Mowk,
Mind fucks consist of the ability to separate the fuck of the mind from that of the body.
Is it determinative that we are socially fucked, as a whole, or does our strength consist of striking back against the leveling power that our will can resist?
Can we establish a perceived boundary whereby we can identify the forces which try to reduce such awareness?
For boundaries are established for that purpose as well, and when internal enemies appear to overwhelm this capacity, the exportation of that power becomes necessary to prevent internal collapse.
Internal collapse is the appearance of a state of awareness, where conflicting (values) - parties, are perceived as interpenetrable, and mixed beyond recognition. The identifiable characteristics of such change, dilute and appear to change the abstracted conceivable product, whereas, structural differentiation remains intact on primary levels.
How this is done is no mistery, changes in value are left unperturbed, by the processes of unavailability, of primary constructions of power.
It means very little to model secondarily processed simulated reductions of appearent value, since with increasing capital accumulations, the surgically changed appearent diminished value, at par with increased social numerical expansion, identifiable characteristic types appear to dissolve at par with rates of dissolution.
Note: appearent material dissolution can overcome a nominal sense of resolution, as at par with the laws governing de-construction.
That is at the source of contention between material and immaterial dialectic. It is not apparently reducible, and ends in contradiction. Primary types of being are not reducible existentially, without a perciable contradiction to nothingness.
Communism, literally is unsupportable in terms of Rousseau’s description of social contract, and when certain intolerable limits are reached, the dynamic tends to curve under it’s own weight, and singularly, appearent alienation takes it’s course within the supposed pseudo Kantian synthetic logic.
This hypothesis begs further analysis, as historically, at least, signaling a possible emergence of such a model.
Rosa Luchtensein’s failure, consisted in the in recognition of this lack of transparency into the failure of the primacy of unsustained eidectic reduction, even if, she had innately realized it’s relation to the phenomenologically reduced Being into Nothingness.
Sartre’s failure is consistent with his abandonment of Communism post Nov.1956-1957.
Note: please do not look at the above as an unsupportable exposition or even diatribe, to support the idea of alienation, (to self victimize or anything else) , ((Reismann, The Vanishing Adolescence)), or even attempts to undermine my’ appearance as ‘being around the block’ , etc.,but only an attempt to explore new ground, within and without the current administration’s position , as it seems almost fallacious.
It’s s just that, from the moment I came to ILP, I expressed my desire to write in likeliness , of expectation of mirroring Dostoevsky’s “Letters from Underground” ( and again in semi likened), as iambig points out rightly that my objection to nihilism as criticism , while partially being submerged in appearance serves somewhat an excercise in irony.