Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Karpel Tunnel » Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:46 pm

Thanathots wrote:I'm not talking about love, imbecile. I was responding to you and talking about nobility - the low standards I set with my post.
Sure, I got that you were talking about nobility. And when doing that you talked about what women were like. And then you made it clear that even then you were not judging women, in general, harshly enough. One can deduce things from those statements. You must know, given what you think about women in general, that certain things are not possible.
Karpel Tunnel
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby barbarianhorde » Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:01 pm

Plus our form of love was actually invented as a nobility, by the folks from Languedoc.
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.
~ Владимир Ильич Ульянов Ленин

THE HORNED ONE
User avatar
barbarianhorde
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:26 pm
Location: in the cupboard by your kn knees

Lavinia Azular Northa

Postby barbarianhorde » Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:06 pm

I think Donald Trumps daughter is noble in the extreme. She lives for her Fathers House and is the jewel in it. And her fathers house is now America and thus the West. I agree not many women are anywhere near that class.
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.
~ Владимир Ильич Ульянов Ленин

THE HORNED ONE
User avatar
barbarianhorde
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:26 pm
Location: in the cupboard by your kn knees

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby lordoflight » Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:34 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:You're either a weak person, or you're not.

Weak people are constantly victims. They don't have self-responsibility or accountability. However, obviously there is a wide range of Victimhood. So a 12 year old girl being raped is not comparable to a 22 year old young woman being raped. Nuance is lost on Modern people though, who are irrational, emotional, and sensationalistic.

Modern Feminists claim that "Women are strong, hear us roar!" on one hand, but on the other, "We are poor, blameless victims of the Evil White Male Patriarchy!" This is a contradiction. You can't have it both ways. So Modern women either need to admit that they're weak, pathetic, ignoble people, OR, they're strong, noble, and self-responsible.


And this is the current state for Modern USA and other western nations. Ignoble women everywhere.

It is YOUR fault, women.


Yes I noticed this as well. I would see ads and commercials saying "We are Strong". And women fighting punching bags, talking about how strong women are. Yet the music in the background, was always feminist sounding piano music. And there was a cognitive disconnect. Strength is supposed to be shown not told. Strong people don't have to convince you they are strong. They don't care about whether you believe they are strong. They just drive past you with their loud rock and roll music. And I heard no rock and roll in any of these commercials.
User avatar
lordoflight
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:41 pm

Good points,

Strength is about Pride. If a father cannot be proud of his daughters then women have no Pride, and thus no Power. Most western women are prideless. Their fathers are ashamed of them. Ivanka Trump is a great example of daughters worth being Proud about. Beautiful, classy, intelligent, and won't bend to cowardly and lesser men. Can you imagine Ivanka Trump as "helpless victim"? Nope, me neither.

The "Feminist" movement is anti-woman and anti-strength. Feminism is pro-weakness. Feminism wants women to be victims, and prideless. Because Feminists want to remove Pride, remove Patriarchy, the source of strength of powerful women.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Pandora » Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:18 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote: Ivanka Trump is a great example of daughters worth being Proud about. Beautiful, classy, intelligent, and won't bend to cowardly and lesser men. Can you imagine Ivanka Trump as "helpless victim"? Nope, me neither.
I can appreciate the value of family loyalty, but when it comes to public office, advancing family members regardless of experience boils down to nepotism (favoritism). Which is a form of corruption.

Even the Ottomans practiced a more open form of meritocracy. Many ex-slaves, on the account of their own personal merit, rose to positions of status, such as great generals/admirals, and even Grand Viziers:
http://www.corndancer.com/fritze/reform ... _home.html

(of course there was some hostility between the local hereditary nobility and the ambitious but promising commoners, but the road to power was equally open to both - and it was based on merit. ....Would Ottomans have been as successful if their ruling was strictly dynastic?)
User avatar
Pandora
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Ward 6

Re: Lavinia Azular Northa

Postby Karpel Tunnel » Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:36 am

barbarianhorde wrote:I think Donald Trumps daughter is noble in the extreme. She lives for her Fathers House and is the jewel in it. And her fathers house is now America and thus the West. I agree not many women are anywhere near that class.
She may be noble, but his comments about her body and what he would do if she wasn't his daughter are less so.
Karpel Tunnel
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:34 am

Pandora wrote:Which is a form of corruption.

