@Karpel
Fauxsexuals are not and cannot become members of the opposite sex.
At best, they are or can become androgynous.
either way, they are pretending to be something, they are not.
-
The essential, most contrastive or starkest, Macroscopic difference between men and women is what sex organs they’re born with.
It’s what defines them, distinguishes them, sets them apart.
There are many other differences between them, but again, none so primary as their sex organs, all other differences are secondary.
And so called ‘sex reassignment surgery’ doesn’t give fauxsexuals the genitals of the opposite sex, at best, they restructure their genitals so they kind of, sort of appear and function like genitals of the opposite sex in some ways, but not really, and at worst, they just flat out disfigure, mutilate and butcher their genitals. -
The essential, most contrastive or starkest, Microscopic difference between men and women is what chromosomes they’re born with, and fauxwomen aren’t born with, don’t naturally develop and can’t be artificially given XX chromosomes, likewise fauxmen aren’t born with, don’t naturally develop and can’t be artificially given XY chromosomes.
-
While some fauxsexuals may be born with or naturally develop a few physical secondary sex characteristics of the opposite sex, such as a man having broad hips, narrow shoulders and a shallow voice, or a woman having narrow hips, broad shoulders and a deep voice, obviously all fauxsexuals share the vast majority of their physical secondary sex characteristics with the same sex (and I suspect the same is true of their brains, but we shall see later).
And no amount of testosterone and estrogen blockers and injections can significantly alter that, especially if they begin taking them as adults, but even if they begin taking them as children, already major divergences between boys and girls have taken place, hell before they exit the womb, already major divergences between boys and girls have taken place.
And there’s so much more that goes into shaping men and women’s physical secondary sex characteristics than just testosterone and estrogen, there are other hormones, XY and XX chromosomes, and innumerable organic processes already underway from the time of conception onward that’re virtually impossible to reverse. -
Fauxsexuals brains at best tend to be sexually ambiguous, and arguably no fauxsexual is going to have a brain (nearly) identical to that of the opposite sex.
So the science on fauxsexual neurology is still early, and the data so far indicates their brains tend to be androgynous, rather than perfectly unaligned, or aligned with their physical sex.
But if you listened to the rhetoric coming from the progressive media, you’d think we know for a fact all fauxsexuals brains are 100% aligned with the opposite sex.
And I also wonder who funded these studies, and whether that skewed them and their results?
If a group of conservatives funded them, they’d be immediately called into question by the media, but if a group of progressives fund them?
Nope, no bias there.
Of course progressives are incapable of having an agenda, they are one of the two dominant political groups who always, always follows wherever the science leads, and conservatives never, ever do.
The former ideology is wholly motivated by science, whereas the latter is wholly motivated by religion, superstition and/or icky emotions, like hate and fear.
Because language, politics, psychology, sociology, or peoples opinions of themselves can be straightforward, like that, perfectly objective, like physics (well, even physics isn’t perfectly objective, but you get it), without any bias ever coming into play.
- Physiology continually shapes and determines neurology, and neurology continually shapes and determines, at least in part, psychology, including what masculine and feminine psychological traits you end up having, so you can’t have a wholly feminine brain in a wholly masculine body, and you can’t get a wholly feminine psychology out of a partly masculine brain.
For instance if you managed to successfully transplant a woman’s brain into a man’s body, it would no longer behave exactly like a woman’s brain, because body and brain are constantly molding, and remolding each other.
*Laughs, an aside, as organ transplantation advances, perhaps fauxsexual men and women will swap brains/bodies one day in the future.
- While studies might, or mightn’t suggest most fauxsexuals brains share some of their characteristics with the opposite sex, there’s obviously variability between them progressives, psychologists, governments and fauxsexuals themselves aren’t taking into account.
Some fauxsexuals brains and/or psychologies might/may resemble the brains of the opposite sex a little, some quite a bit, and some not at all, but are governments taking any of this variability into account?
Not at all.
As far as I know, and correct me if I’m wrong, It’s enough for you to simply say you feel like the opposite sex, in order to legally change your sex status.
I’m not taking that seriously.
At the very least, there should be checks and balances (neuropsychological screening) in place to determine the legitimacy of a claim like that, where you can now use a different bathroom, play different sports and so on.
So what it comes down to at the end of the day is feelings, I feel like an x is all you need.
This isn’t science working together with government and progressives on this, not even close, this is progressives hijacking government under the pretext of science.
Look government may be taking you seriously, but I’m not, just because you say internally you feel like an x, doesn’t mean you are or even close, anymore than me saying I’m blonde with an extroverted, sanguine personality, or a 6 year old African American, or a unicorn makes me any of these things.
You are entitled to perceive yourself however you like, but you are not entitled to my perception of you.
Just because you say you have a male or female brain/psychology, doesn’t mean you do, people can be mistaken about themselves, people can lie about themselves, and sometimes people know us or aspects of us better than we do ourselves.
-
All these facts, the fact that fauxsexuals don’t have the opposite sex’s genitals, the fact that they don’t have the opposite sex’s chromosomes, that by and large they don’t have their other physical attributes, and that by and large they don’t have their brains/minds, aren’t trivial, they are critical, not only for determining what bathrooms and sports you should be barred from, but from how you physically and psychologically interact with other people. You are not going to interact with the world the same way as the opposite sex does, not even close, and so you shouldn’t expect it, including the people within it, to perceive and interact with you the way you, irrespective of the facts, imagine or wish they should.
-
Slippery slope: what next? Are adults going to start claiming they’re children or vice versa (well they already are), are whites going to start claiming they’re blacks and vice versa, people other species?
And suppose we find a little scientific evidence to support some of these claims, that they kind of, sort of resemble the opposite or other in some way?
A little more than most people…on some level, then what?
everyone can claim to be anything they want?
Adults can go back to elementary school and play with children, children join the workforce and engage in other adult activities?
We can keep some people as pets and lock others up in zoos?
A white person can claim to be African or Native American and receive affirmative action or join the reservation?
Do I already happen to have more genes, and/or anatomical, morphological features (or at least ones people and/or scientists are paying attention to) in common with African Americans than typical for whites?
What combination of testosterone, estrogen or other hormones will make me more African?
When can I sign up for my Afro-facial reconstructive surgery?
How many soul, jazz and funk records do I have to listen to?
In conclusion, fauxsexuals aren’t the opposite sex, not even close, certainly not when it comes to primary sex characteristics (genitals and chromosomes), definitely not when it comes to physical secondary sexual characteristics (rest of the body and the brain), and more arguably not even when it comes to psychology, nor can they ever be, therefore, they shouldn’t be referred to as such, we should refer to them as faux or pseudosexuals, as feigning to be something other than they are, and can fully comprehend.