youtube.com/watch?v=K7jLeBWMA0U
That’s today?
Dammit, I’m late! Buy some dip at the gas station, gotta hurry. No time to wash clothes, will be stinky.
Second that emotion,
This video made me sad. It is sad that Americans didn’t kill all the redskinned shitheads, cause now they have to listen to cows like those on the video, and also traitorous liberal cows like Pandora.
If you have an opportunity to kill and exterminate the enemy, do it. If you can enslave them, do it. But whatever you do, you don’t first conquer an enemy and take their lands and/or enslave them, then set them free.
The enemy will gather their strength back, and they will be vengeful because you have dominated and humiliated them in the past. If permitted to live in your society, they will start to tear it apart from within, demanding ever greater rights and even compensations.
And if your past enemy is now treated as an equal within the moral framework of your new, modern system, then traitorous people within your own kind will start to align with the enemy, since in relation to the current morality of equality, the past conquests, killings, enslavements, etc. are unjustified, meaning that those who buy wholly into the premises of modern liberalism are, indeed, right. But again, right only in relation to false modern liberal premises of equality.
When all this happens, you have modern America - a bunch of minorities outbreeding and replacing the currently (questionably for how long) dominant white population.
Lesson learned - if you have an enemy, like redskins, kill them if an opportunity presents itself. Otherwise, they will come back stronger. Likewise, if you have ever enslaved anybody, like niggers, kill them if you no longer want to keep slaves. Otherwise, they will come back stronger. What you DON’T want to do is set your enemies free, and the LAST thing you want to do is to set them free within your OWN system. Then, they become part of the ingroup, and while societies tolerate violence towards the outgroup, it is immoral to be violent against somebody from the ingroup.
So now you have an enemy that:
- wants to get back to you
- is within your own system
- you cannot retaliate against them because they are part of the in group
- they may argue to have grounds to retaliate against you, since you have done violence to them, and under the new rules which make them part of the ingroup, they would be right
Happy thanksgiving, Americans! My recommended way of commemorating it would be to genocide all the redskins, then rename thanksgiving to ‘nofucksgiven’. But you’re too cucked for that. So keep getting destroyed from the inside.
Wait till you see his Happy Hanakkah and Kwanzaa speeches, always heart felt and inspiring, makes you feel the world is really coming together as one when he speaks, with great hope for the future. Always the Optimist.
One of the comments on the video, I can honestly say I Lol’d irl at the bolded part
EDIT: Fuck liberal strategy of shaming, trying to turn proper, far-right conservatives into these pathetic castrated cuckolds like Turd here. No apologies, no regrets.
The cuckservative only conserves (cuckserves?) the liberalism of the past generation of liberalism. Fuck it.
Who’s forcing you to listen to me? If you prefer to listen to your kind howling in pain go to Stormdrain of whining site and soak up all the negativity. You won’t accomplish anything because you’re still reactionary. The subconscious mind does not understand negatives, so what you’re accomplishing and what is incidentally your end goal is more hate fueled by self victimization, not actual change. You do not even step outside the box because you do not see it. You’re a victim seething with ideas of hate and revenge, and that makes you just like those girls.
You too, AutSider. You too.
Don’t take the ranting of any man weighing under 70 kg seriously Pandora. He is just upset life cheated him in the size department, it is why he never posted a pic of himself.
The Stormsomething forum? I don’t visit that, but now that you mention it, I really should take a look. I’ve known of it for months, but have never read it so far.
I’m not an American. What happens in America slightly influences my part of the world too, but it’s only to a small extent so mostly I don’t give a shit. My intent by writing things here is to spread awareness and make White Americans aware of how others try to cuck and manipulate them into submission. It’s interesting to observe from an outsider perspective how the process of subversion unfolds so predictably. Both, for the sake of curiosity, and to learn about it to prevent such a thing happening where I live.
I can’t solve the problems of white Americans for them, I provide them with what I consider to be an accurate description of the situation, it is up to them to do what they want with it.
What is this box that I do not see? Is it mystical, magical, only accessible to you… something like God, perhaps?
And what do you mean by that?
