The lunacy of love

I think it is a matter of cultural definitions being swayed to one side and thus distorting our perception of reality.

What you call hyper-masculine is simply a woman who is not intune with her feminine energies (chaos) energies.
It is the default state of a woman to be reserved. Masculine type dancing is reserved. Males are distinctly identified by their inherent resistance to transform into feminine energies (chaos) energies, and their inherent resistance to expose themselves (such as why all male clothing is the opposite of sexual.)

I think it has to do with being a single mom.

But something caused the desire in her to be a single mom, it is a woman with no need or attraction for a male so what was the cause behind it.

No, I think that when women are left on their own, either without a father, or without a husband, they try too hard to be strong and independent, then they become hyper-masculine.

I view it differently. I view as they are neutral and nobody ever activated their feminity (chaos energies).

Why would anyone have to activate their femininity? That should be their default state.

I understand where you are coming from, fetuses start out as females and children do not fully masculinize until puberty. I am as confused as you are, but this is the vibe I am getting, that reservation, similar to masculine non-dancing and masculine cloaking mechanisms, are the defaultstate.

Women have poor self-control, so when you give them freedom, the way we give them nowadays, they mess themselves up.

Tell me about it is’t like watching chickens walk around randomly. The first thing they want to do after they get out of rehab is buy a bunch of beauty products. And when you’re around them it’s like you can’t even think clearly due to the aura they provide it’s like they have this aura of total chaos and instability.

They are entirely different species.

I said that in second grade but I think males are the same species as females but their chaos patterns are just on a larger and slower scale, such as the media, politics, business etc.

Most manifestations of love are indeed types of lunacy, maybe a reflection of selfishness. Maybe not directly related to this topic, but indirectly very much so, the ultimate lunacy of solemn and “eternal” love as in marriage:
djedefsauron.net/index.php?o … Itemid=125

youtube.com/watch?v=zuuObGsB0No

Sometimes i think it would be pretty cool to own a motorhome and drive out into the countryside, where you can just chill and relax to the sound of rain while petting your dog.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8QrkFiTQVw[/youtube]

A more appropriate song for the subject:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuuObGsB0No[/youtube]

If you wish to understand the lunacy of love just delve into Egyptian history lol

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT62DBhIXFo[/youtube]

So you saying this song is about love? I’ll let you know I found this song in a record shop!

This is the most terrible bitch to ever sing into a microphone. You know how badly I hate to agree with you, or anyone for that matter. But man…you nailed it with this one. Have you heard her other song? “My name is no”? It’s even better.

I agree!
… down with such anti-hookup (“My name is no”), pro-marriage hags !

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EJ7ziHNT3M[/youtube]

I don’t believe love is a lunacy yet something more a perpetual constant. Something accepted and shared on both sides of the spectrum. Although love was a given. Even if it’s not understood.