen drenched public urinal crown befitting of modern entitled princesses everywhere. Amongst all of that you have a global fertility crisis ever encroaching around the world and a large growing number of angry chronically single men. [But fuck those incel losers anyways as they're just a bunch of lower social caste men, right? It's not like anything bad happens when a large group of angry men get together and socially organized, am I right?]

This is modern feminism explained.
Last edited by Zero_Sum on Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:20 am, edited 4 times in total.
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby MagsJ » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:08 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
MagsJ wrote:I think that ‘Love and romance most definitely exist, as long as neither party's involved most definitely don’t resist’.

That ^^^ was something I thought of earlier, but it seems to pertain to here, now.. are you insinuating a domino/trickle down effect, on what triggers love in the other? I agree, but who can be certain on the beginnings of the source, that is that love?

Yeah, I'm talking about the trigger. Men act, Women react, then the display, the "real-thing" is a product of two halves.

Yeah.. two sexy halves, to make a sexy whole.

What do you mean, when you keep saying ‘the display’? a display of..?
Last edited by MagsJ on Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18858
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby promethean75 » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:55 am

waiting for you to slide that credit card down their vaginal lining.


This isn't a bad idea except it would involve some rather uncomfortable invasive surgery to work right. You'd have to install a chip and/or strip reader on the inner labia... and there would need to be a keypad for pin numbers.

Also, how would the card user know if the card was accepted or rejected? There would have to be an LED screen or at least some lights.
promethean75
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:21 pm

MagsJ wrote:Yeah.. two sexy halves, to make a sexy whole.

What do you mean, when you keep saying ‘the display’? a display of..?

I mean that authentic love/respect/affection between a man and woman, of noble and rare quality, is not widely displayed, and most people simply pretend they have something they don't. But that doesn't stop people for looking for it, and for inspiration, from those who can achieve it.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2146
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby MagsJ » Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:33 pm

Zero_Sum wrote:
MagsJ wrote:
Urwrongx1000 wrote:Any great love or romance, comes from rare Men, not from women.

Love is a creation of Man, not of Woman.

I think that ‘Love and romance most definitely exist, as long as neither party's involved most definitely don’t resist’.

That ^^^ was something I thought of earlier, but it seems to pertain to here, now.. are you insinuating a domino/trickle down effect, on what triggers love in the other? I agree, but who can be certain on the beginnings of the source, that is that love?

Yup, plenty of women lining up to fall in love with men working at low wage Mcjobs everyday, has nothing to do with money or economic success at all. Nothing at all....... 8) :lol:

It's all sunshine, lollipops, unicorns, cut up shaped hearts, roses, and rainbows as far as the eye can see. 8) :lol:

I see your view on women hasn’t changed, in comparison to your other world views, which seem to have, as you have mentioned it here.

Most couples I know, both contribute to funding their lifestyle and lives in general, and usually meet through mutual friends or through/at work, which obviously greatly diminishes the chance of a non-genuine money-oriented union.

I guess Professionals do tend to stick together.. socialise together.. procreate together.. do everything together, but there are always exceptions to every rule, so they don’t always do these things within their career type/tier.

I never have, and wouldn’t want, to rely on a man to fund my lifestyle and life.. though many have offered to, in offering to hole me up in an apartment that they have bought for me and in which only they can visit lol, and that is the dullest/deadest existence I can think of or contemplate ever having. I rarely get asked to be a wife, but mostly a mistress, so it is not only women that seek the superficial and money-oriented relationship option.
Last edited by MagsJ on Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18858
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby MagsJ » Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:50 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
MagsJ wrote:Yeah.. two sexy halves, to make a sexy whole.

What do you mean, when you keep saying ‘the display’? a display of..?

I mean that authentic love/respect/affection between a man and woman, of noble and rare quality, is not widely displayed, and most people simply pretend they have something they don't.

Perhaps because such displays of such feelings, can, will, and does, stir a reaction in others.. for all manner of reasons, but not always good ones with good intentions or wishes for those that have stirred them so, ergo Private Lives.

Sometimes.. when out n about, I see couples giving a cheeky smile or look of contentment, so perhaps they feel in a safe space to be able to do so.. it ain’t easy being a snowflake in a society of salt and grit, who are just waiting for you to dissipate under their surface. So maybe it’s not a matter of ‘most people simply pretending they have something they don't’, but a matter of protecting what they do have?