The emphasis should be on European accomplishments (identity) not on how Europeans are being victimized; this is a better bottom up approach. When you keep focusing on how Europeans are being victimized, this is the message you end up delivering, even if unawares, that they are a victim and you’re automatically putting them in a defensive, lower position. This is what I meant by subconscious not understanding negation: If you say, “Don’t Smoke”, only ‘Smoke’ registers in the subconscious, because the subconscious does not have a concept of ‘don’t’. Look into hypnosis techniques (how subconscious receives messages) and see how it relates to propaganda.
Also remember that America was founded to be the land of immigrants.
You’re not seeing the effect of your reactionary style on the subconscious and how it seeps into self identity. Some dumbass posts a racially provoking poster for a passersby to see. The one who feels damaged (because of his own shaky foundation) will throw a fit, and another (whose sense of identity does not get damaged) will laugh it off and walk by. If you react to every provocation that just shows you have a shaky foundation; and by propagating this reactivity you only end up shaking it up even more (you need to look at the overall message that is being imprinted). Positive propaganda is more effective than negative because of the way subconscious registers input, so you’d need to be concentrating on building up process because that’s what I see is really happening in the subconscious.
Whites cuck themselves. The very process of Whitening is anti-nature, pro cuck-ism.
Its like, nuns are white, cuckers are white. Native American’s are pagans, nature.
We were talking about Americans, and I recognized their accomplishments (dominating natives), failings (not dominating natives harsher), and the potential threats to the current superiority of white Americans (rising birthrates of minorities in relation to whites). Is pointing out potential threats victimization? No, not the way I see it. Victimisation is when one presents oneself to be in an inferior position (in which they may or may not really be) in order to acquire compensation from somebody. It is when leftie faggots and especially females cry oppression and demand compensation. Did I say that white people should try to present themselves as victims to redskins and demand compensation from redskins?
The difference:
- I am not claiming the minorities in America are in a superior position YET, I am pointing this out as a potential threat in the future if current trends continue
- I am not requesting compensation from minorities, I am (or would be, if I was an American) requesting that they fuck off or die, or at the very least, to keep their mouths shut.
Victimizations is feminine. It is how females acquire access to masculine power, by playing the poor, crying damsel in distress. What I am doing is identifying threats within nature and suggesting methods of dealing with them. This is masculine, this is what men have evolved to do.
As for your ‘smoke no smoke’ I never thought like that. I evaluate costs and benefits. If I smoked then I would stink, increase my chances of getting a disease like lung cancer, worsen my general health and waste money and time, and the benefits: none. Ok, perhaps social acceptance by other smokes, but that is potentially outweighed by social acceptance by nonsmokers, and besides, why would I want social acceptance from a group of retards who make inferior choices in the first place? The choice is clear. If somebody tells me that I should or should not smoke, who gives a shit. Unless they can point out some benefits for me, they can go fuck themselves.
I disagree with mindless contrarianism (which is what your smokenosmoke example hinges on) and just doing the opposite of what one is told to do, or what is popular. I consider it to be childishly rebellious. It means you are still defined by the basic premises of the other, you just invert them. Reminds me of hipsters and theistic satanism.
So? Of course I would want my group to immigrate and conquer new lands. And of course I wouldn’t like foreign groups to immigrate into my lands and conquer my lands. I’m not saying that anybody has any magical rights to anything. All rights are ultimately enforced physically, by force. If white Americans let themselves be outnumbered and outarmed by others, then according to natural selection, they deserve to die out as punishment for their degeneracy.
If you want to weaken a nation it would be useful to indoctrinate them into thinking that there is nothing wrong with them being replaced by people from another nation. If you do that, you might not even have to fight a war. You just slowly outbreed them. youtube.com/watch?v=_4F-bv9zTpo
The old dyke may not be aware of what they are doing, but they are definitely useful to a conquering enemy, aren’t they?
What you are doing, memetic war/indoctrinating the other with bullshit, is also part of war. Since America is founded by European immigrants, then Americans should accept immigrants too, right? Then if you get white Americans to accept that bullshit, you can conquer them with no physical resistance. Insert spics and niggers, and why not, redskins too. Have them breed like rabbits and let whites pay for it through welfare. That’s your ideal society, isn’t it?
