Rain wrote:I never noticed it before. Think a mere ban on deeply illegal pictures are warranted. Your assumptions I understand but are not well thought out, in San Francisco a philosophy professor specializing in sexology studied several pedophile societies that openly practice it, the spartans did as well. I myself am holding a discussion on the Satyricon, and sex with young boys in their mothers household is a theme within the text. It would by your rules be a impossible discussion. I note fellini left it out his remake of the book into film.... I support this wise move..... but the text.... yes, it needs to be open to discussion. Many Muslims see Muhammeds sex with minors not as Harem, as he had gods assurances it was okay. I doubt if the topic came up, they would be willing to debate its morality as its a non issue. But of course, by threat of aunrelenting jihad, no one has ever made pictures of it, so its a non issue. I believe this non picture requirement satisfies ohio pornography with minors present sex offender issue, yes?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users