But that doesn't stop people for looking for it, and for inspiration, from those who can achieve it.

..and so it shouldn’t.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18858
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:42 pm

promethean75 wrote:
waiting for you to slide that credit card down their vaginal lining.


This isn't a bad idea except it would involve some rather uncomfortable invasive surgery to work right. You'd have to install a chip and/or strip reader on the inner labia... and there would need to be a keypad for pin numbers.

Also, how would the card user know if the card was accepted or rejected? There would have to be an LED screen or at least some lights.



It's more of a De-Sade-esque vulgar symbolic imagery of mine employed to show how really a majority of women care so little about men other than disposable economic utility and along with illustrating the basic reptilian primitive mind of human females that will do anything to procreate with men of power, status, or wealth.

Although what you mention is pretty funny also. 8)
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:19 pm

MagsJ wrote:I see your view on women hasn’t changed, in comparison to your other world views, which seem to have, as you have mentioned it here.

Most couples I know, both contribute to funding their lifestyle and lives in general, and usually meet through mutual friends or through/at work, which obviously greatly diminishes the chance of a non-genuine money-oriented union.

I guess Professionals do tend to stick together.. socialise together.. procreate together.. do everything together, but there are always exceptions to every rule, so they don’t always do these things within their career type/tier.

I never have, and wouldn’t want, to rely on a man to fund my lifestyle and life.. though many have offered to, in offering to hole me up in an apartment that they have bought for me and in which only they can visit lol, and that is the dullest/deadest existence I can think of or contemplate ever having. I rarely get asked to be a wife, but mostly a mistress, so it is not only women that seek the superficial and money-oriented relationship option.


No, my overall disdain, cynicism, criticism, and border-lining of outright hatred of women's sexual behavior proclivities haven't changed much at all. I've been very consistent with that all these years.

My cynical philosophical theories on women are expanding and evolving where I feel I'm very close to unlocking the female psyche underneath that false facade of pretenses that they show towards the rest of the world. I'm getting better at articulating this hatred, contempt, or disdain of mine.

Women don't want a non-money oriented social union with men, that's my point. Women are purely venture sexual capitalists masquerading as romantic idealists. Sexual interaction is merely an economic business model of women.

Sexual interaction on the part of women is nothing more than a social capital enterprise.

The exceptions are so minor or rare they're pointless in discussing in contrast to the majority of cases and overall prevailing social norms.

I bet you like a majority of women reject lower caste men as below your societal stationary position in life. There are literally hordes of lower caste men out there that want a singular woman or a social and sexual companion but because they're deemed societal inferiors women instead just ignore the shit out them treating them horribly. "I'm so above that than to demean myself being with men like them."

So women ride the cock carousel with a variety of upper class wealthy men hoping one day they can nail the right one to stick with them the rest of their lives except that those same upper class wealthy men have no desire of settling down which is why my dear you've been reduced to a permanent sexual mistress for life until there comes a day that men will no longer even desire that from you. These sexual mistresses age and get older where their uterus shrivels up drying out where afterwards in their older years remain alone single for the rest of their lives.
"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby Zero_Sum » Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:56 pm

De-Sade-esque. 8)

"I'm sorry, but the lifestyle you've ordered that you've grown accustomed to is completely out of stock. Have a nice day! "-$$$
User avatar
Zero_Sum
Evil Neo-Nazi Extraordinaire.
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: U.S.S.A- Newly lead Bolshevik Soviet block. Also known as Weimar America.

Re: There is no such thing as love or romance.

Postby MagsJ » Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:39 pm

Zero_Sum wrote:So women ride the cock carousel with a variety of upper class wealthy men hoping one day they can nail the right one to stick with them the rest of their lives except that those same upper class wealthy men have no desire of settling down which is why my dear you've been reduced to a permanent sexual mistress for life until there comes a day that men will no longer even desire that from you. These sexual mistresses age and get older where their uterus shrivels up drying out where afterwards in their older years remain alone single for the rest of their lives.

I never said I slept with any of these men.. they never got that far.. it never got beyond the asking, then begging, then they eventually go away, onto the next one.. as the sing goes.

I don’t partake in expected normal, or other, social behaviours and interactions, but I guess that wasn’t clear in my post?

Lol at that video..
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18858
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

PreviousNext

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users