Just a Note.

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Moderator: Uccisore

Just a Note.

Postby PavlovianModel146 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:45 am

Ladies and Gentlemen,

We've recently had a Topic created within Social Sciences advocating pedophilia. That topic has been moved to Quarantine where it will remain unless another Moderator sees fit to move it somewhere else. I will mention that the thread contains items which will henceforth be considered Warnable/Bannable within the Forums of Social Sciences and Current Events.

At the same time, a Philosophy Forum is about open discussion, even including matters that are considered taboo or socially/morally unacceptable.

It is with that in mind that I'm going to lay down some ground rules for discussions of that nature which would generally take place either in Social Sciences or Psychology. I have no control over Psychology, so consider these rules applicable only to Social Sciences unless MagsJ states that she would like to apply them to Psychology.

I will permit threads of this nature to exist within the Social Sciences Forum provided that they adhere to all Board Rules as well as a few additional Rules that I will now detail:

1.) Any such threads will not be designed to advocate the subject matter to any extent greater than discussing the perceived morality/immorality/political positions of such actions.

2.) Any such threads will be text-only, there will be no links and no pictures of any kind whastoever, whether related or unrelated to the subject matter.

3.) Any such threads will not contain sexually explicit or suggestive dialogue with respect to the subject matter.

*Any violations of Rules 1 & 3 will result in an unappealable Warning being issued and subsequent deletion of your post. I will not Edit, I will delete.

** If you violate Rule 2, I will ban you immediately. Do not test me on it.

If you have any questions/comments concerning this thread, please post them directly to this thread, not in Help & Suggestions. For the time being, these rules apply only to my Forums including Social Sciences, Current Events, Creative Writing and Arts, Music & Entertainment.
"Love is the gravity of the Soul" - Abstract -/-/1988 - 3/11/2013 R.I.P

Image
User avatar
PavlovianModel146
Ringing The Bell
 
Posts: 7084
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:56 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Just a Note.

Postby TheJoker » Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:50 am

Okey-dokey then.
I am a humble disciple of chaos. Who wants to join me? A-N-A-R-C-H-Y!

From the Satanic tips of my pen do I write what is on my mind. The internet is my Azazel.

Life is a chess game. Why do I feel like somebody elses pawn?

http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/
User avatar
TheJoker
Antintellectual
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Living homeless on the streets of Seattle, WA

Re: Just a Note.

Postby Stoic Guardian » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 am

Who bumped this?
"Fascism combats, and must combat, without respite or pity, not intelligence, but intellectualism—which is, as I have indicated, a sickness of the intellect" - Giovanni Gentile

”After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”- John F. Kennedy
User avatar
Stoic Guardian
Silvershirt Armchair Legionary
 
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:01 am

Re: Just a Note.

Postby PavlovianModel146 » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:52 am

Nobody, I think it's stickied.
"Love is the gravity of the Soul" - Abstract -/-/1988 - 3/11/2013 R.I.P

Image
User avatar
PavlovianModel146
Ringing The Bell
 
Posts: 7084
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:56 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Just a Note.

Postby The Golden Turd » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:39 am

I never noticed it before. Think a mere ban on deeply illegal pictures are warranted. Your assumptions I understand but are not well thought out, in San Francisco a philosophy professor specializing in sexology studied several pedophile societies that openly practice it, the spartans did as well. I myself am holding a discussion on the Satyricon, and sex with young boys in their mothers household is a theme within the text. It would by your rules be a impossible discussion. I note fellini left it out his remake of the book into film.... I support this wise move..... but the text.... yes, it needs to be open to discussion. Many Muslims see Muhammeds sex with minors not as Harem, as he had gods assurances it was okay. I doubt if the topic came up, they would be willing to debate its morality as its a non issue. But of course, by threat of aunrelenting jihad, no one has ever made pictures of it, so its a non issue. I believe this non picture requirement satisfies ohio pornography with minors present sex offender issue, yes?
Support "The Angels of East Africa" on smile.Amazon.com it is free to do, they donate 0.05% of your purchase cost to them, or give donations directly via:

http://www.machinegunpreacher.org

Image

Recently hidden post:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=192227&p=2649513#p2649513
User avatar
The Golden Turd
Fucking Unflushable
 
Posts: 9450
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:37 am
Location: Apparently Well Up Manical Mongoose's Ass

Re: Just a Note.

Postby PavlovianModel146 » Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:15 pm

It absolutely does.
"Love is the gravity of the Soul" - Abstract -/-/1988 - 3/11/2013 R.I.P

Image
User avatar
PavlovianModel146
Ringing The Bell
 
Posts: 7084
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:56 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Just a Note.

Postby 1mpious » Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:55 am

Rain wrote:I never noticed it before. Think a mere ban on deeply illegal pictures are warranted. Your assumptions I understand but are not well thought out, in San Francisco a philosophy professor specializing in sexology studied several pedophile societies that openly practice it, the spartans did as well. I myself am holding a discussion on the Satyricon, and sex with young boys in their mothers household is a theme within the text. It would by your rules be a impossible discussion. I note fellini left it out his remake of the book into film.... I support this wise move..... but the text.... yes, it needs to be open to discussion. Many Muslims see Muhammeds sex with minors not as Harem, as he had gods assurances it was okay. I doubt if the topic came up, they would be willing to debate its morality as its a non issue. But of course, by threat of aunrelenting jihad, no one has ever made pictures of it, so its a non issue. I believe this non picture requirement satisfies ohio pornography with minors present sex offender issue, yes?

Pedo. Do we really have to talk about daddy poos like they might be ok sometimes?
User avatar
1mpious
decent guy
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:58 am
Location: Sydney


Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users