## New school shooting, leftist response

Discussion of the recent unfolding of history.

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

It looks like the chillruns with the media corporate spotlight now are leading the charge to ban assault weapons and tougher gun regulations in the country. Will organized chillruns being used in the latest national political circus be the tipping point in disarming a majority of the United States population?

Let's find out.....
Last edited by Zero_Sum on Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

United States economically collapsing and gearing up for world conflict militarily where within the domestic front the sole focus being on disarmament under various facades of public safety.

Nope, I'm sure there is no correlation within all of that at all. It's probably nothing......
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Gloominary wrote:No I'm dead, fucking, serious, if 10 people are murdered, it doesn't matter if they died by knife, or gunshot, or grenade, or being ran over with a car, all's that matters is, they died.
What does it matter???

You're out of touch with reality.

Try to kill 10 people with a knife, compared to using an AR-15.

Be honest.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher

Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Gloominary wrote:No I'm dead, fucking, serious, if 10 people are murdered, it doesn't matter if they died by knife, or gunshot, or grenade, or being ran over with a car, all's that matters is, they died.
What does it matter???

You're out of touch with reality.

Try to kill 10 people with a knife, compared to using an AR-15.

Be honest.

You obviously haven't been paying attention to knife attacks in England, Sweden, France, and Germany.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Zero_Sum wrote:Ideas floating around now is teachers being able to do their jobs with conceal and carry permits having firearms on themselves.

"Alright little Billy, if you don't recite your ABC's I am going to fire a round in your face!"

I love the rotting smell of a disgusting decadent dying society breathing its last gasps of air.

You’re even dumber than I had thought. A teacher with a conceal and carry somehow equals using that concealed and carried gun to threaten their own students? There is absolutely zero correlation here. And zero reasoning.

The only rotting disgusting smell here is coming from you, from where your brain used to be.
EIHWAZ PERTHO NAUTHIZ

ANSUZ

URUZ
Philosopher

Posts: 2051
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:14 am
Location: The topoi

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Zero_Sum wrote:You obviously haven't been paying attention to knife attacks in England, Sweden, France, and Germany.

It's easier to kill 10 people with an AR-15 than it is a knife.

You and Gloominary are taking a foolish position. Is that the argument you want to defend, that it's in any "comparable" or similar to kill people with knives instead of guns?
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher

Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

UrGod wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:Ideas floating around now is teachers being able to do their jobs with conceal and carry permits having firearms on themselves.

"Alright little Billy, if you don't recite your ABC's I am going to fire a round in your face!"

I love the rotting smell of a disgusting decadent dying society breathing its last gasps of air.

You’re even dumber than I had thought. A teacher with a conceal and carry somehow equals using that concealed and carried gun to threaten their own students? There is absolutely zero correlation here. And zero reasoning.

The only rotting disgusting smell here is coming from you, from where your brain used to be.

It was a joke man, lighten up. It does however illustrate a zero trust society which the United States represents very well socially.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:You obviously haven't been paying attention to knife attacks in England, Sweden, France, and Germany.

It's easier to kill 10 people with an AR-15 than it is a knife.

You and Gloominary are taking a foolish position. Is that the argument you want to defend, that it's in any "comparable" or similar to kill people with knives instead of guns?

I am arguing that there are numerous ways for individuals or groups of people to go on a mass murder spree where even if you got rid of guns it's still going to happen. There are numerous ways of killing large numbers of people without the usage of guns. That's just the most basic simple method, there are other ways most people haven't even contemplated where it is as easy as getting household supplies from your local Home Depot.

Also, I don't like the idea of a disarmed population because I already don't trust (or like) the current United States government where I would definitely not trust it even more if it held on all the weapons.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

It should be common sense.

It's obviously critical how people go on killing sprees. It's as different as the Florida school massacre versus 9-11. Whether you use an AR-15, or an airplane, the means is obviously important. Discounting the how is just foolish.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher

Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:It should be common sense.

It's obviously critical how people go on killing sprees. It's as different as the Florida school massacre versus 9-11. Whether you use an AR-15, or an airplane, the means is obviously important. Discounting the how is just foolish.