The reason I post provocative (extreme) stuff is that by doing so I am pushing more moderate right-wing ideas into overton window. After hearing “genocide all niggers and redskins”, suddenly simple separation doesn’t seem so bad, no? And besides, since this is the internets I can speak my mind honestly and say what I think is truth with virtually no social repercussions except possibly ruining my reputation on an internet forum in the eyes of liberals and cucks, whom I don’t give a shit about anyway.
So what if the racially provoking poster is a warning to whites that their birthrates are falling while the birthrates of others are rising? You don’t think that’s a reason for concern? The way you’d make it out to be is that the person concerned for their race is “throwing a fit” (implying they’re just being emotional, having a tantrum without a reason), and their foundations are shaky (again, implying they have no real reason to do what they’re doing).
Positive and negative propaganda together are most effective. Besides, positive propaganda, such as emphasizing accomplishments your own race, is also necessarily negative propaganda in a sense, since we emphasize these accomplishments in relation to other races, thus implying that we are superior in that sense to other races. When we say we invented X, we’re also saying, it wasn’t the Chinese, or Africans, or anybody else, but US, who invented X. Anybody with half a brain understands that, which is why even positive propaganda, like “white pride”, causes so much hatred from the left.
Thanksgiving?
That’s so yesterday.
Happy Black Friday, America!!
youtu.be/pBkGla-sYis
kfor.com/2016/11/25/black-friday … he-nation/
American Money didn’t exist with the Natives, America should have left well enough alone and the Natives would just be doing their thing. Had no need for American money, so if American never invaded in the first place they would even have to pay Native’s welfare.
Whites invented cucking in the first place. Blacks have no concept of it, its just like, boom, their done, cavemen psychology, sex isn’t even special to blacks, more like just a run-of-the-mill day. Whites are anti-nature.
It’s like, Darth Vader is white, Darth Vader hates sandpeople, because sandpeople suck. Just because sandpeople suck doesn’t mean Darth Vader is good. The Empire is sterile as shit, a bunch of nuns and white dudes, ran by the pope.
Its like, this isn’t the dark ages, “Let none survive” and “massacre all in the land” isn’t enlightened ideals, and just because you have enlightened ideals doesn’t make you a cuck. This isn’t like a trogdor tank steamroll society, people are not brutal death-machines of pillaging and destruction and burninating all who oppose them. Even by Clingon standards you are pushing it. You’ve far surpassed pagan/clingon standards, and are now in Borg/Romulan territory. Even lions don’t trogdor all who oppose them. You are litterally more savage than a lion.
The reason Whites expanded their territory is the same reason they feared - they feared the Britons would invade their territory. Its like, humans cannot just stick to their own piece of land, they have this inherent instinct to steal other people’s land. It’s an endless saga of territory quest, can’t we all just get along? You really want to reincarnate into this shit over and over with endless war and blight? Ancient war isn’t even good, 80% of them died of cold, not even got to feel the glory of battle. My advice, stick to dueling.
It’s like, Chimp psychology is this inherent instinct to invade and steal other land, and here you are arguing White supremacy, saying Whites should act like total chimps, and have stole and murdered the natives better than they already did, when you probably have used the same argument to demonize the blacks, saying blacks are inferior because they steal and murder. All politicians have agendas that cannot be trusted. I place a vote of no confidence in all politicians.
So you are saying that when people say “Don’t be racist, don’t be sexist.” They are making people think and behave in a more sexist and racist way?
One thing it does is make people think that they are racist and sexist because why else would somebody scold them about it. That’s if we assume they are socially trusting people.
Of course, first it must be established that being sexist and racist is something morally bad, otherwise it would be a reaction of “Oh, you think so? Haven’t thought about it that way. I guess you are right in some ways. 
”
Or if we tell people not to be Nazis then they subconsciously want to become Nazis.
Actually not. But they might feel a vague guilt about it because even if it were true that the ‘subconscious’ does not understand a ‘negation’ the Nazi image still has associated negative connotations.
Connotations, negative stereotypes, which are present because of a biased indoctrination way of education.
Like the stereotype that Europeans have some kind of responsibility towards minorities and so on.
Modern society still has a long way to go, to get rid of all those stereotypes.
