The problem with Society.

The problem with Society, is a clear Lack of morality. Ego causes lack of Morality. Ego is a masculine frame of mind, it is provably masculine because of symptoms, such as ego Preventing you for asking for help, or preventing you from wanting to say sorry, or preventing you from wanting to change your ways. To find a definition we can consider the opposite of what it is, crying and begging for forgiveness, Humility, is the opposite of Ego.

Now, your ego may make you want to post a disagreement to me, perhaps you want to accuse me of being a Feminist. But I will explain why, I am actually the opposite of a Feminist.

You see, Feminism is mostly just, ego. I explained that Ego is male. If you are male, and a male comes on to you, sexually, what do you feel? Disgust. Hatred. Rage. Do you feel compassion for that other male? Do you recognize the Causality of the male’s situation, that his male genitals, have natural sexual desires? Only if you are really enlightened, or free of ego. You see, Feminists are high in ego, they do not understand the natural Causality, that males are Sexually aroused by women.

Thus, you don’t have to view Ego as your friend, nor do you have to view non-Ego as the enemy of your world.

It is the lack of Morality, which causes all the problems. We can see a lack of Morality in modern music. And modern music has no spirituality to it, it is just noise which does not lift the soul. In the 1950’s, you could leave your car door unlocked and have noone steal it. But with modern music, they teach you to steal and to rob. Women are praised for breaking mens hearts and praised for treating men like objects. Men are praised for treating women like objects. And do you think any of this, is healthy or good for society in the long run. When everyone is miserable, what do you think people will want to build? What inspiration for greatness? The inspiration for greatness comes from goodness, compassion, and higher morality than the savage beast. Savage beasts are not known for their inventions. You can choose a world of savagery or civilization.

And civilization, doesn’t mean enslavement. For example, on the gun ban issue, simply adding morality can solve the situation. The moral solution, is to make sure students are happy with their lives, and don’t feel suffocated at school. The moral solution is to not punish students for standing up to bullies. And the other moral solution is, instead of shooting randoms, just stand up and fight the bullies. This is the perfect moral solution. But society is blinded by delusion, Morality has long went out the way side. Because it is immoral to ban guns from citizens, while giving guns to only the military, this is enabling of tyranny, which is immoral.

Morality does exist, it is not a fiction. It is only a fiction to those consumed with ego so long they have no feminine side, that they cannot feel guilt or aversion to evil. The feminine side is the key to saving society. We should go back to the 1950’s where there was no cussing on TV or hateful music, all the music was relaxing and pleasant, no hostile people on talk shows judging and being negative. The time where you were not afraid to talk to your neighbor, and you could leave your car keys without being afraid someone would steal it. The lack of morality builds on itself. You are always afraid, that someone will break into your home. So you buy a gun. But then you are always afraid, the government and the immoral population will ban your gun. Or worse, stick you with prison time or high fees. So you are always living in fear, afraid, and the fear is destroying civilization. For example, there is a company called Invent Help. But the internet says it is a scam. I try to be a moral person, and say, maybe they are not a scam. But if it is a scam, that is an example of how immoral, scam businesses, and the immoral law makers who shelter these businesses, destroy civilization. People are not able to invent things for society. They read stories of how the guy who invented the synthetic diamond, had his fortune stolen from him by a greedy corporation. And immoral stories like these just remove the inspiration of greatness from society, increasing the collective fear, lethargy, and hopelessness.

Is there no positive side to having an ego? Is there no healthy way of expressing one’s ego?

Please explain this more.

Human beings are naturally amoral, selfish, hedonistic, egotistical, and self serving. Only a centralized strong influencing state can force human beings to be moral, ethical, lawful, and cooperative.

…the problem with society is their over-zealous use of competing, but without a single prize or goal in sight… now what a waste of energy that is.

You think that having sense of self causes all lack of morality?

There are three frames of mind, the id, ego, and superego. The superego is a reflective and feminine state of mind, an evolution of the ego and center of clear reflection and compassion. Represented as colors, id would be red and superego would be blue, thus ego is purple as it is the kings ego which gives him his imaginary power over others. Even though most kings, save for Solomon, have no better wisdom than the average commoner. And yes most of America’s politicians are STEM illiterate and demonstrate regular incompetence managing city things such as infrastructure, transportation, rules and laws.

The good old days of the 1950’s were only for white men. Ask a black guy, woman or gay person if people were more moral back then.

Robbery is more prevalent because advertising is more prevalent. Society is more unruly because both parents work longer hours and because people quite rightly don’t believe/trust in authority any more, coupled with the fact it is reported and more visible by 24h news channels.

Ah yes, blame all the problems on whitey…

What did I blame on whitey? I was just stating how things were in the 1950s. If anything whitey as pushed through lots of reforms for progress.

White people were such a problem in the 1950’s? :laughing:

Not sure if I get your point? Are you saying minorities, gays and women were better off then compared to now?

Ah, a neo liberal that complains about muh-white oppression. You will get along with our other neo liberal here Peter Kropotkin, he hates whiteness also.

Like I tried to say and I will once more. There is no white oppression, some whites guys are good others bad, same for women, gays whoever. I am saying the white guys are the ones who made the social reforms when they realised their error. They’re also the good guys, the 1950s were better than the 1850s, again white people making progress. If I was gay in Uganda, I would be in jail. Black oppression, is that a problem for you? I just believe in social cohesion, we have that more now and we didn’t have it so much before and in my opinion that is a good thing, e.g. society is getting better.

References Alex Jones in another thread, probably not a neo liberal then.

You sound like a libertarian civic nationalist then, or what I like to refer as globalist lite.

For the record I am not a civic nationalist but instead am an ethnic nationalist. Uses the word progress nonchalantly repetitively, progressing into what exactly? Do you even know?

The reference to Alex Jones was just to say anyone with little resources can become a political force. Noam Chomsky is the guy I most identify with.

For me progress here means moving toward a society in which people are treated based on what they do, not who they are.

Become a political force? Not in a rigged political system they can’t.

Noam Chomsky? Definitely not a libertarian, not in the American sense at least.

Neo liberal anarchist? What are your politics? I am an autocratic national socialist political renegade from the underground, pleasure to meet your acquaintance.

Don’t judge people on who they are but what they do, I take what you mean by this is some sort of occupational sentiment through economics.

Guess what, all of that is meaningless amongst the future technology of transhumanism with the introduction of A.I. Such a political economic judgement of people is pure elitist garbage.

Don’t mind me, I’m just deconstructing your entire world view over here.

Here are my politics to a large extent.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

But I don’t necessarily think people who disagree are idiots or people who agree smart. In fact, I have found that almost no one is an idiot. That is how I see humans, that people are creative and very knowledgeable.

Yes, the European libertarian socialist movement differs completely from the American libertarian capitalist movement of the United States. Most in North America have no idea what libertarian socialism is. (Or any kind of socialism for that matter.)

For me there is political realism and naivety where most people fall under the later.

I just don’t see any problem with society. Everyone’s always talking about things like that and I’m just like…um…deal with reality. You can’t change the world.

K: yes, yes you can change the world… even in the 20th century, we had
single individuals change the world… Gandhi and MLK for example…
changing the world is actually rather easy… but making positive change
that is transformational… that is hard…

Kropotkin