You people are so focused on the tools of killing that none of you dare go into the behavioral sociological motivations, causes, and reactions of it. Until you cross into those murky waters of human nature nothing changes, nothing changes at all. Most people are afraid or are unwilling to because it would destroy a lot of narratives within society now that a majority just take for granted. You all are concerned with the symptoms but not the actual causes.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Zero_Sum wrote:You people are so focused on the tools of killing that none of you dare go into the sociological motivation, causes, and reactions of it. Until you cross into those murky waters of human nature nothing changes, nothing changes at all. Most people are afraid or are unwilling to because it would destroy a lot of narratives within society now that a majority just take for granted. You all are concerned with the symptoms but not the actual causes.

I can easily go into the why along with the how.

The point is how society can go about limiting the damage caused by mass-murderers. Not many people address the why, but the how is more obvious. Bullying, for example, I don't think people are really serious about changing that behavior. There will always be weak, meek members of society, who becoming the whipping-boys and girls. These are the ones who do go on rampages, as acts of vengeance and revenge, against the ones who oppress them. But I don't want to misconstrue the blame. It's not a matter of "who's the bigger victim", the shooter or the shoot-ee.

According to Leftism, everybody (except straight white males) are inherently 'victims' just for being born. So that argument is a lost cause.

After 9-11, it should be obvious now, the mass population is not interested in the why behind violence. The masses are focused on the 'how', not the why. The "why" is left to the intelligencia to figure out, and solve.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher

Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:You people are so focused on the tools of killing that none of you dare go into the sociological motivation, causes, and reactions of it. Until you cross into those murky waters of human nature nothing changes, nothing changes at all. Most people are afraid or are unwilling to because it would destroy a lot of narratives within society now that a majority just take for granted. You all are concerned with the symptoms but not the actual causes.

I can easily go into the why along with the how.

The point is how society can go about limiting the damage caused by mass-murderers. Not many people address the why, but the how is more obvious. Bullying, for example, I don't think people are really serious about changing that behavior. There will always be weak, meek members of society, who becoming the whipping-boys and girls. These are the ones who do go on rampages, as acts of vengeance and revenge, against the ones who oppress them. But I don't want to misconstrue the blame. It's not a matter of "who's the bigger victim", the shooter or the shoot-ee.

According to Leftism, everybody (except straight white males) are inherently 'victims' just for being born. So that argument is a lost cause.

After 9-11, it should be obvious now, the mass population is not interested in the why behind violence. The masses are focused on the 'how', not the why. The "why" is left to the intelligencia to figure out, and solve.

The solutions of how means nothing without addressing the why.

Also, the intelligentsia are whores that sell themselves to the highest bidder. They're not concerned with the why either.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Silhouette wrote:Are you anti-gun? Well there's no correlation between gun ownership and gun murders so all your fears were unfounded in practice after all. Deal with that!

But also, are you pro-gun? Well it turns out that all the rhetoric about needing a gun to protect yourself was equally unfounded in practice after all too. Suck it!

But then we have the country stats that show less guns = more violence and of course, kennesaw vs chicago.

In reality, I need a gun to combat critters and it's nice to grab one when something is making a ruckus outside. Since I can't see in the dark and don't have fangs, claws, and thick hide, I need some advantage over the animals. And teens parked in my yard for a bj seem to take me a bit more serious if I'm tote'n when I tell them this isn't a playground. And I know people who like to hunt and stock their freezer with meat to save a few bucks at the expense of a couple bucks that would otherwise be gnawing on my garden.

There are lots of reasons to own guns that don't involve shooting schools and I don't want my rights taken because of some dumbasses not fixing the problem of the poor kid who lost his mother to flu and his girlfriend to some jerk and consequently started hating everyone because they were obviously worthy of such hate or he would not have hated them. The problem is the uncaring, polarized and hateful society that drives people to such explosive lengths. That kid should have been helped long ago, but they didn't give a shit and now they've inherited the wind and rather than address the problem, they want to create a safe space where they're allowed to hate on whomever they want with no real consequences, but they won't succeed because next it will be box trucks or dodge chargers any way one can think to explode onto the society that's nurtured such resentment in them.

___________________________________

They mean with however many guns lying around, as long as there are at least some, the vast majority of people still don't want to use them against each other and don't, and the ones who do will pick them up and cause much more devastation than if they weren't around.