On the contrary, disloyalty against family and favoring strangers over your own kin, is corrupt.

USA is moving from Democrazy to Royalist (kin-first).
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Thanathots » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:45 am

barbarianhorde wrote::)

Yes, great strategy too. To lower the object of their desire in value so they feel they deserve it, in the meantime agreeing with lowering themselves in value by desiring what they define as a piece of trash. So smart.
Other guys take anther approach. They'll admire a woman and still act like they deserve her, so the woman concludes that they think very highly of themselves.


No faggot horde, I stated a few plain truths about female nature, "piece of trash" is your judgment of these truths because you're used to lying to yourself and imagining women have some qualities they don't actually have so you can justify putting them on a pedestal and admiring them. You despise what women actually are so much you have to replace it with a fantasy.
User avatar
Thanathots
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Thanathots » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 am

Karpel Tunnel wrote:There seem to be a number of people of both sexes who take such a dim view of the opposite sex life must be hell.


Same as I said to faggot horde, it only seems "dim" to you because you've grown accustomed to comfortable lies. And yeah there is no love, what a tragedy, right? Did you know unicorns don't exist too.

Ah, but a reality in which unicorns don't exist must be so "dim". Since I called it dim it automatically makes it not true, meaning I can go back to my comfortable faggot delusions.
User avatar
Thanathots
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Thanathots » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:49 am

Oh yeah Ivanka Trump is very noble. Nothing more noble than a feminist whored out by her father to an effeminate Jew for marriage.
User avatar
Thanathots
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:13 am

Thanathots wrote:Nothing more noble than a feminist whored out by her father to an effeminate Jew for marriage.

Name 3 noble American women.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

We the People

Postby Pandora » Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:56 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Pandora wrote:Which is a form of corruption.

On the contrary, disloyalty against family and favoring strangers over your own kin, is corrupt.

USA is moving from Democrazy to Royalist (kin-first).

Should a public servant put the interests of his own family over the interests of the public he is supposed to serve? As far as I know, the public elected Trump, not "his friends and family".

(The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves)

https://i.imgur.com/kCyoeCP.jpg

https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes ... -35-63.jpg
User avatar
Pandora
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Ward 6

Re: We the People

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:06 am

Pandora wrote:Should a public servant put the interests of his own family over the interests of the public he is supposed to serve?

America already voted though. This is what America wants.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Pandora » Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:15 am

User avatar
Pandora
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Ward 6

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby lordoflight » Wed Oct 17, 2018 2:35 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Pandora wrote:Which is a form of corruption.

On the contrary, disloyalty against family and favoring strangers over your own kin, is corrupt.

USA is moving from Democrazy to Royalist (kin-first).


And that is exactly the problem with Royalist-ism. Putting someone else's family first. Its like the cuckery of tabloids, always talking about the marriage of the Prince Charles or whoever he is. Letting us being ruled by rothschilds and Queens of England banning our guns. As bad as democracy is, monarchy is worse. It's valuing someone elses family over your own.
User avatar
lordoflight
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:35 pm

lordoflight wrote:And that is exactly the problem with Royalist-ism. Putting someone else's family first. Its like the cuckery of tabloids, always talking about the marriage of the Prince Charles or whoever he is. Letting us being ruled by rothschilds and Queens of England banning our guns. As bad as democracy is, monarchy is worse. It's valuing someone elses family over your own.

Communists, Marxists, Lunatic-Liberal-Leftists, Feminists, have all worked together to destroy the American family unit, and debase the "white-male-patriarchy" for the last 50 years.

It should be no surprise, given the high amount of Divorce, single-mother families, resentiment, internal fighting, broken families, rate of Bastards, absentee parents, surrogate parents, that the majority of America now (spawning from broken-families) look to nobler examples rather than favor their own kin.


Because the American family unit is shattered, people lust for the Ideal of a family. Anybody/Anything that represents this Ideal (Trump's family) will satisfy the hunger. The problem here, is immorality, including this #metoo movement, false accusations against Modern males, etc.


Women are to blame.

The "victims" are only pretending to be victims. They are actually the Perpetrators, the ones responsible.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:37 pm

When was the last US President, before Trump, to have sons?

