What does justice mean in context of society? How would society determine what is justice?
One of the problems with societies is that they tend to distribute the costs of individual actions on the collective. This lessens the impact of both the good and bad decisions, contributing to the muddling of the two and even the idea that there is no such distinction. Libertarians especially seem to be completely delusional of how individual actions can affect the general well-being of a society.
The closest I came to the idea of Social Justice is this:
“It would be nice if people were forced to bear the direct natural consequences of their actions, instead of distributing the costs of their actions to the entire society. It would be perfect, for example, if Muslim immigrants raped and killed only those men and women who voted to import them. That would be so fucking awesome. Among other things, cucks and liberals would be made slaves of the enemies or killed, feminists would be raped and/or put into burqas or killed. And WN who opposed all this degeneracy would not have to suffer it and would get their own white state which would eventually rise to be powerful enough to push back Muslims.”
This is basically the idea that people are forced to bear the consequences and the ultimate logical conclusion of their beliefs and actions.
Unfortunately, due to how modern society is structured currently, this is impossible.
However, I still hold that it is possible to construct such a fair and just system. It would involve an authoritarian approach where the state imitates nature and forces people to immediately and individually face the consequences and the ultimate logical conclusions of their beliefs, instead of forcing everybody in society to do so. This has the benefit of filtering out the degenerates and filth who want to bring everybody in society down to their level, and below.
For example, if J.K. Rowling supports immigration (and she does), then she would be forced to live with immigrants and accomodate as many of them in her home as she can. Only those who support immigration would be forced to interact with migrants, and if they are to be raped, murdered, killed, etc. by the migrants, the police nor anybody else would intervene. This sounds nice but it would be almost impossible to organize.
It would also be just if the laws of nature were set up so that only those who advocate for immigration suffer it, but like I said, unfortunately this is not so, and this is why the state/system itself needs to imitate nature, to ensure justice is done and that degenerates don’t escape unharmed.
A simpler solution would be to just force people individually to bear the ultimate logical conclusion of their retarded ideologies. This means that cuckservatives and liberals who promote the kind of politics which would end in a country where whites are the minority, get sent to places where whites actually are a minority.
Cuckservative and liberal politcians would be forced to live in 99% nigger neighborhoods and such. This would result in them either learning the reality of race the hard way, or getting killed. Probably both. Either way, great.
The ultimate logical conclusion of feminism is getting conquered by another country, since feminism is a factor which weakens its own group. So feminists would be sold into slavery and forced to be at the mercy of those who would most likely conquer them after white countries have grown too weak - currently, Islamic sand-niggers.
I believe that it is because of this free spreading and accumulation of degeneracy due to societal distribution of consequences of actions that history is cyclical and civilizations/societies tend to go through cycles.
If we found a way to prevent this accumulation of degeneracy by imitating nature through an authoritarian state, with Right Wing Death Squads whose specific purpose is to purge degeneracy, I think we could break away from this cycle into a period of infinite progress and growth.