I don't know why the vegas shooter didn't drive a truck into the crowd. It would have been much easier than lugging dozens of guns up an elevator and then missing most of his targets. A big heavy truck would have killed 100s in one go. Then he could have shot himself in the mouth with his revolver.

About this subject of criminals getting their hands on guns regardless of laws, that's not the full story. You see, with guns few and far between, black markets do indeed still sell them but at vastly inflated prices.

Nah, when pot was illegal, you could get an ounce for $100. Now it's$500 in a dispensary. Stolen guns sell for less than half the cost of those bought legally. And if you're a thief, guns are free.
Serendipper
Philosopher

Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:30 pm

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Gloominary wrote:No I'm dead, fucking, serious, if 10 people are murdered, it doesn't matter if they died by knife, or gunshot, or grenade, or being ran over with a car, all's that matters is, they died.
What does it matter???

You're out of touch with reality.

Try to kill 10 people with a knife, compared to using an AR-15.

Be honest.

If it's easier to get and carry a gun, it's easier for, whatever you want to call them, I'm tempted to use the word 'sociopath', but I'm uncomfortable with how mainline psychology classifies people, additionally not all sociopaths are violent, and not all violence is committed by sociopaths, so I'll just say violent people (which includes, but isn't limited to spree killers, anyone who's sufficiently violent to be potentially lethal), to get and carry a gun.
However, if it's easier to get/carry a gun, it's also easier for non-violent people to get/carry a gun, which deters some violent people from acting on their violent feelings, and which makes it easier for non-violent people to defend themselves and others when violent people do act on their violent feelings.
That's not just my theory, that's what the data shows, the data supports my theory, it doesn't support yours.
Last edited by Gloominary on Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Gloominary
Philosopher

Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Zero_Sum wrote:
UrGod wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:Ideas floating around now is teachers being able to do their jobs with conceal and carry permits having firearms on themselves.

"Alright little Billy, if you don't recite your ABC's I am going to fire a round in your face!"

I love the rotting smell of a disgusting decadent dying society breathing its last gasps of air.

You’re even dumber than I had thought. A teacher with a conceal and carry somehow equals using that concealed and carried gun to threaten their own students? There is absolutely zero correlation here. And zero reasoning.

The only rotting disgusting smell here is coming from you, from where your brain used to be.

It was a joke man, lighten up. It does however illustrate a zero trust society which the United States represents very well socially.

No it wasn’t a joke, you actually made that idiotic point with no indication of joking and every indication of actually meaning what you said to be taken as you said it.
EIHWAZ PERTHO NAUTHIZ

ANSUZ

URUZ
Philosopher

Posts: 2051
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:14 am
Location: The topoi

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:You obviously haven't been paying attention to knife attacks in England, Sweden, France, and Germany.

It's easier to kill 10 people with an AR-15 than it is a knife.

You and Gloominary are taking a foolish position. Is that the argument you want to defend, that it's in any "comparable" or similar to kill people with knives instead of guns?

It's also easier to kill someone with an AR-15, with an AR-15 or another kind of gun.
Last edited by Gloominary on Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Gloominary
Philosopher

Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

UrGod wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:No it wasn’t a joke, you actually made that idiotic point with no indication of joking and every indication of actually meaning what you said to be taken as you said it.

You really can't take a joke. Whatever you say my serious delicate snowflake, whatever you say.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:It should be common sense.

It's obviously critical how people go on killing sprees. It's as different as the Florida school massacre versus 9-11. Whether you use an AR-15, or an airplane, the means is obviously important. Discounting the how is just foolish.

It only really matters insofar as you can use the info to prevent further deaths, if you can't, it doesn't matter how murderers are murdering non-murderers.

