Why NATO? Economically the US and the EU are deadly enemies!

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Moderator: Uccisore

Economically, the US and the EU are deadly enemies. So the NATO must be terminated. Do you agree?

Yes.
6
38%
No.
10
63%
I don't know.
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 16

Re: Why NATO? Economically the US and the EU are deadly enem

Postby Arminius » Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:04 pm

Alf wrote:The more global control, the more "Liberias". :evilfun:

And at last the whole planet Earth will consist of about one million "Liberias"?
Image
User avatar
Arminius
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:51 pm
Location: Saltus Teutoburgiensis

Re: Why NATO? Economically the US and the EU are deadly enem

Postby Alf » Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:33 pm

Arminius wrote:
Alf wrote:The more global control, the more "Liberias". :evilfun:

And at last the whole planet Earth will consist of about one million "Liberias"?

Unless the globalists will be stopped.
User avatar
Alf
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:07 am

Re: Why NATO? Economically the US and the EU are deadly enem

Postby Arminius » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:59 pm

When?
Image
User avatar
Arminius
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:51 pm
Location: Saltus Teutoburgiensis

Re: Why NATO? Economically the US and the EU are deadly enem

Postby Alf » Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:10 am

Arminius wrote:
Alf wrote:
Arminius wrote:And at last the whole planet Earth will consist of about one million "Liberias"?

Unless the globalists will be stopped.

When?

When the average economic status will shrink?
User avatar
Alf
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:07 am

Re: Why NATO? Economically the US and the EU are deadly enem

Postby Arminius » Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:17 am

For comparison:

Arminius wrote:
Alf wrote:
Arminius wrote:One example for those human beings are the killed unborns in the occidental area because they have been being the most humans who have been being completely replaced by machines. If you want to know when, how many, where, under which costs, and why humans are completely replaced by machines you ONLY have to look at the occidental demographic development (especially since the end of the 18th century). The correlation between demography on the one hand and culture (civilisation), economy, intelligence, and - last but not least - technique / technology on the other hand is so obvious that it can not be denied anymore. Look at the data, numbers, and facts of demography and you will find out that the relatively fast decline of the occident is caused by cultural (civilisational) effects which include the economical, scientifical, and - last but not least - technical / technological effects, to which the machines belong.

Table for the machines rates and the fertlity rates since 1770 in the occidental (indusrtial/mecahnical) area: *

Phase / stage| Average machine rate| Average economic status (living standard/wealth/welfare)| Average fertility rate |

1| 1770-1870 |_______ LOW ________|_____________________ LOW ___________________________|_______ HIGH _______|
2| 1870-1970 |______ MIDDLE ______|____________________ MIDDLE __________________________|______ MIDDLE ______|
3| 1970-____ |_______ HIGH _______|_____________________ HIGH ___________________________|_______ LOW ________|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^---------------
* The declared values are average and relative (compared to the average values from 1770 till today) values, so for eaxmple LOW does not mean generally low, but relatively low, and this relative value is also an average value of one phase. And as said: the values refer to the occidental area, its people, its machines (so: immigrants are not included).

Please notice that this values can clearly show that there is a correlation between machines and fertlity. If the machine rate is high, then the fertility rate is low.

In the first phase (stage) and in the first half of the second phase (stage) the machines cause an increasing population, but in the second half of the second phase (stage) and in the third phase (stage) the machines cause a shrinking population. Because of the fact that the "evolution" of machines is going to lead to more phases, new phases (amongst others because of the so called "progress" and the so called "revolutions") one can generally say that machines cause a shrinking population, in other words: machines replace human beings more and more (in an exponential way!).

And when will the third phase end?

One could think: 2070. Right? – What I know for sure in this case is that the third phase will end with the end of the average high economic status.
Image
User avatar
Arminius
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:51 pm
Location: Saltus Teutoburgiensis

Previous

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]