Fake Rape Allegations Destroying Football Team

cnn.com/2016/12/16/us/minnes … index.html

This is how absurd liberalism has gotten. I’m not backing the idea of a gangbang, but that is literally what happened, a college girl was seen on tape, freely engaging in consensual sex, cops have seen the video and refuse to press the situation further, but because of some knee jerk liberal rules, 10 players have been suspended for having consensual sex with her, sex I emphasize, was caught on tape and reviewed by cops.

The woman afterwards talked to her mother and went to a hospital, got a restraining order of several of the football players, banning them from the stadium (99% a cheerleader).

Again… NO CHARGES. NO DUE PROCESS. NO INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, just one big fuck you to a whole football team because one woman had second thoughts on being a whore.

University suspended 10 players indeginately, so now the entire team is refusing to play until everyone is reinstated.

Everyone is punished in mass, and by default men are guilty until proven innocent, all because of some wackjob liberal presumption that goes 180° against the rest of our legal system.

Yes, there are a lot of rapes, but also a lot of false claims too. I was subject to one, to a white girl I still don’t know, accused me of impregnating her, had a black baby with a different blood type (I’m white). It really wrecked my life. These psychopaths are allowed to run around, wrecking havoc unchecked, the shit poor excuse given to me by feminists in the past was there were so very few cases of fake rape compared to actual rape, thus is in a effort to make it safer…

First off, legally that arguement is pure and absolute shit, two very different crimes. One is a case of man, actual rapists, taking women, and the other is of a very different kind, of men being accused of rape with absolutely no proof, oftentimes innocent. In a legal system of innocent until proven guilty, severe stress needs to be put on UNTIL. Everyone on the left is in a knee jerk position to reach out and punish everyone, without following the rules they expect themselves to be treated by.

If this girl has failed to convince the police department wrong has taken place, she shouldn’t even be entitled to a restraining order. Consensual sex is not grounds for protection, and logically, if she is working where they work, especially in a support role to them, she should never ever of been allowed to file a restraining order that bans others, not convicted of any crime, from their jobs or school.

Imagine if you just shared a few classes with someone, and out of the blue you has restraining orders slapped on you, completely clueless, your now legally banned from going to class. Or say it is your job, or the only super market in town. That can really fuck your life up, and it is deeply selfish of the individual doing it. In cases where you can show proof neither rape no coersion has happened, the restraining order should be dropped, or better, reversed, keeping her away from them, not them from her. They aren’t the ones who fucked up in concocting a fake rape story after all, she did, the onus of punishment should fall squarely on her, for her actions.

Again, this is NOT a raoe thread, I don’t want to hear stories about past rapes and the need for something to be done, this is about a Fake Rape case, one cops refuse to prosecute for, where mass punishment has been dispensed anyway, and the only recourse for justice is over 100 guys refusing to play anymore. It should never of gotten to this point, the rules to do this should never of been put in place period, if you commit a rape, you can’t play because your in jail. This is a false parallel legal system that simply should exist. I agree more needs to be done to stop rape, the most obvious solutions are deeply politically correct (don’t be a fucking party slut for starters), like don’t ptlut yourself in situations where you get raped in the first place. Don’t walk around in revealing clothing alone in dark parks at night, don’t hang out late at bars with nothing but men then leave late at night alone, don’t hang out with just guts, etc. I would be crucified on many forums for stating the obvious there, that women have the right to dress however they want, blah blah blah, etc. Do you know how I have avoided becoming a victim of gang violence? By not dressing in gang colors, by not hanging out with gang members, by not doing drugs, by not selling drugs, by avoiding gang neighborhoods at night, by refusing to have anything to do with that damn situation.

Can I still be killed? Yep, I can be laying in bed, and get shot by a stray bullet. But you know what, my strategy seems to of kept me alive so far, and ummm… news has a lot of guys dying on it, so I’m sticking with it, think if every guy embraces it, be far less crime and death.