Gloominary
Philosopher

Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Serendipper wrote:Yup, but the argument that someone can successfully fend-off the gov is moot since many have tried and no one has succeeded since the 1700s during the Revolutionary War when the people fought-off the Brits who had to cross an ocean by sail wielding only muskets and a few cannons. Now their gov is in their backyard and infinitely more weaponized. Whether or not people have ARs is irrelevant to the outcome and a "well-regulated militia" can't exist for the implied purpose of guarding a free state.
You have to deal with PR however. I mean, look at what insurgents manage in Iraq. Add in then that the army and police are shooting americans, and you have heavy pr problems. No guns out there and the few who have can be written off more easily as terrorists. A large armed resistance, even with no hope of winning, can cause all sorts of problems maintaining order in the police and army. Not a few terrorists, not over quickly, not just weirdos, our neighbors and people will drop out of the army and not in small numbers. Even more so police. People watching will also get sick and questions the martial law, the military response, official stories.
Karpel Tunnel
Philosopher

Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:26 pm

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:You people are so focused on the tools of killing that none of you dare go into the sociological motivation, causes, and reactions of it. Until you cross into those murky waters of human nature nothing changes, nothing changes at all. Most people are afraid or are unwilling to because it would destroy a lot of narratives within society now that a majority just take for granted. You all are concerned with the symptoms but not the actual causes.

I can easily go into the why along with the how.

The point is how society can go about limiting the damage caused by mass-murderers. Not many people address the why, but the how is more obvious. Bullying, for example, I don't think people are really serious about changing that behavior. There will always be weak, meek members of society, who becoming the whipping-boys and girls. These are the ones who do go on rampages, as acts of vengeance and revenge, against the ones who oppress them. But I don't want to misconstrue the blame. It's not a matter of "who's the bigger victim", the shooter or the shoot-ee.

According to Leftism, everybody (except straight white males) are inherently 'victims' just for being born. So that argument is a lost cause.

After 9-11, it should be obvious now, the mass population is not interested in the why behind violence. The masses are focused on the 'how', not the why. The "why" is left to the intelligencia to figure out, and solve.

Just as there will always be bullies and victims of bullying, some victims will always carry out acts of vengeance later on in life.
Instead of spending billions of dollars banning guns, when the data shows it won't make a difference, we could spend billions of dollars on reducing bullying, or on getting anxious and depressed people some actual help, instead of sweeping their problems under the carpet with experimental drugs, which seem to do more harm than good, or, just live with the 1 out of a million possibility of being caught in a shooting spree, like we live with all the other 1 out of a millions, and give up on the liberal, utopian dream of making things 100% safe,
a dream you've wholeheartedly embraced, here at least.

Gloominary
Philosopher

Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Serendipper wrote:
Gloominary wrote:So African Americans, for whatever reasons, genetic, environmental, I don't want to get into that here, it's unnecessary, are 8 times more likely to murder people than White Americans.
At the very least this is part of the reason why America has a higher homicide rate than your average European Country, who doesn't have a large African (American) Population.

That's a good observation. I wonder if it's true that intelligent people are more likely to kill themselves than someone else. What are the murder rates vs suicide rates of japan? Murder rate = 6.2/100k and suicide rate = 26/100k. Japan is has the 3rd highest IQ by country (105). Switzerland is 101 and the US is 98. I bet one could correlate murder and suicide rates with iq.

If so, the murder problem could be ended with education, but then we'd have a suicide problem.

You can cure ignorance, but it's pretty hard to cure dumb.
African Americans are less intelligent.
I'm not going to speculate on why.
They're also more aggressive, they have more testosterone, and that's almost as certainly genetic as their frizzy hair is, at least in part.
They're also poorer, less educated.
Perhaps we could help lift the African American community out of poverty and ignorance, or perhaps we could give them anti-testosterone and estrogen pills to Asianize/feminize them, or perhaps we could get them more involved in theatre, ballet and classical music instead of break dancing and gangsta rap, I don't know, but I do know what we shouldn't do, we shouldn't allow America's higher homicide rate to continue to be blamed on guns, when African Americans are several times more murderous than Latinos, who're several times more murderous than whites, which's at the very least a very big part of the reason why America has a higher homicide rate than the European mean.

Gloominary
Philosopher

Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Gloominary wrote:
Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Zero_Sum wrote:You people are so focused on the tools of killing that none of you dare go into the sociological motivation, causes, and reactions of it. Until you cross into those murky waters of human nature nothing changes, nothing changes at all. Most people are afraid or are unwilling to because it would destroy a lot of narratives within society now that a majority just take for granted. You all are concerned with the symptoms but not the actual causes.

I can easily go into the why along with the how.

