Generation, Tradition, and the rise of the Far Right

Uccisore, where’ve you been dude?

OP was not a bad mapping of the terrain, you hit on some good points.

Definitely, and with nothing else to stand on to make their way in the world, a significant number of young left-leaning people have ended up latching onto whatever ideology was most readily available.

The largest problems unique to the left today are the perpetuation of identity politics and the cession of all other values to the pursuit of equity. What is needed here is needed everywhere: leaders who can put people in touch with necessary knowledge and values, and who can demonstrate a better way forward.

There are no problems in the left, the left itself is a problem. It is a memetic disease promoting weakness at best and outright self-destruction at worst.

After bringing liberalism to the Middle-East, the neocohenservatives will bring liberalism now to the Middle-Eastern and African replacement immigrants living in Western countries.

And why not?
If you actually believe in the blank slate theory then there is no reason not to and no reason why it shouldn’t work.

We have to double down on this progress thingy.
I have to admit, I’m a bit nervous about the future.
Can we please all double down on the classical liberalism, on all those things we did in the last decades to make things better more quickly?

#didn’t have enough proper liberalism
#need proper liberal messiah

Where is the heroin-e when you need some?

Far Right is nothing. It has no values.

The foundation of Couverture is lost today. Men and women are not equal, and traditional societies understand and accept this fact of nature. Women have an enormous “sexual power” which means advantage. Men do not. Thus in order for men and women to be “equal”, men must be given over lots of advantages and enticements in marriage. Otherwise marriage has very little to offer an average man. Why ought a man remain loyal to one woman, his wife, when his nature proclivity is promiscuity and chasing many women around? Male promiscuity is bad for society because it leads to internal friction, competition, and infighting. A society isn’t much of a “society” when the males are killing each-other for females.

And so, female power is restricted, legally through Couverture, and male power is enhanced, by allowing married males legal superiority and Rights (the original conception of rights, as meant in “classical liberalism”). Thus, traditionally, marriage enhanced the social and legal power of an average male, to coincide and “equalize” with the sexual power of an average woman. Obviously, a woman can “trade” her sexual worth, for security, at any point in her life. And that is the reality of average women anyway, who quickly learn in puberty, the seductive power of their beauty and sex, to average men.

Modern people don’t really conceive the extent to which “Classical” societies were, and still are run, around the world. Of course, marriage is relative to societies, cultures, and tribes. As is tradition.

Classically, a woman has immense sexual power, regardless of being married. Traditionally, marriage restrains and restricts a woman’s promiscuity as it does to the man too. The wife becomes the property, and responsibility, of the husband. She loses all her “rights”. However, a woman’s “rights” in life, classically, are different than men’s. What ought a woman have “rights” to in life, compared to men, when a woman can already “buy” an entire lifetime with the mere allure of her sexual offering? Sex is enough, and this is not something talked about very well in modern times.

Dowry has an extensive history, and a huge distinction between “modern” and classical eras. Do you know the reason and cause behind dowry? If a young woman lost her virginity before marriage, before the father relinquished it to another man, then she was of less value. Because a woman’s value revolves around her sexual chastity. Today this is known as the crime of rape. If a woman loses virginity, before or outside the allowance of her father, because she is the responsibility and property of her father, then she is marred, scarred, defaced, like writing graffiti on somebody’s else’s wall. Traditionally, the concept of rape was entirely dependent on a woman’s father.

Dowry is the payment to a husband’s family, on behalf the wife’s family, if the wife is impure or unchaste.

Traditionally and classically, in the older and archaic church and spiritual institutions, a woman could not even marry in “Conservative” churches unless she was/is Unchaste and Virgin. Thus, it was a very serious matter that a female “lost” her virginity (was taken) before her marriage. Essentially, a female who is promiscuous outside marriage and traditional society, was excluded an shunned from traditional (classical) society.

In truly conservative societies, this is still the norm today, although “foreign” to the modern world.