Likewise with rape. If I got shot, and woke up from a year long coma, and discovered they decided to crack down on crime like this, by employers mass firing “suspected gang members” just because they happened to be wearing the wrong colors, wrong place, wrong time, banned from going to places they have to go to to make a living and be normal, free Americans I would freak the fuck out. You can’t launch a pogrom against one sector of society to “protect” the other, you not only don’t stop the crime in question, but punish far more innocent people who don’t deserve to be treated as shit. You find your solutions elsewhere, within the scope and ethics of the law.

At the very least, if your going to have such horrible, threatening rules that can ruin the lives of menwho have done no wrong, least you can do is punish women who rape-bait by running around being the campus whore. It is “equal”, “fair” that way. All they guys are ruined for fake rape and no recourse to due process, and all the whores are equally ruined. Watch the STD levels plummet as both men and women are scarred to leave their rooms, in fear of being unfairly targeted by a liberal policy that can ruin their lives.

Ahhh perhaps you don’t get it yet…doesn’t matter if it was caught on tape, doesn’t matter if it was consensual…if she decides that it is rape…then it is rape…yeah welcome to the new world where women’s feelings are worshipped.

Protect yourself fellas…oh and a merry xmas

I can think of only 2 reasons as to why a woman would intentionally make false rape accusations:

  1. Money
  2. Revenge

I don’t think women do it just because they can do it and get away with it, as in some kind of unjustified power trip. Also, consent is a tricky kind of area. As you know, alcohol is number one date rape drug, and when a woman is drunk, can she really give consent?

Yes, I’m fairly certain that’s how a very sizeable chunk of people are concieved in fact, is while drunk.

Note I don’t drink period, and have refused sex in the past because I find it a massive turnoff, but you gotta be really out of it… Like, you got a serious issue, if Budweiser is gonna be considered your date rape drug. If I had a highly valued sex vagina, and wanted to avoid sex, I would try to avoid publically intoxicating myself to the point of passing out in front of a bunch of guys. Same goes for a desire not to be eater alive by wild animals in the Savannah, best to stick to the safari vehicle and leave the drinking for later, don’t go hiking out alone in to the bush with a crate of whiskey, hoping the lions are liberal and understanding. They didn’t vote for Hillary, I assure you. Hyenas don’t wear white pants.

You said the girl talked to her mother. Translation: The girl was hurting the next day and having discharges of a certain odor, mom questioned and daughter lied through her teeth. Scum.

No, I’m not talking about a couple of beers, I’m talking about serious liquor mixing, it looks innocent enough (unnoticed by critical awareness, like a slight of hand) but that stuff hits you out of the blue like a ton of bricks. So, a girl may have intentioned only to have a couple of beers and the next thing she knows, she’s being offered, in an innocent, friendly manner, of course, a smorgasbord of liquor beverages, slowly, one by one. Oh, try this, you’ll like it! And by this time she’s offered, she’s already buzzed and her thinking is muddled, and everyone is drinking. (I remember the first time I tried long island iced tea, I felt like it took me 20 minutes just to walk from my table to the restroom. And the girl who was drinking with me drank like 3 or 4 of them, though she paid for it the next day). And yes, I agree she shouldn’t be doing it, but this is not always so clear cut. Drinking is part of the culture, unfortunately. It’s part of forming friendships. And peer pressure and peer bonding is also a powerful force for many young people. Having been in the military, you should understand this. What this really points to is that a woman cannot trust to drink with man, even if he is not intending to get her drunk and take advantage of her. But like I said, peer bonding over drinks is culturally encouraged and often practiced, as a social ritual. And the young people are the most susceptible to this.


Do you think these women are asking to be raped?

A lot of women have mental health issues and do these things for attention.

They also regret certain things they have done then lie, often convincing themselves enough to contact the authorities.

Emotions…

Let’s square this “culture” with it’s history. During the middle ages, when our pub as well as aristocratic drinking culture took off (not to say people weren’t boozehounds before, but I’m talking the rise of population leading yo permanent drinking hubs once again) women putting liquor to their lips was more or less considered just that, the ultimate vice against feminity. We got loads of art and writings on the subject. It was more or less a signal this woman is a fluzzie, ready to be tapped, in or out of marriage, the exact opposite of Lucretia sitting at home knitting, literally not asking for it, but getting raped anyway.

At what point did this “culture” you speak of stop being that? Did they do a reset in the 1700s and every 20 something year old man in every pub suddenly agree they we’re not on the prowl for pussy, bar Maud wasn’t a object if srxual leering, that it was wrong for groups of guys to try to climb into women’s pants? Everyone just agreed to a social reset?

No. The reason why guys are liqouring you up is because they want you. Nobody goes up to a smelly hobo and by him some liqour because they just appreciate them for who they are. If a woman comes up to me, offering to by my food at a restaurant, sitting down with me, chatting me up, I know she is either a very mistaken spy, or is after my cockaroo. I’m not gonna make an excuse of culture to wiggle out of not knowing. Doesn’t mean she has a right to it even then, but I know if I’m eating this shit, dick is gonna be expected eventually if we keep meeting like this. I’ll have to put out, it ain’t for charity. Those girls just having “fun” are playing the sane damn game the last 50 generations of their ancestors played.

Not emotions, hormones screwing up the brain and emotions. And it is not just girls.

I literally don’t drink, so can only go off observation. I know my mother was a bar whore, and many of my siblings are a result of said activities, almost certainly myself. I never saw anything good in it. Only bars I even step into is the very, very rare strip club, and they force me to buy liqour, liqour the smelly strippers usually drink up for me. I’ve seen mixed bars/steakhouses, I remember as a kid a place called Silver Dollar Steakhouse out in California- was a actual restaurant in the back, bar up front, a woman can be excused if she thought it was just a restaurant for constantly being approached, but not if she starts accepting into the very familiar rhythms of courtship. Our entire culture is full of these stupid images, reason why it is “fun” is because most people are predisposed to situations positively and pleasurably that results in baby making, and sex is all too often a obvious effect of spending all your R&R at a bar.

If your a exchange student from a Islamic country with neither bars nor liqour, and you have no idea that the stuff guys are buying you is NOT actually just harmless catpiss (no idea how you guys drink that smelly shit), someone really needs to pull that girl aside and explain to them how shit actually works, in a very politically incorrect way, so she may run out of that place in a frantic hurry back to her dorm, so she can order a chastity belt off of Ebay.

If your looking for fun, and only fun, play games online. Hard to have sex online.

So there were 10 or so men and only 1 woman? Not sure how a straight man could keep an erection with other naked men around and knowing they just fucked the same woman he’s supposed to fuck. It all sounds very homoerotic. It’s disgusting to even think of penetrating an orifice another male’s penis penetrated just seconds ago. You must be at least a bit of a faggot for that.

Look, social drinking is not always about sex; sometimes it’s just about having a good time. Through the centuries, whole families, villages gathered together in various celebrations and men and women ate, drank and danced and it was not in order to get laid. Sometimes, people just want to have a good time, and that’s it. My point is that a woman may drink with an intention of just having a good time, not for the purpose of getting laid, so I’m just saying that I can see how a misunderstanding could happen on both sides, leading to a rape charge.

Yes, there are women like these, but not ‘a lot of them’ as you claim. These women usually have a troubled past, or are trying to escape it.
I have known a few of them.

,

.

That’s a lie, and you know it. The police use to put the so called rape victims in hotels/care homes to aid them out of empathy, sympathizing with their circumstances …There happened to be soo many false rape allegations from women who were “troubled” as you say, that the police stopped doing it, not only that but now they look at the women with suspicion and interrogate them heavily…

You just seem like somebody who acknowledges what Im saying but will always deny the severe reality of it in order to cast this illusion of innocence on most womne, then indirectly implying that i hold hostility towards all women and that i’m grossly generalizing, or im paranoid, gay or a weak hurt man…or whatever else to redirect attention…whether you do it consciously or actually genuinely believe that it isn’t that significant to be concerned about… Personally i think you’re the latter and in denial about it…

That’s how we passed the last ice age. There was no television in those caves.

All the lands north of Rome, be it Celt or Hun, allowed wife lead marriages. If your white, the nastier of your ancestors had marriages very different from the Stoic Emphasis from Augustus on for having legal monogamy.

Is it nasty? Positively, that’s what a lot of wife sharing porn focuses on. It’s one of the reproductive modes, like hatems or monogamy, that we are as a species well primed for. Some of the sillier constructs of polyamory networks are of course chaotic and in sustainable, but I assure you, a embarrassingly large amount of all our ancestors fucked just like in the manner you can’t imagine, and worst. We should also note your do called inability to admire to imagining, or not being able to at all, is likewise most likely two sets of traits for dealing with a perverse sexual social structuring. Your less likely to get STDs and keep a balanced household if you don’t do these orgies, but in societies with no marriage laws preventing incest and with emphasis of property inheritance through marriage pacts, these orgies are a unsightly necessity at times to introduce new genes into the bloodline. Look at the Amish, or European nobility- they carry a lot of nasty mutations by bring too strict in marriage and being too monogamous. I don’t think Petronius in his Satyricon was merely mocking monogamy when he flipped the Republican ideals, making a lowly Roman servant girl refuse any sexual paramour unless he be a Roman night, while her Roman Lady was a whore for anyone. That’s part of the nasty side effects of having aristocracies and monogamous marriages, if it us a small gene pool to begin with, it quickly must arise either anyone can doodle freely in the marriage, any slave can fuck the head master’s wife with his approval and applause, or they turn into ugly, decrepit looking people.

With large genepools, and little class obsfucation in bringing in new blood, this goes away. I would recommend looking into Marco Polo’s travels, he wrote extensively on this subject, and likely introduced a number of STDs into Europe upon his return.

Not saying your wrong to be disgusted and appauled, but know that emotion can be quite easily eroticized, and turned into a kink easily. It is literally built into us all, no alpha or beta theorizing, master slave, etc undermines this, we can swing in all those directions with the right situation presenting itself to us. We are literally all bred for it. I don’t think it means your gay, your only gay if your attracted to the men, and try to sex the men in the absence of a female, but gangbangs have always been around, and I don’t think they are going to die off anytime soon. If we colonize Mars, we will have Martian gangbangs. If we go to Uranus, someone is gonna try to bang Ur Anus. A big chunk of our population reproduces like this, and their descendants find their way in a generation or two into better ang better families. I don’t approve because the end result is some table slut demanding universal socialism because she keeps getting knocked up, or wrorst, abortions because she can’t control herself… Leads to childhood poverty and neglect, single mothers can’t easily provide father figures to kids, and yes- that is very important, the kids succeed less financially as they get older and have less of a social network to rebound on it they loose their jobs or have a illness, but quite frankly, if the Catholic Church was powerless to stop drunken sluts from fucking all over during the middle ages to the reformation, how on earth do you think we can stop it today? They controlled how hold morals, couldn’t pull it off. It isn’t gonna stop, so fuck it, it’s gonna happen. You can call five guys about to bang a pussy they are factors, but they note they get to bang a pussy, while your at that moment are not, and the find it unbelievably exciting. You have better luck wrestling a meaty bone from a starving dog, shaming either the men nor the women stops all occurances. Like to imagine it stops many, but it won’t stop even half, just push it underground, and the shame will cause people to break out the whips and leather face masks and punish one another, because they are endlessly inventive when they are shamed and repressed. They did that in my town when I was in Iraq, I returned, and a bunch of elderly women were talking about a BDSM parlour (British spelling to emphasize the depravity) opened up on our towns golf course’s country club, was naturally shut down by the police. Very little evidence of it remains:

wvrecord.com/stories/510592461-j … on-mansion

Their website was taken down had stupid Sauwelios shit explaining the history of punishments, what each paddle does, etc. Sort of shit Emperor Tiberius did to his guests on Capri (supposedly).

Issue us, thus is a small town in West Virginia, and a significant chunk of our landed population are heavily intermarried. It is sorta aristocratic as a result, even our immigrant families that made it big are 3rd,4th generation local, marrying locals of the same class. This is almost certainly less of a Nietzschean-Satanic revolt against Christianity, exploring the Dionysian higher consciousness blah blah blah, then just desperately needing a outlet to new mates that don’t eerily look too fucking similar to themselves. All that other shit is just a excuse to explain away the need to keep health genes in a stressed circumstance they can’t grasp or comprehend. That, or their job is just the fucking worst ever, and need tortured like a Russian being beaten with branches in a ateamroom, just to relieve neurological pressure. Such people find relief fighting bears.

A lot of the bizarre shit we do stems from fairly simple situations when we look back at history and see what similar societies practiced similar. Our modern era is rather stupid and full of shit for not being aware of these things. If your population is large enough, the best relations are monogamous in actuality and in time loving, leads to the best society. If it isn’t the case, usually a unspecified imbalance elsewhere can be found. It is very rare someone has come up with a new sexual idea nobody has never before figured out, and by default, truly gay people don’t reproduce often. We are dealing with the wide, wide world of seemingly bizarre heterosexual fetishes, not really gay at all, because all gay means is they won’t fuck the opposite sex.

If you find you gotta strangle a chicken to orgasm while having sex, your not gay, you just need counseling, strongly recommend it.

I think a rape allegation deserves to be investigated, your innocent till proven guilty, but not so innocent that the police aren’t going to investigate you. Unless you have a ironclad alibi, expect a little poking around by the police. They have a responsibility to look into it. Methods to aid this investigation is where emphasis needs to be focused on, not putting the nuts of all men in a vice because women fear rape, therefore all men are guilty approach.

They fucked during medieval festivals. Why do you think we have the prom in the late spring? So babies, like little critters, are born three months earlier,in early spring.We got bunnies popping out all over on easter,celebrating a mans death. Clearly we are shoeing all that “fun”.

Just about anything that is “fun” is sexually exploited by both men and women, the only reason why we have a drinking culture where women get dolled up and hammered, or ot is exploited economically, like gambling. I dont gamble,I have visited riverbiat casinos in Indiana, just to see what fun everyone was talking about. Was pointless games of chance,either against a human deaker who tended to win over the long term, or fucking conditioned respobse lab levers, you pull,and it whirls and whistles,and hopes build up youll win big.

It is the worst form of entertainment Ive ever came across. I dont drink, have no money, and don’t find the process of being manipulated for the very little I have fun at all. If I’m gonna blow a shitload of money on something with no return for me personally, I will go out and give charity. At least I know it went to someone who really needs it. Fuck the fun culture where everyone is out to get you.

I do not doubt that sexual degeneracy existed before, but it was typically a sign of decadence, of a group’s decline.

If everybody fucks everybody there is no reason for men to invest in offspring, since they don’t know which woman, if any, has theirs. And a group where males have no investment in the system is weakened and possibly even threatened by these males. Not to mention how comparably weak it is to another group with healthier relationship practices between males and females, all other factors equal.

As for cuckold men and promiscuous women, it is healthiest for the group to just kill them to send a message to all other degenerates.

Boogerman thinks that everything that survives is good. Making yourself stupider and weaker in order to survive is an OK as far as he is concerned. Whatever does the job. There are no standards other than those of the present moment – fashion, trends, fads, popularity, whims, etc.

And Boogerman is who?

Turd Ferguson.