The point is how society can go about limiting the damage caused by mass-murderers. Not many people address the why, but the how is more obvious. Bullying, for example, I don't think people are really serious about changing that behavior. There will always be weak, meek members of society, who becoming the whipping-boys and girls. These are the ones who do go on rampages, as acts of vengeance and revenge, against the ones who oppress them. But I don't want to misconstrue the blame. It's not a matter of "who's the bigger victim", the shooter or the shoot-ee.

According to Leftism, everybody (except straight white males) are inherently 'victims' just for being born. So that argument is a lost cause.

After 9-11, it should be obvious now, the mass population is not interested in the why behind violence. The masses are focused on the 'how', not the why. The "why" is left to the intelligencia to figure out, and solve.

Just as there will always be bullies and victims of bullying, some victims will always carry out acts of vengeance later on in life.
Instead of spending billions of dollars banning guns, when the data shows it won't make a difference, we could spend billions of dollars on reducing bullying, or on getting anxious and depressed people some actual help, instead of sweeping their problems under the carpet with experimental drugs, which seem to do more harm than good, or, just live with the 1 out of a million possibility of being caught in a shooting spree, like we live with all the other 1 out of a millions, and give up on the liberal, utopian dream of making things 100% safe,
a dream you've wholeheartedly embraced, here at least.

We will never get rid of social inequality as it will always exist however we could in practical terms severely limit it if we wanted to keeping it at a minimum. The capitalist paradigm of society however doesn't believe in limiting it since in all reality it thrives on social inequality and loves it. In capitalism there is hyper competition in all facets of living where it triumphantly celebrates its winners and loves dragging its losers everywhere in defeat/mockery for public showing.

In such a culture or paradigm the losers are poked and prodded in every facet of existence making sure they can have pride in nothing, their entire self worth is stripped away from them. Their entire sense of self and personal identity eroded into nothingness.

Of course we wonder why people crack up and violently snap on others when we have a culture like this that it's absurd to even ask why to begin with. No, instead of focusing on socio economic dilemmas which I believe is the real origin of all this pent up rage we instead talk about disarming this portion of the population keeping them well medicated, of course this does nothing addressing the overall issues and will accomplish nothing but for the ignorant along with those that control this society that's good enough for the status quo to remain in place. In all reality we can throw all the poisonous medications on this portion of society in the world and it will accomplish nothing in the long run.
The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

The temple mount will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and all the nations of the world will be ruled from there. All races, cultures, leaders, and nations will come to bow before the new messiah yet to come. All will come to know the chosen of God who refer themselves as Jews. For every Jew there will be a thousand goyim that will be their slaves as it was ordained by God. Every man, woman, and child will convert to Zionism.

Zero_Sum
New World Order Enthusiast

Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: United States- Greater Israel

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

Serendipper wrote:Chicago is a war zone in spite of its efforts to ban means of violent expression.

No statistical analysis is necessary because it's plain to see that there is something else at play. If mandating guns doesn't cause violence and restricting guns does not end violence, then guns are irrelevant.

An anti-gun advocate can easily grant that violence is more deeply rooted than what weapons are available, and that the impetus to commit violence exists is in people whether or not they have a gun. Guns are not part of human biology, they do not affect the limbic system or any other human biological systems that are relevant to violence. Nor do they influence societal factors that are relevant to violence any more than they affect biological factors.

None of this is in question.

What's in question is that, once guns are available, damage is far easier to cause and the potential to damage more severely and in more numbers is far more present - intentionally or by accident, on yourself or on others.

This is why in places that do not have violent people, where societal conditions do not either cause, exacerbate or influence violent tendencies in people, you can have as many guns as you like and people still won't use them on others any more than they would have used other weapons if guns were not available. These are the freest places and the places most deserving of the freedom to have guns. Places like Kennesaw are such places, places like Chicago are not. But the danger of saying "well in that case let places like Kennesaw have their guns" is that they may escape Kennesaw if people move, steal or trade outside an otherwise safe haven, and unstable or mentally ill people can move into Kennesaw and ruin their track record. So I still cannot be pro-gun for places like Kennesaw for the reason I stated in the previous mini-paragraph.

This is the same reason why we have speed limits even for responsible, capable and well-intentioned drivers. It's those irresponsible, incapable and ill-intentioned drivers who ruin it for everyone - and that sucks! But we accept it because it's our reality. Freedom with certain things is practical, and with other things it is not.