I guess you are saying that the anti-Nazi propaganda didn’t work because of not understanding the word ’No’. Probably explains the black supremacist movements which have sprung up.
Let’s face it, all that reactionary anti-Nazi education achieved nothing. All the deconstruction of European identity achieved nothing, didn’t change anything, didn’t affect birthrates, didn’t affect policies in favour of immigration of muds. It did nothing…
We can only hope that anti-Americans take it to heart and quit being reactionary, quit being so shitlibby. It just has no effects.
In fact why get worked up about anything, why get out of bed except to enjoy floating down the stream.
You’re bringing their awareness of topic of racism/sexism and so amplify its importance within general consciousness.
This is artificially created phenomenon. A person who does not think in these terms would not be offended because he doesn’t think along those lines. He thinks so because the concept itself was introduced and reinforced (though awareness) first, making him aware of it and teaching him to think along those lines.
You laugh, but in some places racialism is still accepted as natural, without any good or bad connotations attached to it, because the thinking process stems from I am I, and you are you. Whoever has the power or money will think of himself as superior, regardless of race, and other other will accept it, and his own race won’t play a crucial role in it. When Arabs enslaved Europeans, along with the other races, nobody complained that they were racist or Arab supremacist.
If you didn’t tell people about Nazism, they wouldn’t even think about it. And yes, if you tell people not to be Nazis, they just might become them, out of rebellion. Because the Nazi idea was presented to the subconscious as a possibility, as a choice.
See how you’re playing the blaming game and victimizing yourself? Who’s responsible? Who is claiming responsibility here?
I see it more as a zero sum game, because a large component is reactive, which makes it a dependent strategy, or playing a defensive position. Also, you’re still playing the same game, on pretty much the same level. What has changed? What happened to the innovation that was the pride and accomplishment of white man? The white man has been boxed, or put on rails, so he reacts and fights back in a very predictable way. He doesn’t invent new concepts, new tools. (Even Jews surpassed that).
You’re just riding the rails up and down at this point. Can you not come up with any other, better alternatives? Even corporations are more inventive, and they are driven only by profit.
This could be my last post for a while (getting a little busy), but I wanted to add a few thoughts to this topic. Isolationism worked because it freed the consciousness from externally imposed concepts. But with globalization and increasing interconnectedness, with technology, this is becoming increasingly difficult. But I still don’t like the idea of fighting fire with fire, this memetic war, this propaganda war because you’re still sucking people into the game, with externally predefined/ pre-set concepts, so they are still being reactionary. It’s like if someone decided to infect people with a virus, they would force them to use most of their energy resources to fight it off, the same energy they could have used to pursue their own interests and goals, and to get ahead. Instead, they’re stuck in a circular race just to survive. It’s like impregnating wars, an empty (free) womb (mind) is a thing that should not go to waste mentality, so everyone wants to fill it. I would rather not be sucked into the game at all, because the game is a set up no matter which side you take. In the long term, it’s lose-lose situation because you’re following the script. While coming back from being overseas I’ve always been amazed how American general population is so obsessed with Democrat vs. Republican dichotomy, this is how the general mind has been molded to think. Is there no life outside of this framework? It’s like being stuck on a tram, you can only go this way or that way.
What makes you think I’m laughing?
The places where racism and sexism is accepted as natural are growing and I am not surprised about it.
(Classic) Liberalism is a slow suicide cult. They want to disappear in other and they are literally disappearing. It’s called social progress.
Maybe you can shame those Arabs into not being racist nor sexist.
Bad news for you - you can’t.
That’s a false myth. The overwhelming majority of people are social conformists. At least White and Asian liberals and basic conservatives are very much social conformists. That whole “your kids are going to hate you and rebel against you if you don’t let them do what they want” shtick got propagated through the (((media))) and (((psychologists))) to make parents reluctant to oppose the social norms imposed through the mass media onto their children. Clever.
You have a hard time accepting negative judgements about something you think is good.
Me - “Guys, those tigers are dangerous, they ate Billy and Mary.”
You - “Don’t blame the tigers, take responsibility, blabla. So here is what you should do - Don’t think about it as something bad, just accept it. Be zen. Be zzzzzz”
Ate myself comatose.