Obama = daughters

Bush = daughters

Clinton = daughter


It was George Bush Sr. who had sons. So George Bush Sr. was the last 'masculine' US president. People wanted and voted for Trump (a vote for Masculinity).


Pandora is wrong, like usual.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby lordoflight » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:40 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
lordoflight wrote:And that is exactly the problem with Royalist-ism. Putting someone else's family first. Its like the cuckery of tabloids, always talking about the marriage of the Prince Charles or whoever he is. Letting us being ruled by rothschilds and Queens of England banning our guns. As bad as democracy is, monarchy is worse. It's valuing someone elses family over your own.

Communists, Marxists, Lunatic-Liberal-Leftists, Feminists, have all worked together to destroy the American family unit, and debase the "white-male-patriarchy" for the last 50 years.

It should be no surprise, given the high amount of Divorce, single-mother families, resentiment, internal fighting, broken families, rate of Bastards, absentee parents, surrogate parents, that the majority of America now (spawning from broken-families) look to nobler examples rather than favor their own kin.


Because the American family unit is shattered, people lust for the Ideal of a family. Anybody/Anything that represents this Ideal (Trump's family) will satisfy the hunger. The problem here, is immorality, including this #metoo movement, false accusations against Modern males, etc.


Women are to blame.

The "victims" are only pretending to be victims. They are actually the Perpetrators, the ones responsible.


Cannot really disagree with most of that.

Urwrongx1000 wrote:When was the last US President, before Trump, to have sons?

Obama = daughters

Bush = daughters

Clinton = daughter


It was George Bush Sr. who had sons. So George Bush Sr. was the last 'masculine' US president. People wanted and voted for Trump (a vote for Masculinity).


Pandora is wrong, like usual.


Not sure if testosterone causes sons, and Bill Clinton is a masculine man.
User avatar
lordoflight
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:46 pm

lordoflight wrote:Not sure if testosterone causes sons, and Bill Clinton is a masculine man.

I think it deeply affects the sperm count of 'Y' chromosomes. More testosterone = more 'Y' sperms in each ejaculation, so much higher chance for sons than daughters.

Modern males (feminine) ejaculate mostly 'X' chromosome sperms and so most likely will have daughters.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby lordoflight » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:56 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
lordoflight wrote:Not sure if testosterone causes sons, and Bill Clinton is a masculine man.

I think it deeply affects the sperm count of 'Y' chromosomes. More testosterone = more 'Y' sperms in each ejaculation, so much higher chance for sons than daughters.

Modern males (feminine) ejaculate mostly 'X' chromosome sperms and so most likely will have daughters.


I think it may be some kind of subconscious awareness their life will suck as a man, if they are born as an adult in a society 20 years in the future, so they push out X chromosomes so they reincarnate as female. Lol.
User avatar
lordoflight
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby barbarianhorde » Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:57 pm

Pandora wrote:https://pics.me.me/the-trump-family-normalizing-tyranny-nepotism-and-treason-since-2017-24987858.png


The girl who blindly believes what her owners tell her.
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.
~ Владимир Ильич Ульянов Ленин

THE HORNED ONE
User avatar
barbarianhorde
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:26 pm
Location: in the cupboard by your kn knees

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby barbarianhorde » Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:03 pm

Clinton a masculine man?
Have you seen his wife?

Only a total slave would be able to stand one afternoon with that.... thing.
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.
~ Владимир Ильич Ульянов Ленин

THE HORNED ONE
User avatar
barbarianhorde
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:26 pm
Location: in the cupboard by your kn knees

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:09 pm

lordoflight wrote:I think it may be some kind of subconscious awareness their life will suck as a man, if they are born as an adult in a society 20 years in the future, so they push out X chromosomes so they reincarnate as female. Lol.

Great observation, I didn't consider that before.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Postby lordoflight » Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:14 pm

barbarianhorde wrote:Clinton a masculine man?
Have you seen his wife?

Only a total slave would be able to stand one afternoon with that.... thing.


I'd have sex with her. Wouldn't be my first choice, and I might be evil for having sex with someone so evil. Physically speaking shes a bit old but not too hard on the eyes. Anyway its a mute point, its obvious she didnt satisfy his needs as he was constantly finding himself cheating on her anyways.
User avatar
lordoflight
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:38 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron