That’s your problem, if you can’t lock on.
I can’t dumb it down any further.
I will repeat using different words, hopefully it clicks.
In the US, CIA doesn’t have free reign to investigate anything it cares to investigate. It can take tips and leads, but has to seek permission from the chain of command.
Areas CIA is not responsible for:
Cyber Warfare- that is the US Military’s job, we have Cyber command units working close with the NSA
NSA- it does investigations on network spying, both internal pentration and external. If your getting prosecuted as a American, it’s most likely by the douchecocks at the NSA.
DIA- it does collect massive amounts of information of military related material, sometimes it comes across muscellanious other. It can’t prosecute outside of a military court, but can snatch and grab you.
CID- Military version of FBI, I don’t believe it can investigate civilians, but maybe it can, the precedent for this is hazy, but I know it won’t investigate outside of a military scope.
FBI- from IRS founding to Nixon, overstepped every damn restraint on power we had. I did complain bitterly when the FBI let Hillary go, then hitched about her being a incompetent little shit, wasn’t it’s job to add negative commentary in regards to why it isn’t pressing charged. It is purely a federal level police force.
CIA, it collects all that fuckinh info, and investigates overseas, and will snatch and grab for the president, informs Congress on intelligence issues, will run block ops if we so deem it necessary, etc. It doesn’t have a free hand to do anything, if we had a James Bond in the US Government t, he would work for the CIA. James Bond wouldn’t be allowed to just decide his own missions and do whatever he damn well pleases though.
Powers that can order these institutions.
- federal government can order them, be it under the executive or legislature. For the CID and hypothetically DIA, state governments can for national guards if they for whatever bizarre reason need info. I’m not aware of that ever happening, but that’s a consequence of having state administered national guards. I think governors are in the loop too, as head of the national guard, plus I just see them around my state Capitol.
Ethically, Obama can’t investigate himself or his cabinet. He wisely sat out the Hillary issue, stared at Comely helplessly. Thus is how it should be, cause it us obvious as fuck Obama has bias. Deep down inside I dint think he cares about Hillary, but umm… you gotta stay clear, cause the classic rule is, if you just look like you have a conflict if interests but don’t, you still have a conflict of interest. Period.
Should the FBI of investigated Hillary? Yes, but it has laws to in force, it’s mandate comes from investigating laws, doesn’t need to be asked.
CIA does not operate on this basis. It has a lot of limitations and prohibitions on it’s conduct, but few areas it is specified it has a automatic, reflexive mandate to look into.
This is my issue. It has absolutely no mandate to interfere in a presidential election, at all. The issue of wikileaks and DNC hacking, we gotta take exclusively from Obama. Would it be the CIA, Cyber Command, or NSA who investigated, was it a joint investigation? NSA “may” have some mandate here, Cybercommand certainly dies, CIA… ummmm. Who is directing the CIA?
President can’t ethically give these directives. Members of Congress and congressional oversight can, Obama can call those congressmen back in session to sit through committees if need be.
If not, then the CIA is meddling.
Further, it doesn’t matter if wikileaks or Russia, ghost of hitler, aliens from Mars, etc hacked. My position on wikileaks is Assange should be killed for the Arab Spring, I’m not in his fan club. First amendment and lack of a State Secrets Clause restricting top secret info means it is still open and free to access, Hillary did make the claim repeatedly during the widely watched Presidential Debates. Everyone was educated on the questionable source of this info. As far as I know, it wasn’t Russia hacking eikileajs, but rather Russia supposedly hacking the DNC, and delivering that data to wikileaks. Wikileaks then gave it out. Currently under US law, and the US constitution, nothing wrong happened POST RELEASE, it just becomes data like any other information, all information manipulates information. This be no different than a Hillary Aide breaking ranks and mass releasing data online. She can be prosecuted, but you don’t get a election do over cause it us unfair everyone knows your party is a bunch of little shits. That’s why we have a first amendment. Recommend investing in better encryption next time, and not to pool everything in one database.
So, why is the CIA still playing these games, and why is the liberal media still walking in lock step together like they are bring directed to do so, by the President, like they were the entire election? We found they were all involved in a massive fraud, made it appear Hillary was going to win, dominate the election. Media was being directed then, it is now again.
Who is coordinating these leaks, what are they trying to do? This in not the CIA’s job, it would be FBI, NSA, maybe even FCC (apologize for not listing FCC above, they investigate abuse if air signals, and actively regulate in real time signal output of cell phone and radio towers).
Please don’t ask me to explain it more. Do I gotta give you a primer on the separation of powers too? Let me know.
Let me know when your on board, so we can continue with the op.