Karpel Tunnel wrote:Zero_Sum wrote:I have an entirely different view regarding sexual relationships in that I firmly reject traditional fictions of love and romance altogether. Basically for me women are sexual capitalists or mercenaries where to understand female sexual nature all one has to understand is female hypergamy. Hypergamy is where all women compete amongst themselves for the top thirty percentile of men who are the most powerful, wealthiest, or influential because women are attracted to wealth, social economic mobility, and social power.
I have always managed to attract women, and very attractive women. I have never been even close to the top 30% of incomes. Women do want financial stability, most of them. But there tends to be a minimum. Like once the man can hold decent jobs, they enter the pool of people to fall in love with. And those decent jobs do not have to put them above 70% of other men. Sure, there are women who go for money, but as a rule. Nah.
And men have the parallel version, where looks are higher on the list. But once they find themselves attracted to the person, that minimum is crossed and from their anyone in what is a rather large pool for most men is a possibility.
Most people are pretty shallow, but even shallow people weigh in things like sense of humor, shared interests, that they enjoy the company of the other person, that they can be friends. People with just a bit more soul to them include things like intelligence.
And it's not just that I haven't been in the top 30%. I haven't shown any career interest. If I can work less and get by, I do. I have issues with authority (as they say, heh) also. I tend to jump to other fields. I'll get jobs that are pleasant with massive cuts in pay. But I pull my weight.
And that puts me over the minimum. I have other attributes that make me attractive to women, so in the pool of men who are ok finanacially, who will pull their weight, women get interested in me.
It is so fucking facile to hate all women rather than noticing what makes your life and experiences, choices and attitudes, factors in what you have experienced.
It's like reading an incel whose on prozac and the prozac is working so you are happy to hate women.
I have always managed to attract women, and very attractive women. I have never been even close to the top 30% of incomes.
What's your profession and yearly income amount to?

Give me an estimated range of financial self worth.
Sure, there are women who go for money, but as a rule. Nah.
Oh, really? What alien planet do you stem from?

And men have the parallel version, where looks are higher on the list. But once they find themselves attracted to the person, that minimum is crossed and from their anyone in what is a rather large pool for most men is a possibility
Except physical looks is the easiest thing for people to change upon whereas economic occupation and money isn't.
Basically women utilize the worst things or criterias to judge men on by comparison.
Most people are pretty shallow, but even shallow people weigh in things like sense of humor, shared interests, that they enjoy the company of the other person, that they can be friends. People with just a bit more soul to them include things like intelligence.
With women financial economic value of a man is their primary value of judgement, everything else is secondary to that.
You could be the most repulsive, boring, un-entertaining, and humorless man in the world but if you're worth millions of dollars women will chase after you.
It is so fucking facile to hate all women rather than noticing what makes your life and experiences, choices and attitudes, factors in what you have experienced.
I don't hate all women, just a majority of them.

It's like reading an incel whose on prozac and the prozac is working so you are happy to hate women.
An incel is a man that hasn't been with a woman, I on the other hand have been with many women over a period of time. The label doesn't fit.
I do find it interesting you would utilize that incendiary language here however.
