…or Native Canadians for that matter.
Well that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but bear with me for a sec.
While it varies, DNA tests (and the naked eye if it’s sufficiently discerning) indicate most so called ‘African and Native Americans’ are much closer to being 50% African and Native American than they are to being 100% African and Native American.
And most of the rest of their DNA is European.
So objectively, it makes as much sense to call these population groups European as it does African or Native.
In reality, they’re hybrids or mongrels, not what they, or others claim they are.
And so they’re the ancestors of slaves, and slave masters, of natives, and colonialists/settlers.
Progressives imply most or many whites, especially white cops fear and hate Africans and Natives.
If progressives really care about discrimination, why do they insist on emphasizing their otherness?
Why not instead emphasize their Europeaness, or their humanness, or their racial ambiguity?
The answer: because progressives can’t exist without an oppressed, victim class, real or imagined, they feed on the sympathy, and funds they can garner like vultures.
If none or too few exist, they’ll invent some and/or exaggerate the existence of others.
emphasizing their otherness only reinforces our belief, they’re an other, making discrimination more possible.
These’re not Africans and Natives, they’re people of mixed decent, heritage, and so they should think of themselves, and be thought of as such, and so they should check the mixed race or other box during census.