Just different social groups using media stories etc. for their own cause at the expense of others… they make it all about them and the rest be damned.
She’s an embarrassment to her own people. Who thought it a good idea to let her talk with authority on the matter of what does and doesn’t make a hate crime.
She’s an embarrassment to her own people. Who thought it a good idea to let her talk with authority on the matter of what does and doesn’t make a hate crime.
Agreed.
Meet Natasha Marin: The woman behind REPARATIONS
Natasha Marin is a conceptual artist working across disciplines and media to collaborate with People to create opportunities for meaningful IRL and digital engagement.Reparations began as a social media experiment on Facebook on July 15, 2016.
What if you actually did something meaningful for someone before the end of the year?What if a stranger restored your belief in humanity, if only for a moment, by supporting you and allowing you to claim something you need in a material way?
I invite People of Color to ask for what we need to feel better, be happier, be more productive by posting in this space. These may be both material and immaterial requests.
I invite people who identify as White to offer services or contributions to People of Color in need of time, energy, substantive care, and support.
I don’t want to put limitations on this social experiment, but here’s how I imagine it might work:
POC 1: I need a massage. This week.
White Person 1: [posts Groupon with code for redemption]POC2: I need therapy. I can spend $10 a session.
White Person 2: [posts contact information to a therapist who they have made arrangements with.]POC 3: I need groceries.
White Person 3: “I’ll get them for you. PM me and I’ll send an Amazon Fresh or Safeway delivery. You just pick out what you want. I have a $200 limit.”POC 4: I’m too upset to make dinner. I live in Seattle.
White Person 4: “Come over to my house for dinner, bring a friend if you like. PM me and I’ll send you the address, or can I order delivery to you? What kind of food do you like?”POC 5: I need a quiet place to work on _________.
White Person 5: “I have an office, spare room, house, that will be unoccupied on the following dates, would you like to use that space? I can send pictures …”POC 6: I want to scream and cuss at someone.
White Person 6: “I volunteer as tribute. How do we set this up?”POC 7: I want to escape this cruel world in a Specific Videogame but can’t afford it on Steam right now. This is not a crisis, I just don’t trust people easily and want to see if this works.
White Person 7: Thank you for giving me the chance to do something concrete and relatively easy. I was quietly hating myself for doing nothing.
Racism is merely a cultural and racial mental platitude concerning identity where the word itself is nothing more than a negative connotation tied to established propaganda.
You have a group of utopian one worlders that are all accepting and encompassing towards everybody that wants to destroy traditional cultural mindsets not realizing the negative influence as a whole on diversification overtime left unbalanced. On the other opposing side you have cultural and racial traditionalists where culture or race are seen as real existential aspects to their everyday living.
This whole dichotomy of course is a consequence of globalism where globalists that form the current established power around the world want to see the more traditional and cultural isolationists annihilated completely hence why there is this prevailing theme of egalitarianism versus racism. Unfortunately very few can see through this interesting completely deceptive propaganda dynamic at work here.
What’s interesting is that both traditionalists and egalitarians see both of their opposing moral ideologies as being objective even in conflict with one another. Traditionalists see their racial and cultural outlook in terms of identity as being objective where anything contrary to it is deemed an immoral dilution or aberration.
Egalitarians view their all encompassing acceptance of everybody and permissive tolerance towards all as being objective where anything that implies exclusion is deemed immoral.
There is a level of problems for both ideologies going into the future that nobody seems to like talking about which I’ll briefly mention here. For the egalitarians where multiculturalism and multiracialism is paramount to reality preaching diversity is strength we see examples where previous cultural or racial majorities are fast on track becoming minorities on the plateau of extinction level events. If extinction level events transpire where whole entire cultural or racial identities become eradicated egalitarians are going to have a hard time explaining how an ideology of tolerance and diversity lead to it. With their aspirations inevitable cultural, racial, ethnic, and religious conflict is guaranteed where it is puzzling how an ideology that aspires to creating a conflict free environment creates environments rife with it.
For traditionalists the problem with their ideology in a globalist world is that in order to rejuvenate the kind of traditional society they aspire towards whole scale genocide, violence, or ethnic slaughter is needed to enact it as their preferred reality disappears altogether. The last seven to eight decades has been acting vastly against them. Violent forms of enacted segregation would be the only countermeasure.