This is also why we reserve dangerous things to only the safest hands in many cases - e.g. surgery and healthcare in general. We should do the same for guns being reserved only for the military and (better) trained policemen, and we will hopefully be doing the same for cars once AI drivers are released.

Usually the right are pro-personal-responsibility, which is great for such questions as "what to do with dangerous things?" It is responsible to leave them only to responsible hands and to make it as hard as possible to let them get into the hands of irresponsible people. We already do with many things but for some reason, way too many people can't seem to move the same mentality to the use of guns. It's your responsibility to ensure that you are involved in applying these same restrictions to guns as well as all these areas that people generally accept.

Silhouette
Philosopher

Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 1:27 am
Location: Existence

### Re: New school shooting, leftist response

@Serendipper

It sounds good, but if it were true, then we could arm our prisoners and expect the equalization of power to secure peace.

Interesting point, here's what I think: arming some types of people will deter violence, arming other types will entice it.
Prisons tend to be made up of people who're more risk prone, meaning they're more willing to risk their lives and the lives of others to attain easy power and privilege, where as the general population tend to be made up of people who're more risk adverse.
When you hand prisoners guns, they think more about the benefit: easy power/privilege, if I get lucky, me and my homies are going to kill peeps and take their shit, where as the general population will think more about the cost: easy come/easy go, if I don't get lucky, me and my friends are going to be killed while trying to take peoples stuff.
Prisoners would rather live in a world where there's fewer survivors/victors, but more (easy) spoils, where as the gen pop would rather live in a world where there's many survivors/victors, but less (easy) spoils.
In some cases this is more due to genetics (innate lack of will and/or ability), in some cases this is due more to social, and self conditioning, and in other cases this is due more to environment.
The harder people think/feel it is to get the things they want, especially the things they think/feel they need, and the larger the disparity between the haves/have nots, the less likely people will be willing play by the existing rules, or be nonviolent, opting for a different set of rules potentially more beneficial to them and their class, or no rules at all.
And of course this is more true of some people than others.
Desperate times: desperate measures, people are more dangerous when they think/feel they have little-nothing to lose, and this is especially true of many-most prisoners, particularly lifers.

The difference between prisoners and other people is their held philosophies, tendencies, mindsets. So, peace comes to armed people not by the addition of arms, but from a philosophy of not using those arms to kill people which, somehow, coincidences with people who choose to arm themselves.

People who feel strongly about protection of the right to bear arms also feel strongly about not using those arms. And people who do not feel strongly about protecting the right to bear arms also do not feel strongly about not shooting people. Why that is so, I can only speculate. I suspect it has something to do with dogmatism vs open-mindedness and moral-relativism vs absolutism.

Absolutists are dogmatic in their beliefs and are not open-minded in discussion. They are not morally relative. They do not hold beliefs on reason and evidence, but assert their beliefs to be absolute; therefore they have no cognitive mechanism to undermine their own beliefs. Arguing with those sorts is futile, but they can be trusted not to shoot you for the same bullheaded reason.

Moral relativists are opposite. They're open-minded and therefore have a mechanism to change their mind. "Thou shalt not kill" is not absolute to them. If at some moment they deem you to be evil, then the ends of your extermination justifies the act of murder. Probably, because they know that about themselves, they seek to ban the means of killing.

That's my theory to explain why guns coincide with less use of guns.
This is an interesting theory, and while it may work for America, I'm not sure it works for the rest of the world.

This is an interesting idea.
While I think morality might play a role, if it does, it's probably secondary to fear.
In the US it may be true that the people (typically more rural WASPs) who believe they have a right to guns are more moral in general than the people who don't, for genetic and/or religious reaosns, and/or it may be their morality differs, they believe the ends (power/privlege) never or very rarely justify the means (big government/violence).
However, this isn't just a phenomenon in the US, all over the world, people seem to be at least as safe, if not safer in countries where the gen pop is more armed, rather than less, and personally I doubt this correlation between morality, or a peculiar kind of morality (duty ethics, means over ends) and guns exists across the board in every country.
Last edited by Gloominary on Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Gloominary
Philosopher

Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Dislocated

PreviousNext

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users