This is how liberals have been fucking over society for a long time now.
In the 19th century liberals wanted to free blacks, conservatives opposed them, saying: What’s next, are you going to liberate women? Liberals: Of course not, just blacks, you’re committing the slippery slope fallacy!
Enter the start of 20th century, liberals want to liberate women and allow them to work, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, sexual liberation? Liberals: Of course not, women are not promiscuous, whores are the exception.
1960s and liberals want to sexually liberate women, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, are we going to allow homosexuality too? Liberals: Of course not, just heterosexual expressions of sexuality
1980s and liberals want to liberate and normalize homosexual relationships, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, are they going to marry too? Liberals: Of course not, just let them be, their personal lives don’t concern you
2000s and liberals want gay marriage and manage to legalize it in some countries, conservatives oppose them saying what’s next, tranny acceptance? Liberals: Of course not, these are just fringe crazies, can’t compare them to decent homos
2010 to now, liberals want to normalize tranny acceptance.
Some years later, around 2014-2015 or so, even more extreme insanities began occurring, like trans-racial, otherkin, huge adult men pretending to be 6 year old girls, stuff a person some decades ago wouldn’t believe if you told them.
The only question remains: What degenerate practice will be the next on the liberal agenda to force into mainstream and normalize, demanding tolerance and deriding any opposition as mindless hate and “bigotry”.
Will it be pedophilia? Zoophilia? From the premises of liberalism and the shallow liberal understanding of “no harm”, both can easily be justified if you follow the liberal logic consistently to its insane end.
This is also why I do not identify as a conservative. To be a conservative now means to conserve all this filth, and to be a liberal means to want to conserve it, plus add more filth on top. Myself, I prefer to clean up the filth.
Limiting free speech now would be conserving this filth.
No, once all the filth accumulated by previous generations is cleaned up and a state of purity and cleanliness is established, THEN we limit free speech (aka we limit the input of filth).