Feminism and low birth rates in terms of fertility certainly isn’t helping either where unaddressed would make any aspirations on their part virtually impossible. I find it interesting that traditionalists never approach that subject in any grave seriousness concerning dialogue.
As for me I am a neutral observer as a nihilist where I could care less either way.
“In Sweden at first I was appalled by all the rapes of us Swedish women especially as a feminist but later I discovered that these rapes are justified in that it makes up for the white guilt of us Swedes where possibly it might be morally justified on the part of Muslim men. Now I’ve converted to Islam and wear a Hijab everyday. Everyday is a real struggle reconciling my western feminist beliefs with Islam but slowly I am being able to. Down with the sexist white Christian Swedish patriarchy! Allah Akbar!”
The White Lives Matters movement will be listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center when it releases its annual Hate Map in February.
“I can’t speak to how many chapters will be listed, but it’s clear that the leadership of the group, the ends of the group – it’s just a flat-out white supremacist group,” said Heidi Beirich, director of the center’s Intelligence Report, in an interview with Chron.com.
You should go work for the American Tourist Board HaHaHa
It might take a few more generations before things improve… unless some much-needed policy is set in place.
The similarities between national socialism and Marxism needing an external enemy to unite a social movement is uncanny. For national socialists it was Jews and for Marxists it is ‘evil’ white people. In 1930’s Germany it was Jewish privilege that was the scourge of the world and throughout western civilization in the year 2016 it is now presently white [ethnic European] privilege.
In 1930’s Germany it was the onslaught of a super Jewish conspiracy over the world internationally and presently in the year 2016 under Marxist rule it is the plot of ‘evil’ white people conspiring over the world domestically or internationally. History repeats and rhymes.
1930’s Germany
All throughout the western world 2016
It’s racist that there is too many Chinese in China. I demand China take in all the refugees of Syria and Iraq. Fucking racist Chinese and their Chinese ethnocentric privilege.
The ethnocentric racism of the Chinese allows them to still be a majority within their own nation. That is clearly a hate crime and I feel triggered where I need to crawl to the nearest safe space.
The very existence of ethnocentric Chinese is a micro aggression front against the entire planet.
As people noticed earlier in this thread I discussed the origins of multiculturalism being embedded within religious thoughts and ideals. That’s because the entire concept of a one world racial or cultural utopia extends directly from Abrahamic religions. This includes Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
The entire absurdity of racial and cultural one world interconnected utopia (multiculturalism) is a religious motif. Multiculturalism is a direct result of monotheism just as globalism in terms of politics and government is(global government/ political-monism).
Similar groups can co-exist together, but for states to think that more dissimilar groups can is foolish and obviously proving dangerous… what with the latest spate of terror attacks.
When it comes to vastly different religions and beliefs, the state needs to be even more cautious about immigration… when the UK signed up to that last EU regulations reformation a few years back, we also signed our soul away along with our borders and decision-making.
Roll on Article 50 :-"
Oh, I just saw that video after I replied to your last one… I’ve never liked propoganda… no matter who is fuelling it.
Similar groups can co-exist together, but for states to think that more dissimilar groups can is foolish and obviously proving dangerous… what with the latest spate of terror attacks.
When it comes to vastly different religions and beliefs, the state needs to be even more cautious about immigration… when the UK signed up to that last EU regulations reformation a few years back, we also signed our soul away along with our borders and decision-making.
Roll on Article 50 :-"
Different groups of people can coexist on the planet but the need for individual territory and living space will always be present. Competition for such cultural and racial enclaves also. There is however no coexisting when you pick and choose which groups of people can thrive and which ones that cannot. That will lead to disaster and crisis as time moves forward.
I do feel that for western civilization any kind of resurgence or resurrection at this point is too late especially looking at western fertility rates. A race or culture that does not breed and reproduce is effectively a dead one.
Oh, I just saw that video after I replied to your last one… I’ve never liked propoganda… no matter who is fuelling it.
Me too. It should be noted that I consider myself a neutral observer. I am neither for or against multiculturalism just as I am also neither for or against ethnic nationalism also. I am not mentally invested in either existential ideology but I do like discussing the existential crisis of both points. Both subjects taken to the extreme lead to equal catastrophe.