WendyDarling wrote:The Democratic owned US security agencies (all of them including CIA, DHS, etc.), the whole bandwagon, have been covering up Hillary Clinton's illegal messes and actively seeking to discredit Trump since the 2016 campaign.
WendyDarling wrote:The Russia investigation is the conspiracy theory. A year later and the investigation has nothing to show for their efforts, but their big fat never ending paychecks off the dimes of the taxpayers. No votes were changed and the government is trying to scare Americans into supporting the federal government overseeing the elections...so the feds can centrally rig them via technology.
WendyDarling wrote: A year later and the [Russia] investigation has nothing to show for their efforts
WendyDarling wrote:The Russia investigation is the conspiracy theory. A year later and the investigation has nothing to show for their efforts, but their big fat never ending paychecks off the dimes of the taxpayers. No votes were changed and the government is trying to scare Americans into supporting the federal government overseeing the elections...so the feds can centrally rig them via technology.
What do you mean nothing to show? They've made 4 arrests.
WendyDarling wrote:Like I said, the investigation has not turned up anything to hang Trump or his campaign which is who they are gunning for.
The point is that you can't say this yet.
They have made 4 arrests of people inside the Trump campaign, and they've still got significant leverage on two of them. The investigation is ongoing, and they're interviewing people higher and higher in the campaign.
From the evidence we have, there is just no basis to reach that conclusion.
WendyDarling wrote:they have no evidence
1) there have been multiple arrests of senior campaign officials related to illegal contacts with the Russian government
2) yet more senior campaign officials are being interviewed regularly, and 3) no charges have been brought against a sitting president.
WendyDarling wrote:Not in connection with illegal campaign dealings...
WendyDarling wrote:More and more NOTHING.
Lying to the FBI about contacts with the Russian government, which he made as part of the transition and at the direction of senior officials in the transition?
Meno_ wrote:Does the charge that the FBI bias is a reality mesh with the counter charge that the right is planting this idea for their political agenda?
Fixed Cross wrote:Meno_ wrote:Does the charge that the FBI bias is a reality mesh with the counter charge that the right is planting this idea for their political agenda?
Oh Jesus.
Look at the evidence.
This is why you lefties don't exist. You can't accept that there are such things as fact.
Thank heaven you lost. We'd all be gone thanks you.
Repent, open your eyes, start to exist.
Then you wil be worthy of us.
WendyDarling wrote:The investigation is to uncover collusion regarding the election process itself.
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
WendyDarling wrote:The charges stem from conversations after the fact of the election, once again AFTER the election, nothing pertains to the election process of co-conspiracy between Trump and Russia.
... defendant PAPADOPOULOS learned he would be an advisor to the Campaign in early March, and met the professor on or about March 14, 2016; the professor only took interest in defendant PAPADOPOULOS because of his status with the Campaign; and the professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails" on or about April 26, 2016, when defendant PAPADOPOULOS had been a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign for over a month.
... defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood that the professor had substantial connections to Russian government officials (and had met with some ofthose officials in Moscow immediately prior to telling defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails") and, over a period of months, defendant PAPADOPOULOS repeatedly sought to use the professor's Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.
... defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the female Russian national on or about March 24, 2016, after he had become an adviser to the Campaign; he believed that she had connections to Russian government officials; and he sought to use her Russian connections over a period ofmonths in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.
No it isn't. According to the order appointing Mueller, he is to investigate:
Carleas wrote:Flynn pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI about conversations with the Russian ambassador that took place during the transition (December 2016). Those conversations took place at the direction of and in coordination with an unnamed "senior official of the Presidential Transition Team", who was advising him from Mar-a-Lago and was with other senior transition officials at the time of the direction and coordination. This is described in his guilty plea.
WendyDarling wrote:Where's proof that the public can believe?
Uccisore wrote:Which ...
What's your standard of evidence? Do the recent Dutch revelations do anything for you?
It's somewhat of a 'fluke' that the AIVD hackers were able to acquire such useful information in 2014.
The AIVD hackers are no longer in Cozy Bear's computer network. The Dutch espionage lasted between 1 and 2,5 years. Hacker groups frequently change their methods and even a different firewall can cut off access. The AIVD declined to respond to de Volkskrant's findings.
The Dutch access to the Russian hackers' network soon pays off. In November, the Russians prepare for an attack on one of their prime targets: the American State Department.
He thinks he's received an e-mail from the State Department - the e-mail address is similar - and clicks a link in the message. The link opens a website where the White House employee then enters his login credentials, now obtained by the Russians. And that is how the Russians infiltrate the White House.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users