Morality And Ethics: How Nihilists And Idealists Are Right

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Re: Morality And Ethics: How Nihilists And Idealists Are Rig

Postby Gloominary » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:32 am

Zero_Sum wrote:
Gloominary wrote:He was born in 280 bc, he believed humans were totally selfish, and most people were ignorant and stupid.
If they weren't told what to do at knifepoint, for their own good and the good of the state, by the dictator and his army, all hell would break loose, there could be no democracy, or liberty.
He thought the dictator should make most of the laws, but also be subject to them, his own laws, hence the philosophical school he founded was known as legalism.
Han fei believed in the supremacy of the king, and the law.
It was one of the major schools of Chinese thought, along with Confucianism, Daoism, the philosophy of Mo, and the philosophy of Yang.
At one point it was the dominant philosophy in China, but eventually Confucianism supplanted it among the elite, and Daoism and Buddhism among the people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Fei


He sounds like my kind of philosopher king then. I will have to read up on this.

Yea you should, I think it'll resonate with you.
User avatar
Gloominary
Thinker
 
Posts: 840
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

Re: Morality And Ethics: How Nihilists And Idealists Are Rig

Postby Gloominary » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:39 am

At the time of Han Fei, there was no China, instead there were many independent kingdoms, each warring for supremacy, and many independent schools of thought as well, each vying for the hearts and minds of Chinese, but legalism helped one kingdom flourish, and unite all the others under its dominion by brute force, and out of that, imperial China was born, and it lasted for nearly 2000 years.
User avatar
Gloominary
Thinker
 
Posts: 840
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

Re: Morality And Ethics: How Nihilists And Idealists Are Rig

Postby Zero_Sum » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:40 am

Gloominary wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:
Gloominary wrote:He was born in 280 bc, he believed humans were totally selfish, and most people were ignorant and stupid.
If they weren't told what to do at knifepoint, for their own good and the good of the state, by the dictator and his army, all hell would break loose, there could be no democracy, or liberty.
He thought the dictator should make most of the laws, but also be subject to them, his own laws, hence the philosophical school he founded was known as legalism.
Han fei believed in the supremacy of the king, and the law.
It was one of the major schools of Chinese thought, along with Confucianism, Daoism, the philosophy of Mo, and the philosophy of Yang.
At one point it was the dominant philosophy in China, but eventually Confucianism supplanted it among the elite, and Daoism and Buddhism among the people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Fei


He sounds like my kind of philosopher king then. I will have to read up on this.

Yea you should, I think it'll resonate with you.


Okay, so Confucianism prevailed over Han Fei's legalism because of Confucian individualism, every fucking time it is individualism! The more I read into extreme forms of individualism the more I come to despise it. Society is collective based not individualist!

Society is not the sum of its individual parts but rather its entire whole together!
Last edited by Zero_Sum on Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.
User avatar
Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

Re: Morality And Ethics: How Nihilists And Idealists Are Rig

Postby Zero_Sum » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:41 am

Gloominary wrote:At the time of Han Fei, there was no China, instead there were many independent kingdoms, each warring for supremacy, and many independent schools of thought as well, each vying for the hearts and minds of Chinese, but legalism helped one kingdom flourish, and unite all the others under its dominion by brute force, and out of that, imperial China was born, and it lasted for nearly 2000 years.

Well yeah, say what you want about dictatorships but understand that they're very effective concerning societal coordination. They've effectively created all nations that we all live in currently.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.
User avatar
Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

Re: Morality And Ethics: How Nihilists And Idealists Are Rig

Postby Gloominary » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:52 am

Rather than Confucianism being based on individualism, it was based on the family, and tradition. Confucians believed there should be a king, but they thought the king should have limits, he shouldn't micromanage, or be too harsh, otherwise the people had the right to rebel.
They believed father should rule over son, son over mother, and mother over daughter.
They thought the king should rule over his subjects, but with leniency, compassion, and according to Chinese Customs, where as legalists were more radical, revolutionary, they didn't care about religion, nor tradition, they were secular progressives.
They thought the law should be brutal, uncompromising, that the people had no right to rebel.

I guess you could say it's sort of the same difference between constitutional monarchy and totalitarian dictatorship, Confucianism and legalism.
Confucianism also upheld traditional hierarchies, the nobility, where as legalism was radical here too, they wanted to do away with the old aristocracy, and the relationship between it and the people, and appoint new rulers at will, based more on merit than nepotism.
Legalism was a very top-down philosophy, where as Confucianism preferred a more organic hierachy, and ultimately it was Confucianism in China that won out.
User avatar
Gloominary
Thinker
 
Posts: 840
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

Previous

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users