Overton Window

newrepublic.com/article/138003/ … dow-theory

Recently came across the Overton Window theory and how it can be used to change society. The above article concludes that the Overton Window’s appeal is in the illusion of center, but I think it highlights an more general problem with free speech which can be used as a tool to dramatically change society.

You can take any (unthinkable) idea and make it normal. Say, cannibalism. With free speech and the shifting of overton window, we can actually make an unthinkable idea, like cannibalism, accepted normal. Step by step. First, enter the discussion. Then bring in the scholars. Then polarize and popularize the issue to both extremes. Then ‘force’ people to pick a moderate center as compromise between the two in order to resolve the ‘conflict’.

Should free speech have limitations, as in having taboo subjects which should not have a place in public discourse?

This is how liberals have been fucking over society for a long time now.

In the 19th century liberals wanted to free blacks, conservatives opposed them, saying: What’s next, are you going to liberate women? Liberals: Of course not, just blacks, you’re committing the slippery slope fallacy!

Enter the start of 20th century, liberals want to liberate women and allow them to work, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, sexual liberation? Liberals: Of course not, women are not promiscuous, whores are the exception.

1960s and liberals want to sexually liberate women, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, are we going to allow homosexuality too? Liberals: Of course not, just heterosexual expressions of sexuality

1980s and liberals want to liberate and normalize homosexual relationships, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, are they going to marry too? Liberals: Of course not, just let them be, their personal lives don’t concern you

2000s and liberals want gay marriage and manage to legalize it in some countries, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, tranny acceptance? Liberals: Of course not, these are just fringe crazies, can’t compare them to decent homos

2010 to now, liberals want to normalize tranny acceptance.

Some years later, around 2014-2015 or so, even more extreme insanities began occurring, like trans-racial, otherkin, huge adult men pretending to be 6 year old girls, stuff a person some decades ago wouldn’t believe if you told them.

The only question remains: What degenerate practice will be the next on the liberal agenda to force into mainstream and normalize, demanding tolerance and deriding any opposition as mindless hate and “bigotry”.
Will it be pedophilia? Zoophilia? From the premises of liberalism and the shallow liberal understanding of “no harm”, both can easily be justified if you follow the liberal logic consistently to its insane end.
This is also why I do not identify as a conservative. To be a conservative now means to conserve all this filth, and to be a liberal means to want to conserve it, plus add more filth on top. Myself, I prefer to clean up the filth.

Limiting free speech now would be conserving this filth.
No, once all the filth accumulated by previous generations is cleaned up and a state of purity and cleanliness is established, THEN we limit free speech (aka we limit the input of filth).

Free speech can swing both ways. One of the major contributors to be recognized in the Rwandan genocide was Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), a local radio station which incited violence against the Tutsis. The democratic principle of free speech was also used as a defense in the genocide trials that followed. This particular genocide happened very quickly (after downing of the plane carrying heads of govts), with death tolls as high as 800,000 in just 100 days.

[I think the Belgians should carry some of the responsibility for the genocide which happened, since it was they who put Tutsis over Hutus and intensified resentment between the two groups…but that goes into another discussion].

Is this guy Gobbo?

nickmartinezofficial.com/index.p … sexuality/

At first I thought it might be satire from somebody on the right, but holy shit, this seems real:

nickmartinezofficial.com/index.p … arguement/

The YT channel from one of the people running the site:

youtube.com/channel/UC9KFTvt … jcg/videos

This is why we need Fascism or National Socialism. This degeneracy shouldn’t be preserved (cuckserved) and it sure as fuck shouldn’t be allowed to “progress” anymore. It needs to be destroyed with no mercy.