Most of your subsequent points are accurate, factual, and historical. I don’t have much to add, except, I personally reject this “White Sharia Islam” nonsense. Replacing one Abrahamic sect (Christianity) with another version (Islam), is not a proper answer. Europeans, White, should dig deep into the Past, Nature, Instinct, Genes, and really “get back to basics”, if heading toward the traditional, classical, conservative direction.

It is ironic and laughable that today’s, modern “cuckservatives” claim to have traditional marriages, when they marry unchaste women, sluts, promiscuous women, feminists, etc.

You can’t build from such severely cracked and sandy foundations, or if you do, then know your building, your “new world” culture, is destined to topple over within a century or two.

If you want to build something that lasts a millennium, or two, as the Catholic Order originally did and completed, admirably in my opinion, then the Rules must be followed ascetically and diligently. Marry white virgins, and from those, produce something higher.

Unfortunately most or all “value” comes from the Far Right.

The Right hand is the one that takes in resources. The Left hand is the one that spends it, or squanders it, in many cases.

One doesn’t have to outline very much how this expirimental neoliberal global multiculturalism is unsustainable going into the future. In the west we have disaster multiculturalism operated by both disaster socialism and disaster capitalism.

It is guided by the belief in the irrelevancy of culture, tradition, and race by highest maximum ideal that plagues the west namely homo economicus where all individuals are valued in so much of economic output. This has become the prevailing central value of the west the last hundred years or so.

Post-colonial, new world societies, the united states, are slave societies. They still are, except modern propaganda has become so sophisticated, that average, modern people, don’t realize or even have the slightest clue the extent of their slavery. For example, the average, modern, “westerner”, believes that he or she is “free”, but is just the opposite.

Those most enslaved, are the ones who tend to vocalize the loudest, how proud and “free” they are. Those who claim to be most “independent”, are usually severely dependent, on others.

I’d say that any real “freedom” begins with properly and correctly identifying institutions and systems of power.

It’s just his way of saying…

I generally prefer this from him than hearing the usual subversion lines.
‘Nothing’ grants space for having room for a more authentic identity.
Being more than a disembodied, rootless individual, an economic unit in the schemes of an elite which is estranged from the people they rule and have come to despise.

Lol

^^^That is funny.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioaex1oSw7Y[/youtube]


This positive message was sponsored by the Russians.

There are nationalists and then there are civic “nationalists” who are okay with anybody coming to the country as long as they share the same value, namely that anybody can come to the country.

They are globalists who call themselves nationalists because the globalists have been found out to be rats.

It’s not cool anymore to be a globalist, outside the geriatric degenerate club and so they jump ship, only to infest a new platform with the same old dis-ease.
Having their panties in a twist because they are not welcome everywhere.

The Far Right will continue to gain exponential power in the u.s. as long as liberal-leftism remains completely disloyal, unpatriotic, and fiscally irresponsible, by forcing future generations of children into deeper and deeper national debt.

After all, why did the Far Right and Nazis take power in Germany, except almost solely and primarily, as a response to crushing debt imposed on them by “internationalist cabals” (the jews)?

However in the u.s. those selling us out are our own neighbors and politicians.

Right-ism is synonymous with Moral Responsibility, for yourself and your own kind, family-first.

Only on the extreme far right can this kind of (insert word associated with evil from Oxford dictionary) discourse take place.
I’m honestly speechless.
I can’t even.
It’s 2017, bigots!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyRw2vAKxdI[/youtube]

I can’t even…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYS9fLucyt8[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rF5y0Ejk10Q[/youtube]

Great video, has the same message as the OP, and points out the same things I pointed out in one of my first posts here.

If liberals are gonna call us racist whenever we take a position that is slightly right to theirs, then we might as well accept being called racists and go all the way being racist.

That’s the weakness of disingenuous liberalism. It removes all incentives for right-wingers to moderate themselves, since they will be equated with the extreme and called “racist”, “nazi”, “white supremacist” anyway.

This is true, either your their kind of extreme or your a terrorist.