Anarchism is exactly what anarchists say it is - as long as it is workable - it is not.
Because… the trouble with it is that to achieve it you have to organise to overthrown that which is seeks to replace and then you have to keep power to stop the centralising reforming. The only way you can do that is with a central authority, and so anarchism is doomed to fail.
All barbarians were organised around centralising authorities. Their seats of power were the oppida, and when Rome attacked they chose a grand leader to combat the legions; Vercingetorix - a dictator.
Anarchy and self-rule (autonomy) are two different things. Anarchists have no autonomy. They have no internal locus of control. Their body has no centralized government (reason) but decentralized (instinct) which is why they are attracted to anarchy (decentralized social order.)
Maggie, just do one of your really long posts where you say everyone is undisciplined and that no one is noble. That’ll teach em.
There is always some sort of anarchy at some level. In the absence of globalism, or some world-dominating empire, there is external anarchy, between nations, since they are not organized. When there is no external anarchy, as in the case of globalism, there is internal anarchy, between constituent groups or people. For example, most families nowadays are anarchistic. Most people, in general, are anarchists in their minds and bodies.
Anarchies are uncontrolled, so whoever wants to live in a true anarchy can’t do anything but wait for the established order to collapse. I assume through some sort of civil war. Then, they will have to hope that their anarchy will last as long as possible before new order is established.
That strikes me as a very passive form of existence.
The more active anarchists will say “screw you real anarchy” and instead go for something like minimal government. How minimal, I don’t know, but the less minimal, the more stable their anarchy will be, though at the same time the less of an anarchy it will be.
The smartest thing would be to give up on anarchy altogether.
Hahaha is a true native american. Native americans didnt have government. But even they had rules.
All it is a gang a tribe. America is a large gang. its that simple.
Anarchy will not exist until the human mind evolves. All humans do is war, that’s all they do. Indians were taken over by the stuffy Brits. All humans are is a bunch of gangs and the biggest gang wins.
Like I said its either corporation or government. Noones gonna create a factory/road infrastructure unless there is a corpration or gvernment doing so.
Lets say you have anarchy, well you have to vote on where the roads should be built and how much everyone should donate to the road builders. And some guy or girl has to supervise the process. That’s government. That’s the type of government I advocate. Any more than that is excess, tyranny. When the law books are so bloated and the amount of laws exceed even the amount of laws of the bible, that is when i call it deliberate tyranny.
You see your own genitals as being tyrannical so . . .
Stop focusing on my genitals. Focus on the big picture. Female=love and beauty. I want more love and beauty in my life.
A doctor has to focus ob your problem even if that’s your genitals. That doesn’t make him gay. You are self-hating t(y)ranny. You consider tour own self, your genitals, to be tyrannical, so when you speak of what is tyranny in general you tend to be wrong.
There are many anarchist ideologies out there where each definition is different from one another. My understanding anarchism and individual (self) autonomy are identical.
It does not matter what you think it is but what it is.
A self-ruled(= regulated = controlled) man cannot be into decentralized social order. He can only lie he is into it.
Thought my genitals were tyrannical when I was younger, when I was a youngin I was taught feminist ideals and that men were evil, porn was evil, etc. Wanted to cut off my genitals to be free of the tyranny. I viewed the gun as good, the penis was evil.
Now, I view the gun as good, but the penis is not evil. I still have a deep desire to have a vag and be penetrated, but I want to be a futa and keep my penis. Removing my penis would be submitting to tyranny, submitting to feminism, submitting to the cuck agenda, something I cannot do.
I believe all men need a little homosexuality in their life, without it, men would hate each other too much. By homosexuality, I don’t mean anything dirty, just a slightly romantic admiration for other men. Without it, men would not ever feel kind towards other men.
If a man is too disgusted by penis he will chop it off.
I read that strange theory of yours. I disagree. There is no need for sexual feelings in order for a man to form a strong bond with another man.
Otto Weinerger discovered this in the 1900’s. He was a genius, a german genius and he commited at age 24 because people didn’t buy enough copies of his book to his liking.
I discovered it as well. There are rumors that you are a basement dweller who does not go outside much. I do not say this to insult. What I mean by this, is in order to gain this understanding, you have to be to the point where you have talked to thousands of people, and can see the human species as the organism it is.
Deep friendships have a sexual component, it is vital to their functioning. However you don’t see two dude soldiers going at it because, they are both attracted to the female form and disgusted by each other’s pheromones. But if they magically turned into girls they would go at like no tommorow. Male lions function in the same manner, but are not as repulsed by other males so male lion homosexuality is more frequent.
It’s very sad that you have to study people as if they were lab rats in order to understand human nature. You have yourself, your genes, to study, and yet, instead of tuning into your instincts in order to understand how human nature works you are studying others.
What can you possibly learn in this manner especially in the age of decadence? Nothing but perverted/distorted way of life.
All of which is understandable considering how much you hate yourself.
I do look inwards, I also look at history books and documentaries. Modern humans are just an extension of the stupid of past generations.
You are a tranny ffs. How can you be so bold so as to claim that you are looking inward when you are a goddamn tranny insisting that you have to interact with at least thousand of people in order to understand human nature? What’s next? You have to read at least 100 books? Prismatic style?
I am beyond the common tranny. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, I am 7th gender.
Anarchism is the direct opposite of permanence as in a permanent state [Although even the state is impermanent despite brandishing the illusion that it isn’t]. Anarchism is perpetual in that in order to exist for a long period of time it must re-perpetuate itself constantly into being. If it doesn’t re-perpetuate itself into existence it ceases to be. Is anarchy impermanent? Maybe, but it still can last a long time even in temporal transition. They say in order to challenge the state from exasperating or engulfing itself a perpetual revolution is needed every twenty five years for renewal of social or individual independence.
The roots of independence must constantly be renewed or otherwise central tyranny takes hold.
Even in the absence of anarchism the state destroying itself through corruption and its own excessive expansion naturally redirects towards anarchism existentially under its own collapse. There never has been any kind of centralized social order that lasts forever. It is a sort of cyclical equilibrium of centralization and decentralization always returning back. The destructive nature of the state always naturally leads back to anarchy. Anarchy is the spontaneous default existence of nature absent of social or human impositions. Existential entropy seems to favor anarchy along with chaos. Both entropy and chaos are absolutes of the universe where anarchism is always an inevitability. That’s what anarchism is, a kind of human existence that finds refuge within entropy or chaos.
The inevitability of anarchism is the inevitability of the collapse of all forms of social order or organization. Anarchism is the inevitable reality of social order’s lack of existential immortal longevity.